UNTcrazy727

After watching the press conference I don’t think the QB competition is over. After saying “Stone will probably go out with the ones”, Morris immediately says we will see Rogers play. I don’t think Morris is comfortable rolling with one guy 100% until he sees how they perform under the pressure of a real game.

My favorite:

SMU might lose both those games but win everything else. Agree that UTSA has no chance at winning 12. Playing in CUSA has made people think they’re better than they really are. They are 4-4 vs FBS competition outside CUSA the last 2 years.

Technically, it’s a Fanatics email. Since games start next week I’m guessing it was an automated email that went out to every school they’re licensed to sell. Laziness on their part.

They obviously didn't feel that way a couple years ago when they had the chance to take UNT, UTSA, and Rice but declined. That's going to come back to haunt them.

From what I've seen on social media and messages boards (far from official), I think most UTSA fans consider us their main rival.

Yep...games like Georgia vs Georgia Tech, Florida vs Florida State, Iowa vs Iowa State, and Clemson vs South Carolina will probably start being cancelled as the number of conference games increases.

This guy is a total clown. Zero credibility.

I tried to pick a win and loss not many people are expecting. Tulsa is my unexpected loss and Memphis is the win. I agree, we should beat Tulsa, but as we know, things never go according to plan.

Because people like attention and up votes.

That’s kind of where I was going. I think most people go to the Eagle’s Nest for current event, university, and political discussion. A lot of non UNT CFB threads get started in the Mean Green football forum. If we want to keep it clean, I think a general CFB forum would help. Just my two cents.

I think what he is saying is the right thing to do is to contain the discussion to one thread under the Mean Green football forum. Not have it separated in its own forum.

If Admins are willing to move VERY relevant UNT football threads to a different forum, can we finally get a generic "College Football" forum so non-UNT topics aren't posted in the "Mean Green Football" forum? Maybe after things get settled with the Pac 4 just rename the realignment forum to something more CFB generic?

Would have preferred the standard battle flag. Oh well

Considering they were coming off an upset win over #14 Washington and on the verge of being ranked, this was one of the most disappointing crowds I've ever been a part of. Great example why they were left behind.

Get ready to be disappointed 😞

Because the AAC is the better league...stronger teams, has the richer TV deal, and would give WSU and OSU more exposure across the country. The AAC could establish divisions that would limit how much WSU and OSU travel east of Texas.

Look forward to trying this after missing the whole first quarter waiting in SMU’s concession lines

Wait, you think potentially being in a division with SMU, UTSA, Tulsa, Rice, Stanford, Cal, Oregon St, and Washington St is unappealing? Im at a loss for words…

But what are Memphis and SMU at risk of missing out on? If they say no to leaving the AAC the PAC will have to absorb the MWC and take whatever crumbs are left in the TV/streaming market. It won’t match what we have with ESPN. I think it’s different because Colorado lost faith in the PAC leadership to get an TV deal and decided to get a piece of the Big 12’s sweet new deal. Right now, the AAC has the best, most long term TV deal of the 3 conferences in question. Why risk leaving to essentially start a new conference that needs a new TV deal in a market that’s dried up? Sure, ESPN could reduce the AAC’s payouts if there were defections to help make a play at this new PAC/MWC/AAC merger, but wouldn’t it be a whole lot easier to push the PAC leftovers to join the AAC?

I don't think FSU and Clemson leave if the ACC agrees to reconstruct their TV agreement to give them a bigger share. FSU's main complaint right now is schools like Wake Forest and Boston College get the same amount as money as they do. ESPN has obviously told them adding Stanford and Cal will increase their money. Otherwise, they wouldn't be voting on it.

If the rest of the ACC agreed to change the TV payouts so FSU and Clemson get a bigger share I bet they'd be more inclined to vote "Yes" on expansion.

Sure. But to say there hasn't been a vote is disingenuous. An official vote won't happen until its known there are enough "Yes" votes.