There is no enforcement entity since the courts made the NCAA a lame duck in regards to pay for players. It's totally highest bidder now for players, and no work needed to be done except show up on your new team/school. Until the members decide a new ruling structure and what rules they now want to follow. The pay will eventually be taken over by the schools and probably limited then per a labor-type contract.
Not being transphobic = decades of scientific literature.
Being transphobic = fake cowboy memes and pictures of masculine east german athletes.
Some of the best advice my grandparents ever gave me was to never stop learning after school was over with, and you guys are proof of how hateful and close-minded one can get when you don't follow that advice.
This is always the excuse for athletics expenditures and it is certainly a valid justification. However, it is also impossible to quantify the benefits.
There are only 134 D1 football teams and obviously there is substantial value in being a member of that group.
Playing time (or NIL with some) is huge, but factors have to be different with each player. Which was encouraged to stay, which to go, which by family members or friends; did academics or location play a part? Every situation is probably different.
At what point as a coach to you tell a marginal player to stay or look elsewhere? Roster makeup is important and also factors in these decisions. If you're 7th on the guard depth chart probably not a good situation.
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.