Jump to content

Round 2 of Facilities Improvement Started


BTG_Fan1

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Wag Tag said:

Build a IPF!!! Then a 7500 BB like SMU.. their 5,000 season tickets have been sold out!

Weren't they already supposed to release information about the IPF already(?) I thought they had wanted to start it early this year with it done in the summer/fall?? I know it had been brought up(or discussed) for a Vote back in Sept/ Oct or atleast was nearing the point for the school to vote on it, but nothing since but I may have missed it

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BTG_Fan1 said:

Weren't they already supposed to release information about the IPF already(?) I thought they had wanted to start it early this year with it done in the summer/fall?? I know it had been brought up(or discussed) for a Vote back in Sept/ Oct or atleast was nearing the point for the school to vote on it, but nothing since but I may have missed it

An IPF is being worked on. They (Wren and ???) have been researching what other schools have and putting together what NT wants and needs in a facility. I never heard a timeline from him but it sounded like they had an architect (firm?) penciling some initial sketches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, UNTFan23 said:

An IPF is being worked on. They (Wren and ???) have been researching what other schools have and putting together what NT wants and needs in a facility. I never heard a timeline from him but it sounded like they had an architect (firm?) penciling some initial sketches.

Did we ever find out where they plan on building the IPF?   Are they going to put it where the current DD Practice Fields are?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MeanGreenTexan said:

Did we ever find out where they plan on building the IPF?   Are they going to put it where the current DD Practice Fields are?

I don't know if a precise location was mentioned when I talked with him at the signing day event but it'll be somewhere in the Mean Green village. Maybe next to the Tennis complex? I think they wanted to keep the outdoor fields intact so they have a grass surface to practice on.

I think it was said football offices would be a part of the IPF. They were trying to determine how tall the building might be in order to possible allowing some kicking drills. It wasn't determined whether it be a full 100-yd field or not.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, UNTFan23 said:

I don't know if a precise location was mentioned when I talked with him at the signing day event but it'll be somewhere in the Mean Green village. Maybe next to the Tennis complex? I think they wanted to keep the outdoor fields intact so they have a grass surface to practice on.

I think it was said football offices would be a part of the IPF. They were trying to determine how tall the building might be in order to possible allowing some kicking drills. It wasn't determined whether it be a full 100-yd field or not.

Aren't the current football offices right next/over looking Apogee?

I'd like to see them add/ include a gym to the IDF that is state of the art! or do this next to apogee

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WB has mentioned via Twitter that he hopes to have some designs available by the Spring.  Based on his response, it does not sound like they have the requirements completely nailed down and they are still spitballing ideas.  The thing he mentioned was that the scope had grown from the original idea, whatever that means.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TreeFiddy said:

WB has mentioned via Twitter that he hopes to have some designs available by the Spring.  Based on his response, it does not sound like they have the requirements completely nailed down and they are still spitballing ideas.  The thing he mentioned was that the scope had grown from the original idea, whatever that means.

I think they want to go multi-sport rather than this be just for football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Ryan Munthe said:

UNT has never made the second round of the tournament. UNT's first invite was 86. It wasn't my era. Statistically, the mid-2000s was our most successful era. Yes, we were ranked under Blakely, but the reality is we had sustained success under Johnny unlike any other.

Sorry, wrong.  Blakeley's teams were our most successful and he filled the SP.  I was there for both eras.

 

Edited by UNTLifer
  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We need to stop talking about 20-30 years ago when the SP was being filled... The team has not been anything great, outside of a few seasons Both the SP and the team on the court needs to be upgraded.

As of now, they are developing an idea for the new SP with is ideally sitting 4-5k with it most likely able to expand as well. Along with the AD most likely already looking for a new coach.

  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BTG_Fan1 said:

We need to stop talking about 20-30 years ago when the SP was being filled... The team has not been anything great, outside of a few seasons Both the SP and the team on the court needs to be upgraded.

As of now, they are developing an idea for the new SP with is ideally sitting 4-5k with it most likely able to expand as well. Along with the AD most likely already looking for a new coach.

Exactly!!

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, BTG_Fan1 said:

We need to stop talking about 20-30 years ago when the SP was being filled... The team has not been anything great, outside of a few seasons Both the SP and the team on the court needs to be upgraded.

As of now, they are developing an idea for the new SP with is ideally sitting 4-5k with it most likely able to expand as well. Along with the AD most likely already looking for a new coach.

The SP has only been filled once for NT basketball, so there has never been an era where getting seats was a problem.   

As far as not talking about teams older than most of the posters.  Why should we limit any discussion?  The reference was made back to the mid-sixties into seventies to educate those that think Coach Jones success has never been matched by any NT teams.  

On 2/17/2017 at 9:54 PM, Ryan Munthe said:

Statistically, they weren't, and we have no way to prove attendance. The few things I can find says he didn't, but okay.

Well quite a few of us were there in both eras, something obviously something you can't said.   Blakeley had a slightly higher winning percentage than Jones, against much better competition, so I don't see how you can really argue that point.   As for as attendance, even in the best days, the average in the SP was about half full.  But frankly that was a lot more than Jones ever averaged because the counts were much more accurate than they were in the Jones days.  

