Sadly, This Guy Was Going To Fund Our Stadium
-
Who's Online 8 Members, 1 Anonymous, 293 Guests (See full list)
-
Images
-
Tell a friend
-
What's going on Mean Green?
-
33
Fauci Under Fire
Some folks obviously see things quite differently. https://www.sfgate.com/tech/article/trump-conviction-musk-sacks-maguire-19488628.php Minutes after the news broke, Sequoia Capital investor Shaun Maguire posted a 3,500-word treatise to X, explaining why he’d just donated $300,000 to the former president. Maguire, whose Menlo Park-based investment firm has money in OpenAI, Stripe and other top startups, wrote that he’d donated to Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign and voted for her. But now he’s changed his mind: “I believe this is one of the most important elections of my lifetime, and I’m supporting Trump.” -
33
Fauci Under Fire
This was called "a nazi tweet" by members of the mainstream media. The characterization is absurd. -
12
John Buggs IIII Lands At............................
Was he run out of town? I mean it is pretty curious that he’s gone to a new school every year. Maybe no one can stand him for long? He was a pretty useable piece for us who was put in a position to do the things he does well. I enjoyed rooting for him. I don’t like it, but I get it if he gets a $$$ P4 offer and takes it. But why would a player like that go from North Texas to East Tennessee (really?) unless he was forced out? -
33
Fauci Under Fire
I mean, sure. At bare minimum, this seems to read as actual personal convictions as opposed to a contrive political platform. -
0
Looking to discuss, or debate: the future of CFB.
It isn't unusual for the doomsayers to dominate a discussion. Kind of like some are more likely to complain out loud about bad food or service than reflecting it in a tip. That said, the general trend is that CFB is changing, and not for the better. Especially for fans of less esteemed (rich) teams. If it is inevitable that the smaller schools will have to find a way to stay/become relevant, consider this (and by the way, I subscribe to the "there are no original thoughts remaining" so this isn't likely the first time you have seen this): Adapt a major league baseball, farm system model. The 50 or so elites can contract with 3 lessers to be their farm teams. Lessers might be considered A, AA, AAA. The current G5s, perhaps not all, could negotiate with the 50 to be their AAA team, hopefully with a regional bias. Current FCS teams might be AA, and whoever is left can negotiate their way into the A spots. Championships could be played at each level. Each "farm" team would run their programs independent of their Major League team. Clearly the Major would want some influence but their would also be organic back and forth discussions about recruits, and it might even be part of the Major's recruiting strategy. "We really like you but we are stocked at RB and we would like to get you on the field in the Minors for a year, then bring you up. Here is an extra $150k to supplement what the Minor program will offer while you are there." But the Major would be given, for the contracted price, the right to "call up" any player on the farm teams. Players could go up and down in the system. Some Major signees may be sent down if they don't perform to the value of their NIL, some Minor players would move up. The Major could elect to continue to pay the Major NIL price that those sent down signed up for, to keep them in the system or not. Each minor level could offer its own NIL, and some of that funding could come from the revenue generated by its relationship with the Major. To make it a bit more challenging, the minors could agree to run the same offense and defense as the major. It may be part of the negotiation amongst G5s as to who they may line up with. Even in-season call ups would be more natural if the player is in the same system as the Major team calling him up. Players might get called up for the bowl game when a Major player opts out of its bowl game. UTSA would likely line up with UT, as an example, and adopt similar playing styles. Free agency would be restricted to certain times, just like the transfer portal is now. And money is going to play a big part in that. But maybe teams might offer more money for a longer commitment to stay, that either player or team could get out of for a price (say part of the NIL payment is escrowed for a period of time to be clawed back if the player opts to leave, or a separation payment is paid by the team to get rid of a kid it no longer wants). To me, the upside for the minors is their place in the sport has more relevance, and likely more revenue (the two are related) through their relationship to the Major. There are likely many issues to make this impossible. I'd like to hear them, and there is likely more to add on the positive side. Flame away, friends. GMG- 1
-
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
Member Statistics
-
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.