[NO ONE FROM THE CURRENT AD!]

4 hours ago, Cerebus said:

Serious question for @GTBGone: Any idea how the department is going to handle the production of content for the ESPN3 part of the new conference media deal?

Good question. It's gonna come down to the AD's and presidents....which means $$$. 

There are two schools in this league that are already ESPN3 ready and have been for years, WKU and MTSU. They have the trucks and production equipment. The league wants everyone to catch up by investing the money to do so. 

If they don't, get ready for WKU and MTSU exclusively and send the complaints to the chieftains of this league. 

But with the TV revenue becoming what is, do you really think the presidents will swallow less money from TV and turn around and spend more?

Not happening. 

5 hours ago, UNTLifer said:

1.  The person you asked offered to send you a message.   You declined.  They, for whatever reason, don't want this on the public forum.

2.  If, as your screen name would imply, you are about to be gone from your position on the AD staff, I would recommend just going.  Nothing good will come from arguing on this message board.  Just go.  From the looks of your screen name, you harbor some bitterness that you need to let time take care of.  I wish you nothing but the best in the future.

Gonna post publicly about it, then don't be scared to name names publicly. Don't want to post the names, cool. 

But don't get scared when your called out for evidence. 

[NO ONE FROM THE CURRENT AD!]

41 minutes ago, emmitt01 said:

Oh how I long to someday make detective. ?

Please tell me this is a bit.  If you actually do work for the (hopefully soon cleaned out) athletic department you are embarrassing it...a feat to be sure.

What's the bit again? I asked a dude to back up his claims with facts. I think that's called accountability, which this board been howling for. 

So when I'm met with stone cold silence to my question, simply tells me the truth is there is not a single instance to the initial claim.

how that turned me into the test tube child of RV....I'll let message board poo bahs answer that. I could care less. 

[NO ONE FROM THE CURRENT AD!]

1 hour ago, UNT90 said:

Hell of a 4th post. 

I'm kinda back to the RV's son theory now. 

Question is, will you want this to be an authorized life story? Shall we enter into negotiations?

If so, I have a feeling I'm going to make out like a bandit...

Hell of a 25,865th post....man that's sad. 

I think Beyond the Banner will make for great fodder at 3 am on the beIN network. 

39 minutes ago, emmitt01 said:

I only have one question. 

Do you have boxes already?  

Someday you might make detective, but not anytime soon.....don't need boxes for a place I'm not at. But to show that questions can actually be answered in a straight forward manner. No. 

[NO ONE FROM THE CURRENT AD!]

1 hour ago, UNT90 said:

Staffers who know they are gone finally able to publicly retaliate?

Let me stretch my legs... Ok, carry on...

For a guy who spent the better part of two years chasing down outlandish and shockvalue statements from RV, demanding truth and facts, suddenly I guess whenever it's made here it doesn't matter anymore. 

Once again, I simply have asked for evidence to the absurd statement that was made, without anything to back it up.

That hasn't happened and won't, so I can go ahead and dismiss that as a ridiculous lie. 

In the meantime since you and everyone thinks I'm a soon to be goner from the AD, tomorrow after I get in at 10, take a two hour, make it three hour lunch, I might call Ashton Campbell up and see about pitching a new series to replace the seemingly mothballed Beyond the Green. 

It will be called Beyond the Banner, the UNT90 life story......

  

[NO ONE FROM THE CURRENT AD!]

This is comical. I'll narrow it down, I just want one name or instance of when the Sports Information department hired a friend, buddy, son of a father. That's was the original statement.

Just one.....but guess what, it won't happen. 

[NO ONE FROM THE CURRENT AD!]

3 hours ago, Keith7 said:

I can message them to you if you'd like. I didn't want to call them out on a public forum for using their dads and buddies to get jobs. Go to the athletic website and read some of the sids bios though. See how many went to UNT.

 

Yes I'm in the media. They are very hard to work with. Especially football. Only Division 1 football program I've ever had take 3 weeks to do a phone interview.

No thanks on the messaging, I would rather see you name names....if you are gonna publicly call them out for hiring buddies, sons, friends, and such then man up and name them.

Don't hide behind the keyboard now after making the statements like they are facts. 

Bash them for everything they do wrong, that's great, but if your gonna make such accusations like nepotism and buddy buddy hires then at least have the guts to back it up. 

[NO ONE FROM THE CURRENT AD!]

1 hour ago, Keith7 said:

I think who ever comes in should find a whole new Sports Information Department. They do a horrible job of promoting events, they aren't involved in helping UNT students with internships (instead they hire sons and daughters of friends from TCU and other institutions) and they are nearly impossible to work with from a media stand point. It's time for them to be held accountable, too.

Dude come to the plate with a fact or two. Can you let me know the names of these sons and daughters and friends from TCU that they have hired? 

And I would challenge you to find some media members, real ones, not the card board box known as Brett Vito, who would say their department is hard to work with.