Spika's overall winning average was probably about .500, but there was so much difference in the MVC and the Sun Belt that those records are not comparable.  The best conference in the land to the twenty-something.

Edited by GrandGreen
  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rk Coach From To Yrs G W L W-L% CREG CTRN NCAA FF NC
1 Johnny Jones 2002 2012 11 336 190 146 .565 1 2 2 0 0
2 Bill Blakeley 1976 1983 8 219 134 85 .612 0 0 0 0 0
3 Jimmy Gales 1987 1993 7 202 84 118 .416 2 1 1 0 0
4 Tony Benford 2013 2017 5 152 61 91 .401 0 0 0 0 0
5 Dan Spika 1966 1970 5 127 58 69 .457 0 0 0 0 0
6 Tim Jankovich 1994 1997 4 110 53 57 .482 0 0 0 0 0
7 Gene Robbins 1972 1975 4 103 36 67 .350 0 0 0 0 0
8 Charles Johnson 1960 1965 6 150 36 114 .240 0 0 0 0 0
9 James St. Clair 1922 1923 2 26 24 2 .923 0 0      
10 Tommy Newman 1984 1986 3 84 24 60 .286 0 0 0 0 0
11 Vic Trilli 1998 2001 4 107 20 87 .187 0 0 0 0 0
12 Harry Miller 1971 1971 1 25 10 15 .400 0 0 0 0 0
13 Pete Shands 1958 1959 2 45 9 36 .200 0 0 0 0 0

Johnny Jones has more wins but Blakely has a better win percent. Tough to say who is/was a better coach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, UNTFan23 said:
Rk Coach From To Yrs G W L W-L% CREG CTRN NCAA FF NC
1 Johnny Jones 2002 2012 11 336 190 146 .565 1 2 2 0 0
2 Bill Blakeley 1976 1983 8 219 134 85 .612 0 0 0 0 0
3 Jimmy Gales 1987 1993 7 202 84 118 .416 2 1 1 0 0
4 Tony Benford 2013 2017 5 152 61 91 .401 0 0 0 0 0
5 Dan Spika 1966 1970 5 127 58 69 .457 0 0 0 0 0
6 Tim Jankovich 1994 1997 4 110 53 57 .482 0 0 0 0 0
7 Gene Robbins 1972 1975 4 103 36 67 .350 0 0 0 0 0
8 Charles Johnson 1960 1965 6 150 36 114 .240 0 0 0 0 0
9 James St. Clair 1922 1923 2 26 24 2 .923 0 0      
10 Tommy Newman 1984 1986 3 84 24 60 .286 0 0 0 0 0
11 Vic Trilli 1998 2001 4 107 20 87 .187 0 0 0 0 0
12 Harry Miller 1971 1971 1 25 10 15 .400 0 0 0 0 0
13 Pete Shands 1958 1959 2 45 9 36 .200 0 0 0 0 0

Johnny Jones has more wins but Blakely has a better win percent. Tough to say who is/was a better coach.

.401 winning percentage, by god. Most of those are probably D2 wins too. *vomit*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ryan Munthe said:

.401 winning percentage, by god. Most of those are probably D2 wins too. *vomit*

NAIA is more likely, which is not the same as D2. It's a little between the two divisions, D1 and D2, but not much better than D2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/17/2017 at 9:54 PM, Ryan Munthe said:

Statistically, they weren't, and we have no way to prove attendance. The few things I can find says he didn't, but okay.

Blakeley's winning percentage = .612

Jones' winning percentage = .569

Blakeley also dropped all non-Div 1 teams for the 76-77 season after not getting an invite to the NCAA tourney.  Went 21-6 with that schedule.  There isn't really a way to determine who was best objectively, but I watched both teams and would give the nod to Blakeley.  I would also be comfortable in stating that attendance was better back then.  We had our only sellout during that period and also hosted #1 Depaul to a very near capacity.  JJ never got close to filling it up.  You favorite memories are of JJ and mine of BB.  The only true lesson to come from this is that we need a coach with the same initials.

Edited by UNTLifer
  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You'd better go back and check your figures on Pete Shands.  He coached here what seems like forever.  I believe that he was at North Texas part of the 30s. all of the 40s and part of the 50s.  If I remember correctly (doubtful anymore) he won more than 400 games but he also lost around 600.

The only Super Pit sellout that I remember was SMU but there were a number of near sellouts, especially in Bill Blakeley's first three years.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, GrayEagle said:

You'd better go back and check your figures on Pete Shands.  He coached here what seems like forever.  I believe that he was at North Texas part of the 30s. all of the 40s and part of the 50s.  If I remember correctly (doubtful anymore) he won more than 400 games but he also lost around 600.

Found a tid bit on him via Wiki's article on Blakeley:
 

Quote

[Shands] coached North Texas Men's Basketball from 1935 to 1959, has the most wins with 217 over 22 seasons.

The truth is even if you coached 30 games/season - which didn't happen in that era - it would take 34 years to play 1000 games.

 

Edited by greenminer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.