I'm not sure of the "different demographic" that you refer to. In any case: If you are talking about a "different demographic" of students then the law schools in Texas do a fine job with diversity. It is a misnomer that law school classes are filled with rich kids. Vast majority of law students rely on scholarships and loans to pay for law school, not daddy. UNT Law is not necessary to allow diverse students a chance of attending law school because cost will be covered with loans are preferably a scholarship which provides any student an opportunity to attend law school in Texas. If you are mean "different demographic" to represent targeting different branches of society for legal services, I can assure you that the Texas law schools are already doing this. Most law students are not going to be working for "evil corporations" and will be servicing local businesses or doing small family, personal, or criminal law. UNT Law is necessary to service the latter. If by "different demographic" you meant pro bono for low income, many top students at top schools see public interest law as a calling and flock to it in high numbers, again UNT Law is not necessary for this. I do not think a false elitist jealousy bubble has anything to do with a common sense and reality based view point that UNT Law is not necessary and will straddle its students with debts with little to know job prospects to pay off the debt.