Jump to content

The Case For And Against The Wac


MeanGreen61

Recommended Posts

Here is my source. Where did you get your numbers from? Not Being smart just curious because that looks of by a large margin.

THE POTENTIAL REPLACEMENTS

CAL POLY

San Luis Obispo, Calif.

Budget: $11.4 million

Sports: 20

Classification/Conference: FCS/Great West

TV Market: 120

Football record last 5 yrs: 35-22

Avg. football attendance (2009): 9,588

Avg. men's basketball attendance (2009-'10): 2,165

Pluses: California location.

Minuses: No timetable in place to move to FBS.

Hawaii fact: The late Stan Sheriff's alma mater.

MONTANA

Missoula, Mont.

Budget: $13 million

Sports: 14

Classification/Conference: FCS/Big Sky

TV Market: 166

Football record last 5 yrs: 59-10

Avg. football attendance (2009): 24,417

Avg. men's basketball attendance (2009-'10): 3,382

Pluses: Strong FCS playoff tradition in football. Led FCS in attendance.

Minuses: Yet to decide if it will pursue FBS membership. Might be tied to Montana State in 2-for-1 deal

Hawaii fact: UH is 4-1 against the Griz in football.

NORTH TEXAS

Denton, Texas

Budget: $16.7 million

Sports: 13

Classification/Conference: FBS/Sun Belt

TV Market: 5 (Dallas)

Football record last 5 yrs: 10-49

Avg. football attendance (2009): 18,228

Avg. men's basketball attendance (2009'10): 2,716

Pluses: Already FBS member. Texas location, major facilities upgrades, including new 30,000-seat stadium to open in 2011. Possible travel partner for Louisiana Tech.

Minuses: Turned WAC down six years ago. Preference is Conference USA. Football in down cycle.

PORTLAND STATE

Portland, Ore.

Budget: $10.5 million

Sports: 15

Classification/Conference: FCS/Big Sky

TV Market: 22

Football record last 5 yrs: 22-33

Avg. football atttendance (2009): 6,082

Avg. men's basketball attendance: 1,009

Pluses: Oregon location and major hub.

Minuses: No timetable to go FBS.

Hawaii Fact: June Jones transferred to PSU after leaving UH.

SACRAMENTO STATE

Sacramento, Calif.

Budget: $15.8 million

Sports: 20

Classificiation/Conference: FCS/Big Sky

TV Market: 20

Football record last 5 yrs: 20-36

Avg. football attendance (2009): 9,935

Avg. men's basketball attendance (2009-'10): 680

Pluses: California location and proximity to Nevada, San Jose State and Fresno State.

Minuses: No timetable for FBS membership. Facilities lacking.

Hawai'i fact: WAC associate member in baseball.

TEXAS STATE

San Marcos, Texas

Budget: $19 million

Sports: 16

Classification/Conference: FCS/Southland

TV Market: 48 (Austin)

Football record last 5 yrs: 36-24

Avg. football attenndance (2009): 12,488

Avg. men's basketball attendance (2009-'10): 1,654

Pluses: Texas location for recruiting. Possible travel partner for Louisiana Tech.

Minuses: No timetable for FBS membership.

UC DAVIS

Davis, Calif.

Budget: $20.5 million

Sports: 23

Classification/Conference: FCS/Great West

TV Market: 20 (Sacramento)

Football record last 5 yrs: 27-29

Avg. football attendance (2009): 9,908

Avg. men's basketball attendance (2009-'10): 1,748

Pluses: California location and proximity to WAC members Nevada, San Jose State and Fresno State. Best fit academically.

Minuses: No timetable for FBS.

Hawai'i fact: UH President M.R.C. Greenwood and Manoa Chancellor Virginia Hinshaw both held positions at UC Davis.

FBS: Football Bowl Subdivision (formerly known as Division I-A). FCS: Football Championship Subdivision (formerly known as Division I-AA). Sources: Individual schools and Star-Advertiser research.

http://www.staradver...s_got_Next.html

Well, TSUSM data was strangely not included in the NCAA data base. so I used a bias source a San Marcos newspaper: www.sanmarcosrecord.com/sports/x1048581371/The-state-of-Bobcat-athletics-Budget-and-salaries-

Apparently this link does not work, but it is easy to find. Do you really think TSUSM is spending that kind of money in the Southland? It looks like some pretty sloppy research by the Star; For example, it lists NT with 13 sports; any FB division school has to have 16. The term budget is also pretty nebulous; maybe it is including capital costs in TSUSM's number. At least the NCAA data has some breakdown to components.

