It sounded like they moved because he was ineligable to play in Oklahoma because he played at a school that was not in his district. They didn't go into that part of the story much as far as why he was playing in a different school in OK.
I think the main issue was if his family had actually moved to Southlake or not. They followed his dad around with a camera and it sure didn't look like they had moved. Their house in OK had been listed, buy not until the reporter had started asking questions to the Southlake AD in August. The supposedly moved back in April.
It looks to me like the AD filled out all the paperwork after getting all of the information from the family. I think the family was probably the ones who were the most misleading. You could say you are moving to Southlake, get a house, list your old house, and all the other requirements and then after you get all if the guideline boxes checked, "change your mind due to circumstances". Of course, there are two side to every story and the story was pretty biased that the AD was doing something shady when it looked like he was confused by the whole thing.
I just think that investigative reporter on channel 8 comes across as a arrogant jerk......felt like kind of a shock journalism piece.......but having said that, the cards do seem to be against Southlake.