Jump to content

Green Otaku

Members
  • Posts

    1,853
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5
  • Points

    38,365 [ Donate ]

Posts posted by Green Otaku

  1. 1 hour ago, outoftown said:

    Kliavkof got done as dirty by B1G alliance partner as bowlsby by SEC. Only I feel he should have been much more able to see it coming seeing as there had been some rumors the LA schools were deeply unhappy for a while. Also, I wonder if he is finally starting to see why the originally proposed 12 team playoff model was good. No way his new look pac 12 is going to get an autobid. But now everybody who is not B1G or SEC may get a lot less. There is some irony in how his arrogant hard stance completely overplaying the Pac12s hand will now F him. He cost the bottom 8 conferences -including 10 of his 12 schools- a much better access to the playoffs, and the chance to do that is likely never coming back.

     

    Which I do find odd. Everyone knows that the Pac and the B1G are basically tied at the hip, so to have one stab the other in the back came out of nowhere. If for some reason they announced that this was more of a merger with the majority of Pac teams joining, I wouldn't be surprised. Maybe UCLA and USC are just the tip of the iceberg. 

    • Upvote 1
    • Thanks 1
  2. 1 hour ago, GreenFlag said:

    I'm talking athletes, not mathletes. Both are fine schools. My point is NOT NEAR ENOUGH PEOPLE give a crap about football there, not even themselves. It is truly shocking to see the apathy. Take a look at attendance each game for each school. Their attendance counters and the SMU attendance counter are cousins by the way. As far as butts in seats my guess is that both Cal and Stanford were under 25K for the year.

     

    UCLA's is just as bad, they have a long history of student apathy. They do the same and count season ticket holders, the actual people in the stands looks way less. 

    https://247sports.com/college/ucla/Article/UCLA-Football-Analysis-of-UCLA-Footballs-Attendance-Under-Chip-Kelly-178886080/

    • Upvote 2
  3. 1 hour ago, GreenFlag said:

    The Big XII will poach the PAC, not the other way around. I've paid close attention to that conference since I attended the football game against Cal and the 15K people who cared to show up. Now that USC and UCLA are gone, here is the list of good vs not so good properties. Attendance at the not so good's is abysmal.

    Good: Oregon, UW, Utah, and the Arizona Schools.

    Not so good: Oregon State, Washington State, Cal, Stanford and Colorado.

     

    I see Arizona and Arizona State being poached by the Big XII.

     

     

     

    Stanford is the #6 school in the country, Cal is the #2 public school. Even though you may be talking about football performance their prestige carries a lot of weight. 

    • Upvote 2
  4. 2 hours ago, Tom McKrackin said:

    I think some of you, not all of you, need to step forward and admit you were very wrong about wanting UNT to join the Mountain West.  When USC and UCLA leave the Pac 12 will have to find replacements from the Mountain West which will further water down that conference.  Also AAC was very smart to pick off all the viable Texas teams and leave the Mountain West without any of the good ones.  I don't see any of the Big 12 teams being interested in a PAC 12 without USC or UCLA>

     

    You're reaching. Everyone who advocated joining the MW was speaking of joining that conference as it stands, and them losing teams would obviously change how people felt about joining. Most of us also felt with SMU in the AAC they wouldn't want to add another team in the same metro, we saw our chances of joining as slim. None of us were privy that 6 teams would be added, we all assumed it would be 3 to replace what they lost. 

     

    Did we pick the best scenario? At the time yes, we made a great choice to join the AAC. But if todays news turns out to be true, it's not out of the realm of possibility that we ended up making the wrong choice. 

     

    • Upvote 3
    • Haha 1
    • Sad 1
  5. 2 minutes ago, greenjoe said:

    Do we think there is a chance McBride comes back ?  I had crossed him off consideration.  I hope the green is greener here than elsewhere.  

    Possible if he doesn't like his options. He clearly wants a change of scene though, and he's been getting attention from name programs so I don't see it as likely. 

    • Upvote 4
  6. On 3/31/2022 at 10:04 AM, UNTLifer said:

     

    Would salivate at being able to grab either. Especially Linguard, he would give Abou a much needed push in practice and rest when he needs it. 

    • Upvote 1
  7. 1 hour ago, Tom McKrackin said:

    I disagree in that I don’t have a problem with us raising the head coaching salary or even the assistants.  It shows the world we are serious and not participating in the bargain basement program that we had here for far too long.  What I do have a problem with is the fact that Seth is not earning the money we pay him!

    Agree that we should be paying at the top of the conference, and it's good for our perception. However, are we really a serious program if we keep accepting these results? No one knows for sure if the AD had the ability to fire Littrell, only they know the finances, we can only assume his contract was a major road block. 

    • Confused 1
  8. 1 hour ago, texx2818 said:

    I will just make this clear, I don’t object to giving Mac a massive raise. I think he should be easily pulling in $1 mil, maybe $1 + 300K in incentives. I was simply saying I know a lot of people were weirdly okay with letting Mac walk over money (once again, statistically probably the best coach at UNT in either football or basketball) simply because we are hamstrung by the Littrell contract.

     

    It's not that people were ok with it, we are just realists. If a program is really willing to offer 2.7-3m range there is nothing UNT could do about it. I can see UNT countering with at tops 1.5-1.7m, but we would still be short. It has nothing to do with Littrell. 

  9. 3 hours ago, golfingomez said:

    i think had we have one guy that could drive to the basket consistently, it would have opened up a lot for our team, hamlet did this and his floater made him someone that defenses had to try and bring help on. 

    This year no one was going to try and double Bell down low, and he was the only one that would drive to the hoop

    Rubin Jones looked surprisingly good in the Texas St. game. It wasn't a part of his game I think I had seen before, hopefully they let him do that a bit more next year. 

  10. 1 hour ago, Clinetort said:

    I can't believe that Joe Golding would be one of the WOW candidates mentioned earlier.  

    If Mac was hired away and Hodge wasn't the next in line, that's definitely who I'd go for. You can just sense he is going to put a great program together at UTEP. 

    • Upvote 2
  11. 32 minutes ago, GMG_Dallas said:

    This right here. I've been wondering if UNT can include a salary bump when we move to the AAC to account for the increase in revenue/TV money. We get $500k in the CUSA. AAC teams get $7 million. Could Wren say, "hey, I can bump you to $1.2 million now, but once we get to the AAC in a year, I can get you another million with the extra TV money."

    Frankly, it'll be critical to use that TV contract money to do everything possible to remain successful in preparation for the next AAC TV contract in 2030.

     

    New members will likely be staggered with payouts meaning we won't get the full payout off the bat. No one knows what we will get but rumors are that it will be 2m and increasing every year. It also covers our entrance fee IIRC. 

    • Upvote 2
  12. 36 minutes ago, GMG_Dallas said:

    I mean, Mark Few has a reported salary around $2 million at Gonzaga. I'm sure he's turned down more to go elsewhere or at least could get more elsewhere if he wanted. Same with McDermott at Creighton at about $1.3 million. Not everybody is money motivated. You see it with pro athletes too. Some people are already making what they believe to be life changing money and are happy to stay where they are...

     

    Knowing the type of guy Mac is I feel like he would be advocating bumps for his staff first and himself 2nd if he stays at UNT.

     

     

    • Upvote 3
  13. 27 minutes ago, SMU2006 said:

    Could absolutely be a leverage play.  Its a business.

    SMU is willing to go to 5 years at $2.75m.  

     

    Those numbers don't make sense. He'd be getting more than Penny at Memphis for doing the same job as Jankovich. The expectation with that kind of salary is Sweet 16/Elite 8, what happens if he misses the tournament altogether? 

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.