Jump to content

DentonStang

Members
  • Posts

    705
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1
  • Points

    22,680 [ Donate ]

DentonStang last won the day on July 6 2023

DentonStang had the most liked content!

About DentonStang

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

DentonStang's Achievements

Mentor

Mentor (12/14)

  • Posting Machine Rare
  • Great Content Rare
  • One Year In Rare
  • Reacting Well Rare
  • Conversation Starter Rare

Recent Badges

428

Reputation

  1. https://youtu.be/U_Ya-r5qvRo?si=MpGA9jQ92kg66jQ1
  2. It was probably 20-25% BYU. They had a strong showing.
  3. They are both deeply flawed but the way this was all handled is very very strange, and the offense dysfunction is beyond just getting beat. BYU did not seem to be, overall, more talented, at least not significantly. Very strange.
  4. Why would Cal and Stanford take something like an 80% revenue cut to go to a non-P4 league. That's bananas.
  5. UNT possibly headed west? https://x.com/RossDellenger/status/1834204561562624058?t=mRSH8CKhXRTOUsfwCNQkww&s=19
  6. I didn't see anything that could be labeled an offense out of SMU. It was, however, offensive. You should look to pick up Preston Stone in the portal for next year
  7. Without knowing anything about these specific guys, teams do pay for depth/rotators/backups. Obviously not as much as starters.
  8. You're assuming they transferred for play rather than pay. Cashing in to ride the bench and get your degree is not a bad gig
  9. Go steal that guy at ACU. Well over 500 yards against Texas Tech. Also, Houston lost to UNLV. Ouch.
  10. Try or don't try. Some try and can't. Rice however has the money, and rich alumni, to be good. Dont get it. What's the point.
  11. Go read the titles of that guy's other unhinged videos. Pure clickbait, zero info.
  12. People say this kind of thing but put zero thought into how or why these decisions would be made. Why, in a millions years, would SEC ever add Texas Tech? Assuming they needed to add anyone, Tech is not historically great at football. They don't have a bigger following than any average mid tier state school. They have zero media market. They have zero local recruiting. It doesn't add any new territory for any of the above. They wouldn't generate anywhere near the revenue they take out, so they are worse than nothing. What reason are you concluding makes them the choice? Tech is one of the least likely schools to add to SEC from B12.
  13. The conference is pushing for OOC matchups to be no more than 1 total bodybag FCS type tune up and then only P4s for the rest to maximize media returns. Scheduling UNT will not happen for that reason.
  14. Over UTEP, under UTSA & Rice. Unlikely. I think Rice is dropping way off this year. https://x.com/CFBONFOX/status/1824521512403042564?t=DRcll6tGInzGlB8O68uoTQ&s=19
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.