glick1980

I don't think so. He obviously cannot read defenses or throw the ball out of bounds and takes too many sacks. If he can't read a college defense, he can't read a NFL defense.

Where the hell did they get these refs from? No wonder they have won 61 games in a row at home...

What is wrong with Edwards?

I will honestly be a little dissapointed if we lose tonight. I don't really expect us to win tonights game, but I think we can. I think it will be a pretty close game and I look for it to be a single digit loss or a UNT win. I think if we defend well and get to the line and hit open 3's then we can win. We need outstanding night's from every player that plays to pull it off. JJ has raised the expectations around here so much that our fans should expect a great game and a chance to win. We have a great team, a great coach, and a great system. We need to stay out of foul trouble and we need guys to help George on the glass. I am excited to see how it all plays out.

This was an awesome win, I couldn't be more proud of our team!

Is it me or does his arm look alot better than last year? I like the occasional shots down the field and for the most part he has put the ball on the money.

This team goes into games with a plan and executes that plan, it's like night and day!

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncb/preview2010/columns/story?id=5788744

When I see that lineup I think more of how we be at a huge athletic advantage against most opponents. Long on the outside and athletic at every position on the court.

Did we really win by about 20, and who performed well for us?

I just want to win games. Right now we are in the Sun Belt so I want to win games while we are in the Sun Belt. If we move to CUSA I want to win games while we are in CUSA. If we move to another conference I want to win games while we are in that conference. I just want to win.

We are building a $78 million football stadium. If we aren't going to offer competitive salaries and field a good team, why would they make such an investment in the football program?

Neinas: "You guys need a new coach" RV: "Yeah, we hired you to help us find the right guy" Neinas: "Where is my money?"

Reading is good?

I am sorry that you consider simple facts such as Auburns schedule blows TCU's out of the water as "hot air". I also have stated that Boise should get a chance to play for the championship if the chips fall that way because they have done a good job scheduling OOC games. TCU should not, they play nobody, at all. Oregon State @ 3-3 is by far the best team they have played. They will play a good Utah team later in the season, and that is all they have to hang their hats on.

LOL @ Baylor. They are going to lose the last four games of the season and finish 6-6, meaning that they would have lost to every single team in the Big 12 South, and won 3 games against the bottom feeders of the Big 12 North.

Don't tell me they can't find someone better than Tennessee Tech. I know in a year or two they have a series with LSU and that is great. Oregon State was a good idea and a pretty good team. SMU, Baylor and Tennessee Tech are horrible to put on a schedule when you are in a bad conference and your coach speaks about playing for national championships. They need to play a couple of high level BCS teams and a couple of mid-level BCS teams every year if they want to be mentioned in the national championship picture. I am all for them making a BCS game, I am just not for them in a national championship game when they play two teams a season that have a chance to beat them, two teams that are in the top 50, and 8 teams that are among the worst in college football. Boise State is another story, they have worked hard to play a tougher OOC schedule and they could possibly play for the national championship.

I never said the tough schools should schedule scrubs, but if that is what they want to do that is fine, they are still playing a much tougher schedule that TCU. It is not ok for TCU to go out and play an entire season schedule where they never play any team that is very good and claim that they are national championship contenders...

I hate the BCS and am not a fan of any of its conferences. I do however, have great respect for the SEC as a football conference. If we have a playoff I think that would be best, but I think that teams should compete regionally to decide who goes to the playoffs.

A team just loses a chance to play for a national championship and instead plays Utah. Yeah, they were dissinterested no doubt. Utah was also very prepared and played a great game, Alabama did not.

TCU did beat Oklahoma one year when OU didn't have a QB and was 8-5 I think. In 2008, however, TCU lost 2 games, to Utah 13-10 in a game in which TCU dominated (Utah beat up a disinterested Alabama team in the BCS) and was manhandled by Oklahoma 35-10.

I don't think the system is rigged, watch the damn games! TCU's OOC schedule is at best, marginally better than Auburn's is, and their conference schedule is lightyears behind. I don't understand the sudden urge to reward teams for playing in weak conferences. If this were the case TCU and Boise would be best suited playing in the worst conference they can be in. Again, I think Boise has done a great job with their OOC schedule, I don't think TCU has. A couple of years ago when TCU was playing Texas or Oklahoma OOC you didn't hear them in the national championship conversation did you? You know why? Because they were losing those games.

Once again TCU and Boise are in weak conferences, they need to schedule tough OOC games to be in the national championship picture. Team in the SEC don't, they are playing 6-8 teams in conference that are better than any teams TCU or Boise play on their entire schedule. I don't know what is so hard to understand about this. TCU or Boise would not win the SEC, not even close, so why put them into a national championship game ahead of these teams? I give it to Boise for at lease attempting to schedule tough OOC games, but TCU plays a weak schedule OOC and in conference.

Of course the SEC plays scrubs in the OOC, have you seen the conference schedule? TCU plays scrubs in the OOC and in conference. Auburn plays Miss. State, South Carolina, Kentucky, Arkansas, LSU, Ole Miss, Georgia, and Alabama. OOC they play Ark. State, Clemson, ULM, and Chattanooga. So what? I count 9 games that are going to be hard fought games that they have a chance to lose. TCU is going to play two games this season they have a chance to lose: Utah and Oregon State. The level of competition is not even close. TCU plays some of the worst teams in college football and they are getting rewarded for it. It is a joke for them to even sniff a national championship game as long as they schedule weak OOC opponents. If a team can make it through the SEC with one loss, that is a far greater accomplishment than going undeafeated beating New Mexico, Colorade State, BYU, Utah, San Diego State, Wyoming, Oregon State, Tennessee Tech, Baylor, SMU, Air Force and UNLV.

They also played a balanced schedule that is comparable to all the other NFL teams. TCU should not be in the national championsip conversation for one reason....They scheduled Tennessee Tech.....I have no problem placing a one loss Alabama team in the national championship over undefeated TCU when TCU's big OOC game is against a team that may finish above .500 in the PAC10. Boise State at least schedules tough OOC games, but they rely on these teams that they schedule to have great seasons to make them look better. I really have no problem putting Boise in this season, they have done all they can schedule wise. But TCU does not deserve to play in a national championship game with an OOC schedule cosisting of Oregon State, Baylor, SMU, and Tennessee Tech. Auburn will play 4 teams that are ranked in the top 15 this year, TCU will play one team in Utah that benefits from similar circumstances as them. To date, the only decent team Utah has played was 4-3 Pittsburg, whom they beat in OT.