Jump to content

97and03

Members
  • Posts

    7,952
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    83
  • Points

    65,780 [ Donate ]

Posts posted by 97and03

  1. 6 hours ago, Jonnyeagle said:

    An example would be moving Roderic Brown to Mazin’s down lineman spot instead of being the nose.  And them move Mazin to his natural postion of linebacker or outside edge so he can rush.

    Or playing Rausaw or someone else of similar size in Mazin’s spot. We seem to have lost all the former inside guys we had so I think it’s just Brown and Moore who are solid enough to play the nose tackle spot. LeBlanc, TaShon, and Enoch all gone. 

  2. I would say a big difference is the number of big DTs you need with only three down lineman. You still need some size at DE (as we can see having a 240lb DE in this system doesn’t work at all) but you don’t need six DTs around 300 to have sufficient depth like in a four-man front.  We should, however, have guys over 260 playing DE, imo. Mazin should be at OLB, as that would allow him to be a pass rusher and it would also be a more appropriate size LB to support this system. Our LB size might be as big of a shortcoming as our DE size. Maybe more? 
    The truth is that we probably had enough DL depth to run a hybrid system with more four DL but I think they made a conscious choice to reduce DL depth in favor of DB depth. Then when the three man front wasn’t working, we didn’t have enough depth with size to run four consistently. 

    • Upvote 1
  3. 13 hours ago, UNTcrazy727 said:

    If we had this start to conference play we'd probably be bowl eligible right now. The difference in difficulty between our conference schedule and SMU's (even UTSA's) is crazy. 

    image.png.7360ef1163e31870cb3867bd7c466217.png

    Now, we should have still made a bowl game, but the AAC did us no favors. 

    We lost to FIU and Navy and squeaked by LaTech early on. Why exactly do you think we would have magically been better against these teams?

    • Upvote 1
    • Thanks 1
  4. JD your defense of Craponi based on Bennett’s results make no sense because it was not based on facts.

    The year before Bennett took over we gave up a staggering 43 points per game. Phil came in 2021 and immediately got us to a very respectable 27.5 per game. And that was during a transition to a new season.  You claimed that he really didn’t settle in until his second season (as a justification for keeping Craponi) but his defense was worse in the second year at 31.5. I don’t understand your logic.

    • Upvote 3
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.