Jump to content

Just rewatched the first SMU game


Recommended Posts

This team was at 100% health and ended that game 12-6 (5-1 in conference).   I just can’t help but think this team, if Rubin and CJ never go down and we stay in our normal game to game rhythm, is sitting at maybe 3-4 conference losses right now.  

  • Upvote 7
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, emmitt01 said:

This team was at 100% health and ended that game 12-6 (5-1 in conference).   I just can’t help but think this team, if Rubin and CJ never go down and we stay in our normal game to game rhythm, is sitting at maybe 3-4 conference losses right now.  

100%

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, emmitt01 said:

This team was at 100% health and ended that game 12-6 (5-1 in conference).   I just can’t help but think this team, if Rubin and CJ never go down and we stay in our normal game to game rhythm, is sitting at maybe 3-4 conference losses right now.  

And if Walker started the season we pick up another 3-4 out of conference wins. Maybe top 25 team. 

  • Upvote 3
  • Eye Roll 2
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate to play the woulda, coulda, shoulda game, but without injuries and if we could finish the last 5 minutes of games out - there was only three games we never played good enough to win (Mississippi State, Charlotte, @ UAB), and I know we had a 10-point lead early in Tupelo.

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BigWillie said:

All of that just makes me more excited about this tournament and even next year. Imagine if we can hold onto JE and add another similar to him. This team could see a ranking I think.

I'd like to hear others' thoughts on this, but instead of targeting a bunch of P5 role players/non-scorers in the portal (Allen, though I've loved his play, Walker, Noland, etc.) why don't we look for a couple more of the kids who are used to scoring 15-20ppg at the lower DII, DIII, NJCAA, NAIA levels, like TP and Edwards?

Don't get me wrong, I love the guys we brought in, but besides Edwards, none of them were the go-to guys for their previous teams, and too often this year Jason had been virtually all of our offense.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Matt from A700 said:

I'd like to hear others' thoughts on this, but instead of targeting a bunch of P5 role players/non-scorers in the portal (Allen, though I've loved his play, Walker, Noland, etc.) why don't we look for a couple more of the kids who are used to scoring 15-20ppg at the lower DII, DIII, NJCAA, NAIA levels, like TP and Edwards?

Don't get me wrong, I love the guys we brought in, but besides Edwards, none of them were the go-to guys for their previous teams, and too often this year Jason had been virtually all of our offense.

I would bring in ONE of the type of player you  describe.  Noland, Walker, and Allen do all of the things that are forgotten while guys like Edwards are scoring…the hard nosed defense and energy in the paint (Allen), the big body post up game from the guard position and ability to bring the ball up court (Noland) and the perimeter defense and rebounding (Walker).    And Noland averages almost 10 (9.9) a game.  
 

Without those high level role players, you have to hope to outscore people.  

  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, emmitt01 said:

Without those high level role players, you have to hope to outscore people.  

With those high level role players, you have to hope to outscore people. In every loss you are outscored. In every win you outscore your opponent. 

  • Upvote 1
  • Oh Boy! 1
  • Eye Roll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BleedingGreen said:

I think we are the team that can sneak up on anyone.  I prefer the 6 seed to play a team who already played but a 7 seed gets Charlotte with a. W. 

Right now the 7 seed gets FAU.  I'd rather play Charlotte than the Owls.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, emmitt01 said:

pulp fiction check out the big brain on brett GIF

The movie line was “Check out the big brain on Brad”. Brett was his actual name in the movie, but Jules referred to him as Brad in that line (disrespectfully as his name was Brett).A glowing example, not that it was required, of you repeating inaccurate information simply because it “sounded good”.  🐑 Wrong twice in the same thread 🤣🤣

762CDC63-3661-4763-890C-EB82185AD782.gif

Edited by HoosMeanGreen
  • Eye Roll 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.