Jump to content

TreeFiddy

Members
  • Posts

    3,062
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    24
  • Points

    12,065 [ Donate ]

Posts posted by TreeFiddy

  1. 32 minutes ago, GrandGreen said:

    Absolutely nothing

    Even if I had money to burn, I am not hypocritical enough to contribute to something I think is ruining sports

    I understand your point, but this stance is exactly what will be the death of programs like North Texas.  The programs, boosters, fans that truly embrace the idea of NIL will leap frog programs that don't.  For a case in point, look at how SMEWW has gone all in on NIL and leap frogged the competition and even bought their way in to the ACC.  We can complain about the way things are all we want, but it won't change anything. 

    If we don't support the new world order then blood will be on our hands when UNT gets left behind, but I am sure we will conveniently forget about that part when the time comes.

    • Upvote 3
    • Thanks 1
    • Puking Eagle 2
  2. 59 minutes ago, DentonLurker said:

    What has he said or done to make you think this? I haven’t seen anything to make me think that.

    His inability to prevent a mass exodus of productive players with remaining eligibility makes me think this. 

    I think they call the image below 'foreshadowing'.  😆

    image.png.214614291f653141c3c43b73de8e9484.png

    • Haha 1
    • Skeptical Eagle 1
  3. 5 minutes ago, emmitt01 said:

    I've noticed quite a few comments saying something along the lines of "we shouldn't even bother recruiting high school athletes, let's just hit the portal hard."   Here is my question to you:  How much are you willing to contribute to our NIL collectives???

    I assume everyone understands that getting the impact transfers, in this new world of moving to the highest bidder, requires our university to be able to bid with the rest of college football.   I mean, surely nobody would come on this board to complain about how we are losing players to schools that have strong NIL collectives while simultaneously refusing to contribute to the solution....because that would just make you look kinda ridiculous.  

    Using similar logic, what makes you think we can recruit impact players via HS without outbidding another school's NIL collective?

    If you believe we are able to recruit a higher level athlete via HS than the portal for the same amount of NIL money then HS recruiting seems to make some sense, but you are always at an elevated risk of losing the player once they show any sign of ability.

    If you go with the assumption we can only afford the same level of talent via the portal than we can via HS recruiting, at least the portal players are less likely to transfer again until graduation due to having to sit a year.

    Unfortunately, the reality is the only way to maintain or move up in the pecking order is with money.  Even when you hit on a previously unproven player they will immediately be gone if you can't pay to keep/replace them and will be stuck on the eternal treadmill.

    Not sure what the answer is but we need to get creative with NIL.  Going to have to go outside the box because it is pretty clear so far we aren't going to raise the necessary funds organically.

    • Upvote 3
    • Confused 1
  4. 11 hours ago, NM Green said:

    The Harris comparison is not far off. The Musers were talking this week that what you will have is a college pro league where Dillon Gabriel could realistically stay at OU making millions of dollars playing for the Sooners as a career. Harris would do that in a heartbeat. 

    It’s a new world and we have delicious assets attributes. Need to maximize our population, location and connections to rise above the Utah States, Fresnos Boises and Iowa States of the world. All fine institutions but we have many benefits to offer. Conference affiliation is very soon not going to matter much. Hire the visionaries and activators and watch us soar. 

    GMG

    image.png.ac8959d7c0429177b792fbfad051e056.png

    • Upvote 1
  5. The only person at risk of wasting our HC is our offensive coordinator masquerading as a HC.  He needs to learn the HC ropes quickly because the he showed up to begin the season completely overwhelmed and incapable of preparing a team to start the season.  It looked like he might have been turning the corner toward the end of the year, but now seems completely overwhelmed trying to keep his roster together.

    This offseason certainly won't bring stability with the amount of roster repair that has to take place.  Hopefully he shows up next season better prepared than this season.  I have my doubts.

     

    • Upvote 1
  6. The anti trust exemptions are going to be the key to all of this.  The amount of money that will line politician's pockets will no doubt be huge regarding this topic and I am sure big money will eventually win out and the athletes will ultimately lose this aspect, but they will win the right to get more money than they have in the past.

    If it truly becomes pay for play and players become employees I believe most universities will be forced to shut down organized sports and revert to intramural/club.  However, I doubt it gets to that point and they figure out a way to pay players enough to keep them somewhat content without being employees.  Going to be an interesting few years.

    For what its worth, most of the rest of the world's universities operate on the intramural/club model when it comes to sports, although Japan has recently embarked on an intercollegiate journey somewhat similar to the US model.

