Jump to content

Has our secondary been tested yet... Really?


Stan R

Recommended Posts

You've got to admit, Calvin Klein was off against us. If he hits just a couple more of those WIDE open receivers, no one would talking about how close we played K-State.

And if the facemask is called and the TD pass isn't overturned...

Ain't no if or buts in football. It is what it is.

We CANNOT allow Robinson to stand in the pocket like we did Klien. We have to get pressure from the 4 down linemen. I think we will. I think we have at least 2 picks.

BUT. No, we don't really know what we have as a team yet, other than we can damn sure run the football.

Saturday will be very telling.

Edited by UNT90
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Klein's second in line (possibly 1st now) as far as Heisman QB candidates are concerned, so I don't guess he can be too bad with his arm. As far as our secondary is concerned, I think our safeties are coming along well despite a few mistakes, but I feel like the jury is still out on our corners. They have done well in the turnover department.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And if the facemask is called and the TD pass isn't overturned...

Ain't no if or buts in football. It is what it is.

I think you missed my point.

My point was, we were allowing WRs to run wild in our defensive backfield way too often. Further, my point was that we don't want to get too sure of ourselves because we kept it close with K-State. And further, my point was that if we allow WRs to run wild in our defensive backfield again, it's not too likely to work out in our favor again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you missed my point.

My point was, we were allowing WRs to run wild in our defensive backfield way too often. Further, my point was that we don't want to get too sure of ourselves because we kept it close with K-State. And further, my point was that if we allow WRs to run wild in our defensive backfield again, it's not too likely to work out in our favor again.

No, I got it. I just don't think QBs missing receivers happens in a vaccum. Maybe the receiver was open because he cut the route short because of the secondary alignment and the QB didn't make the same adjustment as the receivers.

Maybe (admittedly not so much against K St.) the ball wasn't there because of pressure. I think pressure WILL be a bigger factor on Saturday.

Their are a lot more variables than just isolated secondary play. Saturday will tell us much.

Edited by UNT90
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.