outoftown

htat sure was a decent drive

yes great pass and catch

ok first stop. now if we only had an offense

we downed it at their 2.... that is about the first time anything positive happened

http://apps.ohlulz.com/ncaa/?lulz=rtmp://cp98724.live.edgefcs.net:1935/live&id=hou_m-footbl@32065

Because if you look at FAU, that don't make you wish to be in a conference with them. Also let us look a few years what GA state does in the sun belt, before inviting them. And finally: I am just not a lover of 16 team conferences. 14is more than enough in my book. at 16 you pretty much never see the other division in football.

UNT 24 Houston 21 Olen wins it on a 35 yard FG as time expires. No don't say that was not specific enough

And I thought they might put SMU on the waiting list this week I think we are safe for at least another week right now. on another note: ...and we thought the schedulde was kind to us when we missed out on playing FIU

ESPN s analysts are not that bullish on the Sun Belt: If I counted correctly they project 2 / 3 teams in Bowls... I do get the feeling though that they are not really doing their homework well and are underestimating.

Well with all the ineligbile teams this season, it is hard to see teams getting left out if they do get eligible. At some point bowls might not have another option but to take a eam from the belt, even if there are no tie ins. That said, the sun belt would have to get 6 eligible, and even with the good play this OOC season, I got a hard time seing that. 5 Seems possible though. FIU for example has a hill to climb to get eligible

Dio mio we are doomed

You think that will work? Maybe for LSUs or Bamas, but say for Houston, SMU, Ole Miss etc, even if they schedule tough non-conf, do they really have a shot at the 4-team playoff? Don't think those kinds of programs get much incentive to schedule up.

While their competition was bad so far I still think they might quite possibly get to 9-3... after all they still have some teams on their schedule that... well....are not impossible to beat, even for a team that is not very legit: Rice, Tstate san Marcos, Idaho and McNeese state. These teams are a combined 3-10 vs FBS competition and 3-2 vs FCS (and it would look worse without MCNeese in the group). luckily there are some NCAA provisions from getting bowl eligible with that kind of schedule

Impressed on how you put it together on the video.Largely true. Doesn't help us win our next game though

In a way this game is a bit of the opposite of the one against troy, where we actually played better than the oposition in many ways, but couldn't get the W, while this time we did not really play better than the opponent, but managed to get the W.

After he was taken out last week for not getting two above 40yarders in, he came back strong this week, and it was very important. Should be a real confidence booster, for him and for Macs trust in his special teams. This clearly was our best special teams effort of the season so far (Ok that doesn't take much)

Saw it too... clearly football does not need defense for its entertainment value

UNT 31 FAU 17

So apparently this is why Stojkovic redshirted: read more at http://^http://meang...stojkovic.html/ Can anyone who knows the law better than I tell me what is exactly meant when they talk about "misdemeanor assault" ?

I do not wanna take anything away from Y'Barbo... but since Cyrill Lemon is my adopted player I feel compelled to disagree with you

Don't be afraid: SMU will make the list right after getting shellaked by TCU

I was hoping not to see a lot of this kind of recognition anymore http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/page/bottom10120926/unscripted-drama-all-bottom-10 As had to be feared, NT-FAU is this weeks Pillow fight of the week, and NT also made the waiting list

Congrats to Mister T. Hope the gift will be loads of TD-passes against FAU

So i was looking at the bowl projections this week. Of course I know I should not do this. it is week 4 and all and way to early etc. Well I did it anyway. http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/bowls/predictions http://espn.go.com/college-football/bowls/projections I could not quite help being surprised at how differently people see certain things: The guy on CBS sports sees 5 Sun Belt teams in Bowls (but only 4 C-USA), while one guy on ESPN sees only the minimum of 2 (but 6 C-USA)! When it comes to surprising consistency: everybody still seems convinced that 1-3 Arkansas will go bowling after a grueling SEC season, I admitt that one puzzes me. Personally I think that 6-6 teams are improbable to not be chose this season, seing all the ineligible teams out there. What is ya'lls take. If we scrable to a 6-6 will we get in (and yes I believe it is still a realistic possibility that we make that)?

At least you are consistent, and optimists are sure a thing this program needs right now. I still think a 5-7 or 6-6 season is realistic (my but is on the record at 5-7 before the first game, but I actually through 4 games saw a team more talented than I had thought). But Chico, DT and Mac need to have a come to Jesus meeting and figure things out and Coach riddle is maximally one bad special teams game away from getting fired. That said, looking just at the stats we should have won the game and have what it takes in place to win most of the games left on the schedule if we show up only halfway at QB. And Jimmerson is still special, the Defense actually had it's best effort of the year, got really only burned once.