    • Upvote 2
  7. 3 hours ago, Dentonborn79 said:

    I think all portal entrants should be rated and assigned a grade, say Rogers is graded at a 80 hypothetically,an 80 grade has a compensation value of let's say 35000 dollars.,whatever school gets rogers has to compensate NT 35000, so schools don't lose entirely. This would help the smaller schools. hope that makes sense.

    You need to account for inflation.

    https://www.on3.com/college/north-texas-mean-green/football/2024/transfers/

    • Upvote 2
  8. 9 minutes ago, jtm0097 said:

    How did fall of 2023 go for us?

    1. Lost to FIU

    2. Lost to Navy

    3. Lost to the top 4 schools in the conference in competitive games.

    4. Lost starting QB, RB, WR, G, and C to the transfer portal.

    I need something positive to happen in 2024.

    This Sucks Season 3 GIF by The Office

     

    Craponi is keeping most of his guys out of the portal?

     

    💩

     

    • Upvote 2
    • Haha 1
    • Sad 1
    • Oh Boy! 1
  9. Multiple starting QBs at P5 schools now entering portal.  Big time money grab going on from more than just backups at this point.  It was all shits and giggles when P5 schools were poaching from the lower conferences, but now that they are poaching from each other I think it will changes things.

    Can't imagine BMDs are going to put up with this for too long before they realize this is just nuclear war and nobody wins (e.g. pro sports salary caps).  This will only spiral upward if controls are not put in place.

     

     

     

    • Upvote 6
  10. The LTTC seems more focused on big money donors and businesses. 

    The MGC appears to be initially focused on basketball and makes it easier for smaller donors to get involved via the payment mechanism.

    It would be really interesting/scary to see what our NIL budget is for average football/basketball player and compare that to the rest of the conference.

    I feel certain we are well short of where we need to be.

     

     

    • Upvote 1
  11. 45 minutes ago, Cougar King said:

    We're a high school yet have higher admissions standards, better academics, 5 times UNT's endowment, play in a P5 conference and have a Top 5 Basketball Team.

     

    Come on man lmao.

    At least we agree on the Coog high part.  Take away frito bandito pouring cash into the program and the Coogs would still be in the AAC. 

    Let's see how long boosters of programs like Hooston want to continue to pour money in trying to compete with the top 20-30 NIL programs.

  12. FFS, no he does not DESERVE another year, but knowing this cluster F of an athletic department and HFC he probably WILL get another year.

    Total Defense: DFL (130 out of 130)

    Scoring Defense: 128 out of 130

    Rushing Defense: DFL (130 out of 130)

    Red Zone Defense: 106 out of 130

    When Ron Mendoza would be considered an upgrade at DC, something has gone horribly wrong. 
     

     

     

    • Upvote 3
    • Lovely Take 2
    • Haha 2
    • Eye Roll 2
    • Downvote 4
  13. 16 hours ago, MeanGreenZen said:

    I’m a season ticket holder in the 200 level since Apogee/DATCU stadium opened.
    I’ve been on the fence the last few years about upgrading to the club level, but haven’t made the leap.
    I want to check out the club seats during a game before I make a decision. 
    Any club season tickets holders not going? I need 3-5 tickets for my family. Let’s make a deal. 

    You might reach out to @EagleRob

    Earlier in the year he had 4 club tickets available for each game.

    • Lovely Take 1
  14. On 11/17/2023 at 9:26 AM, VideoEagle said:

    I've finally had a chance to start reading up on the 3-3-5 defense. Someone - I forget who - asked me to explain why you use smaller linemen in a 3-3-5. Here's what I found from an article in the San Diego Tribune - "The defensive linemen in the 3-3-5 tend to be smaller and more mobile, their main objective not to rush up the field, but to tie up blockers so the linebackers and safeties can fill the gaps and make tackles." 

    I found this from a primer on the 3-3-5 from Throw Deep Publishing. 

    The primer is good and understandable for those of us not steeped in deep Xs and Os. You do need a base level of football understand to follow, but it assumes a pretty basic starting point. The primer is free, but the more in-depth training with videos is behind a paywall. Here's a link to the free stuff

    https://throwdeeppublishing.com/blogs/football-glossary/the-3-3-5-defense-an-in-depth-guide

     

    I assume Craponi only has access to the free content.

    • Upvote 2
    • Haha 4
    • Eye Roll 2
  15. Players that have already used their 1st transfer seem like a less likely candidate to transfer a 2nd time unless they want to lose a year of remaining eligibility.  This likelihood seems to only reinforce that we should be focusing more on the transfer portal rather than grooming a high school player to transfer out as soon as they show promise.

    Hopefully our next coach will make the portal more of a focus.

    • Upvote 2
    • Thanks 1
    • Downvote 2
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.