Jump to content

CMJ

Members
  • Posts

    24,107
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    106
  • Points

    59,435 [ Donate ]

Posts posted by CMJ

  1. 32 minutes ago, greenminer said:

    So, last 10 games are taken into account to hold it against USF, but the now-hypothetical winning streak and ranking would have been a non-factor.

    Unfortunate and dumb.

    It's just another bad loss for a team with few good wins.  Their NET ranking isn't close to being good enough to getting in off of that.

    • Upvote 1
    • Downvote 2
  2. 12 minutes ago, greenminer said:

    USF became ranked during the last 10 games of the season.  Does that get ignored, too?

    Does the committee freeze the rankings at WK16 and ignore anything that moves up/down after that?

    No, but they don't take the voted on rankings into consideration.  I remember the year a top 20 Gonzaga team got a 9 seed in the tournament. 

    • Downvote 1
  3. 3 minutes ago, greenminer said:

    Body of work vs. current quality of performance.

    If the committee says they want to use the AL bids to invite the next best teams based on quality of play RIGHT NOW, USF - currently ranked by coaches USF -  should be considered and the impact of those Q4 losses takes a back seat to how well they are playing RIGHT NOW.  IMO, USF clearly figured something out and is not the same team that lost those early games.

    But that's not what is going to happen.  The committee will look at all those middle major teams that carry good brand, with little to celebrate or hold against them, and find ways to put them in.  The easiest way to do that is to find mid majors with Q4 losses, even early ones like USF's that clearly are not indicative of how they are playing right now - and leave them out of the convo by holding those losses against them.

    Just my idiot 0.02, but when it comes to selecting teams, the committee is not consistent about basing their selections on body of work vs. current quality of performance.  And it can be super frustrating how it seems to (usually) work against the mid-majors.
     

    About a decade ago the committee dropped record in the last ten games as a criteria.  How you're playing right now doesn't play into how they select teams...at least not consciously.

    • Downvote 1
  4. 5 hours ago, HoosMeanGreen said:

    What is your definition of a run? 1-1?

    My guess is at least the semis.  I think it's possible we could make a run, but since we're probably gonna be facing FAU in the quarters, I wouldn't expect it.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.