Jump to content

CFB Playoff


NT93

Recommended Posts

Obviously not Mean Green related, but a good discussion nonetheless.

No telling what "The Committee" will do this week, but I have a feeling two, maybe three teams are going to get in the playoffs that probably couldn't finish in the top 4 in the SEC, Big 12, or maybe even Pac 12.  The Big 12 has four solid teams, none of which are going to get in.  I don't think Clemson, Notre Dame, or Iowa could go through the Big 12 with less than 2 losses and they'd likely have 3 or 4.  Same if they were in the SEC West.  Playoff needs to have 6 teams with the conference champions, plus 1...preferably the top G5 school (which will never happen).

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

...is a bunch of bs. 

A talking head (can't remember who) was on local espn radio 103.3 a few days ago. He put it best. "It's like they're shooting arrows into a tree and drawing a target around it." He said not to pay attention much to the top 4 when breaking it down, but look at who they try to break into the top 25 of their poll and who they try to keep teams at serve after a loss. He said that it runs eerily similar to opponents played of who they have in their top 4. He called it a loaded and a "good ol boy" system. He was even bringing up statistical variance into it and how the numbers, RPI, SOS, etc. all points to a rigged system. I wish I could've caught his name. He was spot on. 

In other words, It's horribly flawed. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

...is a bunch of bs. 

A talking head (can't remember who) was on local espn radio 103.3 a few days ago. He put it best. "It's like they're shooting arrows into a tree and drawing a target around it." He said not to pay attention much to the top 4 when breaking it down, but look at who they try to break into the top 25 of their poll and who they try to keep teams at serve after a loss. He said that it runs eerily similar to opponents played of who they have in their top 4. He called it a loaded and a "good ol boy" system. He was even bringing up statistical variance into it and how the numbers, RPI, SOS, etc. all points to a rigged system. I wish I could've caught his name. He was spot on. 

In other words, It's horribly flawed. 

Joel Klatt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.