Jump to content

BFraz

Members
  • Posts

    20
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Points

    770 [ Donate ]

About BFraz

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

BFraz's Achievements

Apprentice

Apprentice (3/14)

  • One Month Later Rare
  • Week One Done
  • Collaborator Rare
  • Conversation Starter Rare
  • Dedicated Rare

Recent Badges

36

Reputation

  1. Huge transition year for the program. Expectations. GMG
  2. It’s actually a pretty good looking logo, but there’s got to be a better way to apply it to the helmets. Don’t really want to look like Oregon and would like the decal to look reasonable. The Texas with the SOW looks good from a scale perspective but I think having the state on your helmet might be a little gimmicky. It’ll be interesting to watch the athletic branding over the next few years in the new conference as we get more exposure.
  3. Uh oh…sounds like this one might have been brought up before LOL. Good then there will be all kinds of good history 👍🏼
  4. Totally agree. I’ll be curious to see how many teams the conference ends up with. It’ll be 14 with the merge, but do they add 2-6 more teams and if they do, which markets enhance the media package.
  5. If PAC12 is looking for DFW market and SMU stays the ACC course then our admin should at least pursue a conversation with key stakeholders. Especially if the media rights deal is significantly more than the AAC.
  6. Anyone know the history of how and when the Diving Eagle that is currently being used was chosen? I’ve also seen a very similar eagle on the tail of a Royal Australian Air Force squadron jet.
  7. Got the dub and hope the team continues to improve and make adjustments as there’s some tough competition coming.
  8. Just trying to keep it simple…3 vs 4
  9. I wish I had them as I would definitely share them 👍🏼 I imagine someone on here is a stat wiz or has some kind of “connection”
  10. Anyone have the defensive stats from last night that compare the success of the 4 vs 3 man front?
  11. Administration really needs to understand “profile” of UNT student in relation to athletic spectatorship.
  12. It takes decades to build a legitimate athletic program/ brand and UNT has failed in many decades to commit and the current school admin and city of Denton leaders are finally on board. Still a lot to navigate and probably the biggest rock is the Booster’s trust and willingness.
  13. Amazing stat pull here and thank you. Essentially, we have been .500 against our “level of competition” and not sure why we should have any different expectations. The facilities and brand are on a good strategic path, but that’s a lot of history to look at as it relates to on the field football performance. I hope the AAC media revenue will help push the bar, but there is no guarantee.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.