Jump to content

ULM Takes Down P5 Wake Forest


DeepGreen

Recommended Posts

Smart scheduling, and the game was in Monroe. Amazing, isn't it? You can bring in "low hanging" P5 teams for winnable, home games.

UNT did that in 2012 with Indiana....how did that end again?

Now we only have to make sure we also bet them at their place

Edited by outoftown
Link to comment
Share on other sites

UNT did that in 2012 with Indiana....how did that end again?

Now we only have to make sure we also bet them at their place

And I wonder how much money UNT made off that Indiana game. People love to bring up scheduling, but no solutions as far as making money. People keep forgetting the key word in money games. MONEY!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And I wonder how much money UNT made off that Indiana game. People love to bring up scheduling, but no solutions as far as making money. People keep forgetting the key word in money games. MONEY!

Apparently you didn't listen to the podcast with RV. We start getting 28k a game into Apogee and we don't need money games.

Beating P5 teams during a bowl season is the way to increased attendance.

Hopefully something changes with scheduling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently you didn't listen to the podcast with RV. We start getting 28k a game into Apogee and we don't need money games.

Beating P5 teams during a bowl season is the way to increased attendance.

Hopefully something changes with scheduling.

Its a vicious cycle. Money games we lose which doesn't help attendance. Low attendance means more money games. If we got rid of money games we might win more which would drive up attendance. If attendance goes up we don't need money games. So, either we have to win some money games to drive up attendance, or RV needs to take a risk and get rid of money games to give the team a better chance to compete for better records to drive up attendance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't want to make an all or nothing statement. Having Wake Forest schedule a home and home with us would be nice. Much like scheduling Indiana was nice. That said it pales in comparison to how important signing a 10 year deal with SMU and Army will be for the program. We of course can have both.

Edited by HoustonEagle
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok schedule a 1 and 1 with Wake Forest...25k shows up. How much money is that? Schedule another 1 and 1 with Miss state and we play them on the road. We may come out 1 & 1, beating Wake at home and losing to Miss State on the road. Does the Wake victory at home spike attendance? Does it make people want to buy season tickets?

Schedule a money game against Texas and make about 700K or more. Bring in a weak school like Idaho or Nichols. Attendance is 23k. Record 1-1. Lots more money though. It's not close either.

Until the fans and community steps up, the program will continue to need money games. Not just for football, but the whole athletic department. Football is the biggest chance to make money for the department, and that money pays for the other non revenue sports.

I have not seen a solution on here that replaces the money lost by eliminating the money game. We are talking about turning down guaranteed money and hoping the fans and donations step up. That is horrible from a business standpoint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or you get a team like Coach Mac is establishing, a hard nosed football team, and you then go to these money games and hopefully kick their butt and take their guaranteed money like Temple did last night!! That gives you both, attendance when you come back home and the money! I just wish football could keep more of it and do other things to help continue the growth!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wake forest is a better get than Indiana. I don't think anyone on here is asking for wake forest specifically, but we need more games like this. Kansas, Iowa State, Colorado or even someone like Texas Tech who plays @ tx st and utep. Doesn't have to be A&M, just something better. There's no reason we should playing a 2 road game series with Iowa.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

ULM didn't really "take down" Wake. They were already down.

"Take down", meaning ULM won the game by one point or fifty, they won the game.

And we ended up with Nichols State as our 4th game of the season. Whoopee! If you have to play an FCS team, make it the first game. Sheeeeesh!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2015 is bad, but I couldnt think of two better opponents to play THIS year, other than Texas on a year they are beatable and a local rivalry SMU as the first home game.

those two games alone are creating lots of pub for the program. A close loss to Texas would create much more buzz than a win against a weak out of state P5 school.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.