Jump to content

MGB: UNT post-spring depth chart, thoughts

Brett Vito

By Brett Vito
in Mean Green Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

4MYMGE
4MYMGE

FYI...Andy Flusche went into the fall practice at 230 lbs. His goal was 255 lbs which is where he was in Spring practice when he was working with the DEs...He was moved to DT during spring ball so no

SilverEagle
SilverEagle

Except that Means is better. My "end of spring" depth chart at QB would have been McNulty, Means, and then Greer. If they had given Cousins more reps I might have put him somewhere even with Greer

greenit
greenit

I have had just about enough of your fact based opinions with supporting documentation. Do you know where you are?

UNT90 Newbie

UNT90

Posted
Posted

So is Blake Bean eligible this year.

Why is Sir Calvin not even listed? Anthony Wallace?

Why would they not list James Jones as a starter at corner?

Who is Sheldon Wade?

Yes, I forgot about Sir Calvin. Seems like he is nearing the point of the whole college football world forgetting about him. Better step it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SilverEagle Mentor

SilverEagle

Posted
Posted

It will be Greer and there's nothing wrong with that.

Except that Means is better.

My "end of spring" depth chart at QB would have been McNulty, Means, and then Greer. If they had given Cousins more reps I might have put him somewhere even with Greer. I already thought, from watching him in early spring drills, that he had a better release/thowing motion. In the spring game he ran with it once and looked pretty mobile. But one play is not enough to fully assess. Shanbour has the best release/throwing motion of all of them.

Additionally, I would have put Jarrod Lynn (#98) somewhere in the three deep at the TE position. As I've said before he looks like a Miller/Prior type TE.

  • Downvote 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
DT 90 Newbie

DT 90

Posted
Posted (edited)

Spring 2-Deep doesn't mean anything? :

2013

There was exactly 1 position in which the Week 1 Starter was different from the Spring 2 Deep Starter (DE- Chad Polk was Spring and Daryl Mason was actual starter)

Three positions on offense had different No.2s (2 WRs and RT)

Beside the starting DE - three defensive positions had different No. 2s. ( DE ,MLB and FS)

Edited by DT 90
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
greenit Newbie

greenit

Posted
Posted

Spring 2-Deep doesn't mean anything? :

2013

There was exactly 1 position in which the Week 1 Starter was different from the Spring 2 Deep Starter (DE- Chad Polk was Spring and Daryl Mason was actual starter)

Three positions on offense had different No.2s (2 WRs and RT)

Beside the starting DE - three defensive positions had different No. 2s. ( DE ,MLB and FS)

I have had just about enough of your fact based opinions with supporting documentation.

Do you know where you are?

  • Upvote 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
DT 90 Newbie

DT 90

Posted
Posted

I have had just about enough of your fact based opinions with supporting documentation.

Do you know where you are?

Man, I am so totally sorry about that. I do sometimes forget myself. I will work harder on not being that way.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Censored by Laurie Veteran

Censored by Laurie

Posted
Posted

Spring 2-Deep doesn't mean anything? :

2013

There was exactly 1 position in which the Week 1 Starter was different from the Spring 2 Deep Starter (DE- Chad Polk was Spring and Daryl Mason was actual starter)

Three positions on offense had different No.2s (2 WRs and RT)

Beside the starting DE - three defensive positions had different No. 2s. ( DE ,MLB and FS)

For the sake of playing devil's advocate...and hoping the Wallaces and a few others find their way into the 2-deep...last year's team was far more senior-laden, especially on defense. I'd say after Spring ball, pretty much everyone knew who at least 9 or 10 starters would be without needing a released 2-deep...and the only real surprises came with the emergence of Buyers and Jones into the season.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
greenit Newbie

greenit

Posted
Posted

Where are the most likely changes to occur? And I am really talking about somebody coming from off the page to challenge for a starting position, but even a flip flop of 1vs 2.

QB? Probably going to be one of the 2 listed.

OL? Not likely unless an injury occurs.

TE? Smith seems like the top guy.

WR? Possible, but whose spot?

P/K? Nah.

DL? Maybe a late qualifier?

LB? Maybe. Some talent did not make the page

CB? Don't see it

S? Doubtful

I would expect some incoming WRs to get some PT but could see a lot of others redshirting.

Looking forward to the fall. Want to see/hear good thing about front 7.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DT 90 Newbie

DT 90

Posted
Posted

As stated above, I think Mac uses his after spring depth charts for more motivation purposes than a real evaluation. As I remember, the one released in 2013 had little resemblance other than the obvious starters to reality.

I am sorry but I am not supposed to post fact based opinions supported by documentation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
NorthTexan95 Experienced

NorthTexan95

Posted
Posted

I am sorry but I am not supposed to post fact based opinions supported by documentation.

I am sorry but using 2013 is an extremely small sample size. It could have just worked out that the post spring roster was very, very close to the starting lineups for the first game. How did that work in 2012 or 2011? This would give us more information.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DT 90 Newbie

DT 90

Posted
Posted

I am sorry but using 2013 is an extremely small sample size. It could have just worked out that the post spring roster was very, very close to the starting lineups for the first game. How did that work in 2012 or 2011? This would give us more information.

This will require fact based opinion backed up by documentation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


WE BELIEVE IN THE MEAN GREEN!

News

Recruiting

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.