El Paso Eagle

Agree to disagree. Across this board not only hirings here but other places when Baylor coaches are mentioned there are always people complaining they should not get hired again It has been reported that in vetting TW the University checked his references and contacted 12 people. How much is enough? I guess you can always say if something went wrong the process was not good enough

There are probably many here who think the Duke Lacrosse team was not punished enough.

So, you’re saying the department head call previous employers and references? Highly doubt they let the person interviewing and making the decision to hire also verify the background. But again, you are in the group who believes all things Baylor Coaching are bad.

They do the vetting for all hires or are blamed when one gets in trouble?

It has been mentioned. On this board ever time a coach who was at Baylor at the time is mentioned there is divide. There are many here who seem to believe anyone who coached at Baylor during that time should never be allowed to coach again. As far as vetting, is that on Seth or the HR department? Do Department heads vet the new professors and then get questioned if one of them has troubles?

It was not the DC job at Texas, it was the LB coach

From what I have seen Herm Edwards wanted PB to stay and coach for him. One of the things you hear about Edwards how he is good at surrounding himself with good coaches who are high quality people.

This PB is coming here and wants to be here. Think if Stoops had come it would have been "a job" while he kept looking. Could be wrong.

There are some people who will never be OK with a Baylor ex hire and that's their choice. It seems these days if someone doesn't agree with someone it does not matter the reason and instead on moving on they take every chance to tell everyone how wrong that person is and push the narrative that they should never be allowed to work again.

Not so sure Stoops was not approached but he thought he was going to get the Texas job. That did not happen. Guess he was not sure he wanted to be here

Just goes to show you that sometimes location plays a bigger part than facilities

https://footballscoop.com/news/at-last-mike-stoops-reportedly-has-his-new-landing-spot/

You know the focus always seem to be at what it takes to keep them in your North Texas. Maybe the question is why do so many kids want to leave Denton?

And player don't talk to coaches before they enter the transfer portal .... Thinking with all of the ways to communicate that there is a lot of "recruiting" that happens "unofficially"

Great news. Here's wishing him the best

Absolutely. I know many on here dislike Liberty, but if you want to act like they do not have a good team or that Hugh Freeze is not a very good coach go ahead. I was really hoping that he would take another job. SMU will be tough. Sonny Dykes has got that program rolling. He has done a great job getting transfers to come in and they seem to be working out well. Replacing Buechele will be key but at least on paper they seems to be reloading. The new DC hire will be interesting. I don't know enough about Missouri. Hopefully we catch them off guard.

Have to have your daily supply of Mean Joe "Greens"

For the higher quality items they could be served in the Mason Fine Dining section

Great memories of my Grandfather and watching Walter. He was a Master Carpenter and went in to work early. Was home when Walter was on. In "his house" there was no horse play when Walter was on. He sat in his chair and I would sit on the floor beside him. Great memories.

Seems odd especially when your starter was coming off a great season.

Seems like Wilson came in a just said goodbye to all except one. The article seems to imply he fired them and then said he would sit down with each one individually Wilson takes over, fires all assistant coaches at McNeese St https://www.iberianet.com/sports/wilson-takes-over-fires-all-assistant-coaches-at-mcneese-st/article_ed77b028-3a82-11ea-af5d-778c5024974c.html

Some will still be like this regardless -

Thanks. Noticed for MSNBC they rated the Website, not TV (did both separate for CNN and FOX). Let's just say there is a lot of personal subjectivity on both sides of these "rankings". At the end of the day it's getting harder to just find information and not opinions. Not sure if there are many news journalist left, just a lot of opinion writers

When you look at the rating for CNN this chart loses all credibility