First: I will believe Navy will not chicken out and really play in the AAC when I see them on the field with the logo on their chest.
Then: yes there may be a bit more recognition at the top of the AAC, but it is not the kind of recognition that gets recruits panties wet, nor the kind that gets you thousands more spectators in the stands.
The two things you say are not about to change much for the better for the AAC. Their tv contract is clearly better than C-USAs.... but it is brand new if i recollect correctly. The problem is more that C-USA s contract will come up and with the new membership it might get a worse one (or it might not, hard to say right now, but the timing for C-USA seems more favorable than it was for the AAC who did the tv deal in the middle of realignment insecurity).
The bowls... well I guess the fat lady has not entirely sung there yet, but even the guys on the AAC fan boards opined that Banowsky thoroughly wiped the floor with Aresco when it comes to bowls, and with the new contract period starting next year...
The main problem with staying in C-USA is more that if the AAC asks someone like southern miss or let's say Marshall, they might jump to be with their 'old rivals'. If C-USA manages to remain together for 2-3 years without any bad noise about someone leaving, then I think the conference will erase a good bit of the perception deficit it has against the AAC.