Jump to content

BillySee58

Moderators
  • Posts

    11,824
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    138
  • Points

    55,180 [ Donate ]

Posts posted by BillySee58

  1. It's one thing to have quantity, but we need quality as well. We've seen 6 lineman get significant snaps this year. 1 of those lineman is a senior and 4 of them are juniors. We have 8 other scholarship lineman, but who knows if they will be adequate replacements once guys like Johnson, Lemon, and Y'Barbo leave after next year.

    I think Beard would have a really good chance to come in, redshirt, and take one of the potentially 4 starting positions that will open after Mckinney and the three 4-year starters leave after the 2014 season.

  2. It is a pistol because there is a deep back behind DT. I agree with Harry. I didn't like it last year for that reason that you mentioned. They know we're running the ball and who it's going to (the deep back).

    It seems like we haven't run much zone read since DT ran the ball into our bench and scared us half to death that he might've broken his throwing hand against Ball St. DT has had a semi-injury plagued career but nothing out of the ordinary for a qb who has played five years of D1 ball.

    Our best rushing performances have been Ball St and Idaho where DT's zone read keeps were making the defense have to account for more options. We need to do more of that, whether it's DT doing it or Berglund and Mcnulty coming in for a few plays here and there to do it.

    Except for teams that run the veer (triple-option) offense and pro-style teams with pro talent like Alabame, the best rushing attacks in the country are zone-read based offenses that at least attempt to use their qb to keep the defense guessing. We don't have Marcus Mariota at qb, but DT has been effective when called upon.

  3. It would serve us right for him not to get it. If this is truly the path they're going down then playing him week one was just about the stupidest thing Mac could have done.

    It's not worth the "I told you so." It would serve them right, but I'd much rather have Dajon for that extra year. If Brock and Mcnulty can handle the starter and backup duties next year then we could redshirt Williams next year. I'm not sure how much Connor means would like that, but he'd just have to deal with it.
    • Upvote 1
  4. Solid post.

    Simply put Mac is stubborn. He's going to go with the older experienced guys. He knows what he has in them, whether it be good, great, mediocre, or sub par.

    Buyers has been one of the big bright spots of this team this season.

    Bingo
  5. Great post. When we ran nickel last year buyers was the guy. We ran it more than Mac let off from what I remember.

    But Mac loves playing his experienced guys, upperclassmen, and returning starters. That makes it hard to know what we have on the bench. It also gives hope to freshman and sophomores on this roster who aren't getting much playing time.

  6. Nothing on Dajon Williams or Brock Bergland?.....

    Mac is setting up Dajon for a redshirt according to his presser today. He said he's been in and out of practice. Whether it's a legitimate injury or not, it seems as though the plan is for Dajon to get a redshirt. He also didn't travel with the team this last weekend.

    Not sure about Berglund though. A package for him would be nice, but I wouldn't expect it.

    • Upvote 1
  7. Yes, he did. Mostly played second string QB (he was slow as molasses, but had a rocket arm and good receivers like Shanklin). What makes you think DT won't sniff the NFL...there has already been some interest in him. He'll get a look-see for sure.

    DT has the same baseball-pitcher-esque long wind up that Tim Tebow was highly criticized for entering his nfl draft. Tim Tebow was also a Heisman trophy winner.
    • Upvote 1
  8. Side note, it appears Reinhardt is redshirting this year to cut weight and have him at a good weight for a tight end. He said on his twitter that he came in at 285 and he has gotten down to somewhere in the low 260s iirc with a goal of getting down to 250.

    I thought we'd see him moved to defensive tackle with our lack of size and depth at that position, not to mention Boutwell and Abbe graduating after this year. The coaching staff liked him at tight end enough to recruit him there and they still do. He could be quite the force wherever he ends up.

  9. This is what I was saying. Not quite the belldozer, but just a package. Not necessarily for short yardage, but just have a package for BB where we can give a new wrinkle to our stagnant running game.

    But yes Stan, it seems that good new ideas seem out of the question with our coaching staff. Coaches being stubborn has been the downfall of many coaches. Hope it isn't D-Mac downfall.

  10. Jones has been solid all year. He is our best cover corner. Also, sweet pickup by Pegram at 1:18 and good pass pro overall. We're giving DT the time, we should be throwing deep more.

    Also, the sack by LaFrance looks like the lineman were in slide protection and were leaving LaFrance to get picked up by a running back. If not either the center or the guard should've peeled back and picked him up when they saw they had no one to block on their slide side.

    • Upvote 1
  11. Actually our offense gets better every time we fall behind. It's not a coincidence that we have fallen behind in every game and then fight back into it. We play too conservatively, run into 8 or 9 man fronts and get get scored on, then we start throwing and move the ball. Idaho was an outlier because so they were so bad at the time.

    I have always been a run first guy, I loved dickeyball, but this isn't working. We obviously need to throw, and not just short routes to the flats and 1001 8 yard crosses. We need to throw over people and force those safeties back. Then we can run.

    We scored 21 in the second half, if we had scored 21 in the first Tulane would never have been able to score enough to beat us. Instead we wasted a half running into stacked fronts and punting.

    Good point. And I absolutely agree that we should throw more. Teams are running 8 in the box all the time, might as well make them pay.

    I'm as big a DT critic as there is, but I think we have a better chance if he is slinging it downfield.

  12. I wasn't being anti-Derek in my thread about using a running qb for the record. I know that isn't the only anti-DT talk you are referring to, just wanted to clear that up.

    I was proposing that we use some zone read to mix things up and add misdirection to our running game since running right at people isn't working. We should do more of that with DT, but I would like to see us out our running qbs in there to do that as well as make a throw to keep defenses honest against that wildcat.

    GOMG2013 is right. Dinking and dunking is helping our passing stats since DT is getting yards and completions from them, but they aren't helping our team a whole lot. Our scoring has not improved dramatically from last year, except for the Idaho and Ball St game. Defenses will stack the box unless we show that we can complete a pass 15+ yards down the field effectively. We have to throw more of those passes. If DT can't complete them so be it.

  13. Everyone is loading up. We can't throw over the top to force them back. Wildcat won't help because you kill the wildcat by moving up.

    Only way we can force them to play back is to throw over them. We don't seem to call those routes. I don't know if we'd t trust the line to hold, the wrs to separate or the qb to deliver the ball. But they are rarely being called and almost never being hit.

    Could a moving pocket with a real threat to run at qb help? Probably.

    DW has no redshirt year now. One snap burns a redshirt. If they are planning to hold him out and apply for a hardship waiver I think that is a bad plan.

    If they move up then you make the throw. That's the difference between having a fast qb back there instead of a guy like Brelan who is either going to hand it off or run it himself.
  14. Well guys, tough loss. Let me start off by saying this isn't a blame-everything-on-DT thread, or even a replace DT thread. While he isn't doing great our running game is clearly not doing anything. I didn't get to watch the game so I'm not sure if it was because they were stuffing 8 in the box or what, but our running game woes continue.

    So should we put in another qb to run a little wildcat for a change of pace every now and then? Not wildcat where you put a guy like Chancellor back there and he either hands the ball off or runs it. But a dual threat qb who does a little zone read and can actually make a pass here and there to keep the defense honest. I don't care who.

    Williams has already burned his redshirt barring an injury and Berglund looked very elusive in the spring, not to mention Mcnulty who has been a change-of-pace running qb in the past.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.