I applaud UTSA and TSUSM desire and progress toward moving up. I think both schools are hindered by their proximity to each other and most fans don't know what a challenge it is going to be. The beginning of any project is usually the time for wild enthusiasm. As time marches, on the task can look much more challenging. The fun of announcing big series with name schools and pontificating on the great attendance and support your team will garner could easily fade as your team is clobbered and those big envisioned crowds never materialize.

Edited by GrandGreen
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you really believe that then why are you trying so hard to convince us to join you in your plight?

Because I see UNT, TXST and UTSA becoming good rivals one day. Although many of you look down on our program we are well positioned to become a good FBS program. Our program is on the rise and I would like for us to join a conference wit instate rivals. I am not foolish enough to think CUSA is going to look to add additional teams from Texas any time soon. I really feel the WAC with an Eastern Division of UNT, TXST, and UTSA would be able to rival the SMU, UTEP, UofH and Rice of CUSA. As for Schedules three of your four division mates would be in State. I wish nothing but the Best for UNT but I think you guys could do better than sitting on your hands in the Belt waiting for a call from CUSA that may never happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because I see UNT, TXST and UTSA becoming good rivals one day. Although many of you look down on our program we are well positioned to become a good FBS program. Our program is on the rise and I would like for us to join a conference wit instate rivals. I am not foolish enough to think CUSA is going to look to add additional teams from Texas any time soon. I really feel the WAC with an Eastern Division of UNT, TXST, and UTSA would be able to rival the SMU, UTEP, UofH and Rice of CUSA. As for Schedules three of your four division mates would be in State. I wish nothing but the Best for UNT but I think you guys could do better than sitting on your hands in the Belt waiting for a call from CUSA that may never happen.

Not that we are looking down, but that we are looking up. Like it or not, Tx. St. is not on UNT's level, and it should be UNT's mission to make sure they never are. Just look at your comparison thread of athletic budgets. Just about every single school in there is FCS. Kind of an insult to compare UNT to FBS schools, no?

Some of us are trying to go forward, not backward, and step back into the old Big West is an unbelievable step backwards, as is joining any conference with any plan to incorporate a FCS team into the mix. We are in that conference now. We are looking to get out of that conference.

And for those who are looking forward to a rivalry with TSU or UTSA, could you please, please, please, set your sights just a little higher?

I swear, it's like the parent of a child being satisfied with a 6th grade education for that child.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently this link does not work, but it is easy to find. Do you really think TSUSM is spending that kind of money in the Southland? It looks like some pretty sloppy research by the Star; For example, it lists NT with 13 sports; any FB division school has to have 16. The term budget is also pretty nebulous; maybe it is including capital costs in TSUSM's number. At least the NCAA data has some breakdown to components.

I applaud UTSA and TSUSM desire and progress toward moving up. I think both schools are hindered by their proximity to each other and most fans don't know what a challenge it is going to be. The beginning of any project is usually the time for wild enthusiasm. As time marches, on the task can look much more challenging. The fun of announcing big series with name schools and pontificating on the great attendance and support your team will garner could easily fade as your team is clobbered and those big envisioned crowds never materialize.

The data you'll find is TSU's old budget. They passed an athletic fee to boost the budget, and that is now kicking into effect. So, yes, TSU's budget is in the $19-20 million range. Which is another reason why we need to make sure we embrace them, or keep ahead of them. <_<

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't this the scene in Citizen Kane where Kane is forcing himself to applaud for his girlfriend's very pathetic singing performance? NOT because he really believes that she can sing, but because his ego won't let him admit that he is wrong about her.

Hmmmm, :rolleyes:

You are very observant, even at 6:30am!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Tell a friend

    Love GoMeanGreen.com? Tell a friend!
  • What's going on Mean Green?

    1. 4

      Women’s Basketball Signs Four Experienced Transfers

    2. 6

      Any word on Buggs?

    3. 12

      You've heard of Hook 'em, Gig 'em, Wreck 'em, Sic'em, what about...

    4. 0

      SB at Charlotte (5/3-5/24)

  • Popular Contributors

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      15,381
    • Most Online
      1,865

    Newest Member
    KeithSHU
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.