Jump to content

Can USF afford the Bulls’ $340 million on-campus football stadium?


Recommended Posts

When University of South Florida officials presented an initial budget for a $340 million on-campus football stadium last month, chief financial officer Richard J. Sobieray stood behind the figures being used to justify one of the biggest decisions in school history.

“I’m a conservative CFO in nature,” Sobieray said then at the board of trustees’ finance committee meeting, “and I think if I had issues with this I would definitely express them.”

Not everyone shares Sobieray’s confidence.

As the full board prepares for Tuesday’s vote on whether to authorize $200 million in debt for the Bulls’ proposed 35,000-seat facility, the Tampa Bay Times shared the financial projections with three academics who study stadium economics. Their reactions ranged from cautious optimism to downright disbelief.

“I don’t know if I’d call it economic malpractice,” said College of the Holy Cross economics professor Victor Matheson, who literally co-wrote the book on sports economics, “but it’s pretty close to it.”

read more:  https://www.tampabay.com/sports/bulls/2023/06/09/usf-football-on-campus-stadium-ocs-bulls-conference-realignment/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

UNT was so fortunate to have the land available and be able to build Apogee Stadium with 31,000 seats plus suites and club space for only $78 million.   It changed our whole athletic conference future up to this point in joining the AAC.  However, scheduling issues are on the horizon with dark clouds...

Scheduling trends could make those types of opponents less likely to visit by the time a stadium opens. The Atlantic Coast Conference is discouraging its teams from playing road games against schools in midmajor conferences, like USF’s league, the American Athletic Conference. That decreases the odds that big local draws like Florida State University and the University of Miami will play at USF in the future.

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, NT80 said:

UNT was so fortunate to have the land available and be able to build Apogee Stadium with 31,000 seats plus suites and club space for only $78 million. 

That was one of the best financial deals in the history of the University to my knowledge.  We literally stole that stadium at that price.  SMUt spent double that for a lessor stadium in my opinion.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NT80 said:

UNT was so fortunate to have the land available and be able to build Apogee Stadium with 31,000 seats plus suites and club space for only $78 million.   It changed our whole athletic conference future up to this point in joining the AAC.  However, scheduling issues are on the horizon with dark clouds...

Scheduling trends could make those types of opponents less likely to visit by the time a stadium opens. The Atlantic Coast Conference is discouraging its teams from playing road games against schools in midmajor conferences, like USF’s league, the American Athletic Conference. That decreases the odds that big local draws like Florida State University and the University of Miami will play at USF in the future.

If the Presidents and the ADs of the so-called "midmajors" would work together and say, that's OK, but if the ACC wants one of our schools to play there, then it should be a set minimum (say $3 million).*** While they will discourage this, I am sure they will not discourage them from scheduling lower-tier FCS teams. At the end of the day, the P5s want to find a mix that ensures as many teams as possible hit the 6-win level since the Bowls would rather see a P5 that went 2-6 in conference rather than a G5.
 

*** I say this tongue in cheek as the presidents and athletic directors of G5 schools have shown throughout the years they are about as clueless and idiotic as can be when it comes to working together to reduce cost and provide regional competition that could increase attendance and support.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Jonnyeagle said:

On a positive note, I think once this stadium is finished it will be hands down the nicest most impressive stadium in the AAC.  Perhaps tops in the country!  The facilities in the AAC are truly top notch with the exception of UTSA.

image.png.8c6b37b94cb0e4960bfe3a0a32b976c9.png

And yet UTSA had the best team in CUSA and will be one of  the favorites to win the AAC this year. Perhaps recruiting and coaching trump facilities . Unless USF sees this stadium as a pathway to joining UCF in the BIG 12 it appears to be a waste of money.

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, wardly said:

And yet UTSA had the best team in CUSA and will be one of  the favorites to win the AAC this year. Perhaps recruiting and coaching trump facilities . Unless USF sees this stadium as a pathway to joining UCF in the BIG 12 it appears to be a waste of money.

Well UTSA did have a big win landing Frank Harris who seems to have been playing there for a decade.  Seth did not care about recruiting, felt he and his staff could "coach them up".  Thankfully that seems to have changed.

  • Upvote 1
  • Eye Roll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.