MeanGreenHoops

You see to have the polygamist view of a "couple years." 😛

Solid defense on the play. I do miss watching him play tho.

Another shooter. When Smart/Duffy aren't scoring this team looks bad. Another shooter. For when the backup to Smart/Duffy isn't scoring. A big. To take up space and defend the post. Someone with a post game. OK that's 4 :)

Seriously? What a waste of money

Thanks for this.

Don't be surprised. On the football boards more than a few thought our true freshman QB wasn't good enough and might lose his job as a sophomore. Turned out he was All-Conference as a Soph. Seeing talent and keeping that in line with reality of experience etc. isn't a strength for all folks.

Nice post. I wish you posted more these days. Too bad you were Benford'd

The team is 4 players short of being at the top of CUSA. The fact there is only one player that can score (Smart) makes the record commendable. Woolridge would be fine if surrounded with 3 other threats (besides Smart). The fact Draper gets heavy minutes tells you all you need to know, He is a liability everywhere especially defense except for he can hit an open three. He'd be a good 6th man on a great team ala Tim Duryea from back in the day. The interior defense and athleticism of the team is way behind the top teams in the league. McCaslands 1st season reminds me of Litrells. He took a terrible team and made them competitive by figuring out strengths and weaknesses and getting buyin. Exactly what a good coach would do, but it caught up to both of them at the end of their 1st season. The main difference though is McCasland was able to change over half his team and doesn't have many scholarships to give to make an improvement. If he can recruit he can challenge at the top. That's the next step. Sounds familiar.

That puts @BillySee58 on the clock for his grading report on the class.

Before any other statues are put up at Apogee, this should be commemorated first.

Oops, you are right. I have more than 4 so I didn't do the math. Welp then the $200 per seems fair. For the record, mine went up on average, but I've no problem paying it. Can't want to be good, but not financially support it if you can.

Actually, I need to correct this. It used to be $500 for up to 4 in Section 105 and $1,000 for up to 8. So if you had 5 seats you paid $200 per seat but if you had 8 you only paid $125 on average. They raised it to $200 per seat regardless now in that section. So they basically went to the highest end of the average and went with that. My opinion on this is it is too soon and should have been more like the low end of $125 or a slight bump to say $150 a seat. But, I still think it makes more sense.

It is. $200 a seat in 105. Actually they way they are doing it now makes more sense. It used to be like $250 would get up to 4 seats and then $500 would get up to 8 or something. So depending on how many seats you had it could have been a deal (say 8) or a lot more (say 5) in the same seats. Per seat makes more sense. Another thing RV did wrong. Either way though it is going up but it at least makes sense now.

The has to be the heyday of the NT Daily. Just clobbering the DRC at the moment.

We'd be Oklahoma, if only we were a few inches taller.

Depends. I don't blame them for waiting for on Benford's last year, it was the previous 3 that shouldn't have happened.

Interesting thoughts. I'm basically the same as Army of Dad. For me, it actually had to do more with removing my emotional attachment to it since it was painful. Maybe lame. But it happened to me. I think it also happens to a lot of folks you see on here over time. I don't think I went crazy and started just spewing hate on here about everything the school is doing, however my investment in the program now is no longer emotional. That means I no longer feel obligated to go. That doesn't mean I won't go again, it just means I will probably wait until there is more reason than they don't suck anymore.

This should be the tag line for UNT. UNT Football - We'd be Oklahoma if we were a few inches taller.

Sorry for the late reply but been busy. I said B-. It's real hard to do these since you tend to compare to what we've had as basketball coaches. I won't rehash the points others have made, but we haven't had an A hire that I know of in the last 30+ years. The coaching end is above average. They have a plan and they are trying to execute it. On that alone it's probably a B+. But I agree with @Cooley that the recruiting especially with as many spots as they had was underwhelming, so I went with B-. Interestingly it's similar to Football. Doing more with less, but until someone can coach and recruit we won't be making big waves.

To be fair, there's no way there are 5,000 SMU fans in Texas

I'll give you a hint. M$ney

Since there are only about 16,500 seats available during construction, that's a lot of people in standing room only (not a shot at you're attendance guessing skills)

So is UNT basketball dead to you now? It kind of died for me, but I'm considering resurrecting it.

This article is hilarious. He states the obvious and gets the expected response. If you're good at coaching other teams will want you. Thanks for the insight but we already knew that. Not much there. It's more like he read about the fears of gomeangreen.com and then wrote an article about them. He got the desired response. I'd prefer he did better at actually finding things about our team ... like did you all know Trevor Moore has a torn MCL he's been playing on for several weeks? I didn't but they mentioned it on the broadcast which I watched last night. This is not the 1st time I leareed some detail about the team from TV that I thought we should have already known. This is the kind of detail that the hardcore fanbase here would like to get from the local man on the scene.

It's not just last year it was the previous 5 years. It made me give up season tickets, give up going at all, give up even paying attention to when we had a game.