Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The most self righteous men I know seem to be the ones who are getting handy's at the strip club... Who cares what people do? Just support Mean Green Football. If you don't do that than you sir lack moral fiber!

You know lots of self-righteous men frequenting strip clubs?  You just may need to find a new set of friends.    

You are correct about those last two sentences..

  • Downvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep...I would Alonzo.  Why?  Because I would know some jerk did it and not me.  And, so would anyone who knows me.  It would take a real jerk to do something like that and a very small person...not some "prankster".  As you know...it would be pretty easy to figure out the computer from which the registration was made.  Most jerks who would do such a thing would not be bright enough to "borrow" a computer...and might even have done it from their office..say at UNT.  Yes, Sir, I'd still be laughing my rear end off at these scumbags. Don't need to double check...don't care.  But, pray tell, why would someone do that a year ago since no breech was even anticipated at that time.  A tad too late now to be very effective with that sort of childish low life action.

You do, however, seem to know a lot about that site.

UKqSh9f.gif

You seem to have misread what I posted as a threat.  Like Emerson said, people do not seem to realize their opinion of the world is also a confession of their character.

I was simply trying to get you to not rush to judgement about people who may appear in that data dump.    Instead you quickly also rushed to judgement on my intentions. 

Yes I do know a lot about the AM data breach because it is a data breach, and that happens to be one of my fields of interest in IT.  I also know a ton about the stuxnet virus attack on the Iranian reactors, but I didn't write any Siemens PLC code.

 

PS: A little overly defensive, que no?

PPS: I don't even know anyone named Alonzo.    

PPPS: Sorry for ruining your schadenfreude, the most righteous of all feelings.

Edited by Cerebus
  • Upvote 4
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As someone who also works in IT, I am interested in all data breaches, how they occurred, and try to learn about better security in an effort to help me and my company defend against such attacks going forward.

All data has some value to everyone (the company who collects it and its original owner -- you!); all data can be damaging if taken from both the company and the individual(s) the data is about.  By the way, data doesn't have to be digital!

Target is still paying through the nose for its data breach more than a year and a half ago.  They just settled with one of the credit card companies to cover much of the costs involved in reissuing new cards for the ones that were involved in the breach.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

UKqSh9f.gif

You seem to have misread what I posted as a threat.  Like Emerson said, people do not seem to realize their opinion of the world is also a confession of their character.

I was simply trying to get you to not rush to judgement about people who may appear in that data dump.    Instead you quickly also rushed to judgement on my intentions. 

Yes I do know a lot about the AM data breach because it is a data breach, and that happens to be one of my fields of interest in IT.  I also know a ton about the stuxnet virus attack on the Iranian reactors, but I didn't write any Siemens PLC code.

 

PS: A little overly defensive, que no?

PPS: I don't even know anyone named Alonzo.    

PPPS: Sorry for ruining your schadenfreude, the most righteous of all feelings.

nope.  did not misread a thing...not even your reply here.  

PS:  you would have to get up a lot earlier to spoil anything for me.  You aren't important enough for me to care what you think.  

PSS: if you don't like my replies...don't direct your pompous posts directly to me.  Easy, huh?

PSS:  these folks on Ashley Madison are scumbags ... you are free to defend them if you wish.  Or, to make up inane possibilities how some fool could have been vindictive enough to "join" in someone else's name.

i think it may be time to cut this thread off...at least for me.  

  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

now we have a real debate. 

when following a post-script, or "PS" with a subsequent thought...is it a post-post-script, or "PPS" or a post-script-script, a "PSS"?

on the surface, "PPS" seems the most logical...however it could also be interpreted as very open-ended...a post-post-script what? could be a funny gif, emoji or picture of danny meager with a football glued to his head just as easily as it could be an articulated thought through words...whereas there seems to be little to no ambiguity with a "PSS", though perhaps I would argue that one's "PSS" should not only be longer than their "PS", but it's length should rival that of the original script, or "S", as it is implying it to be another separate script following the post-script. 

from a truly pragmatic standpoint, I suppose "PSPS" actually makes the most sense. but that just looks effing stupid. 

  • Upvote 4
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

now we have a real debate. 

when following a post-script, or "PS" with a subsequent thought...is it a post-post-script, or "PPS" or a post-script-script, a "PSS"?

on the surface, "PPS" seems the most logical...however it could also be interpreted as very open-ended...a post-post-script what? could be a funny gif, emoji or picture of danny meager with a football glued to his head just as easily as it could be an articulated thought through words...whereas there seems to be little to no ambiguity with a "PSS", though perhaps I would argue that one's "PSS" should not only be longer than their "PS", but it's length should rival that of the original script, or "S", as it is implying it to be another separate script following the post-script. 

from a truly pragmatic standpoint, I suppose "PSPS" actually makes the most sense. but that just looks effing stupid. 

tumblr_lifahf7O8A1qbx1d3.gif

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 kids and counting ... Fine moral people (sarcasm) ....... besides if all of us had that many kids ... the world  would be an impossible place to live in a couple of generations.... [ no food, no  open land etc.. I have always found them disgusting.... way before this happened. These is a limit to how many people this planet can support .... and those poor starving kids you usually see on those commercials usually come from places that are way over populated and have few recourses.  

I am Christian but how many of the TV preachers and supposedly TV super-Christians have been involving in this sort of thing.....lots... includes Jim Baker, Jimmy Swaggert and many, many more.  They are more about money than Christianity or morality... .

 

Math :   19 x19  = 361...  so every two of us becomes 361 people in two generations.... STUPID..

.

Edited by SCREAMING EAGLE-66
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

now we have a real debate. 

when following a post-script, or "PS" with a subsequent thought...is it a post-post-script, or "PPS" or a post-script-script, a "PSS"?

on the surface, "PPS" seems the most logical...however it could also be interpreted as very open-ended...a post-post-script what? could be a funny gif, emoji or picture of danny meager with a football glued to his head just as easily as it could be an articulated thought through words...whereas there seems to be little to no ambiguity with a "PSS", though perhaps I would argue that one's "PSS" should not only be longer than their "PS", but it's length should rival that of the original script, or "S", as it is implying it to be another separate script following the post-script. 

from a truly pragmatic standpoint, I suppose "PSPS" actually makes the most sense. but that just looks effing stupid. 

PPS too exclusionary to S's!?

Typical liberal logic.

/sarcasm

 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2015/08/28/ashley_madison_hacked_email_list_why_do_we_want_men_punished_when_most_of.html

 

 

I'm sorry, I think most people who signed up were nothing more than voyeurs.  Obviously that is the case with all of 1300 real women signed up, but I bet even most of the guys who got an account were not actually looking to cheat on their wives (and I bet some single guys were on there hoping to find some frustrated wife out there to hook up with), it was more the idea.  Kind of like all the happily, married people that look at porn.  No matter how happy someone is in a relationship, sometimes you just fantasize about other people, even if you would never ever cheat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.