russell360
-
Posts
74 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Points
0 [ Donate ]
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
GoMeanGreen.com
Posts posted by russell360
-
-
You can't spell DUH without UH!
Probably not the smartest insult to lob if you are UNT fan......!
-
5
-
-
LJ agree that they have nothing in common (which is my point).
You earlier you said that UT/AM keep good "favor" with Tech football program because of Tech's medical and law "colleges", in your mind explaining why UT football would affiliate or have a special relationship with Tech. My point is that that is not a valid contention.
A&M and UT athletic programs couldn't care less about Tech's professional programs. If A&M wanted to keep Tech's football program in their "favor", and coveted Tech's med/law so much "to give kids an option" and "take strain" off their systems, why did they leave the conference?
If Tech goes to PAC or any other conference with UT it is more likely to be because the football team has 58k attendance, sells merchandise, wins bowl games and has good TV ratings rather than anything else.
Why is Tech's HSC so big? Tech's medical school in El Paso exists (and is not a part of UT) because Tech had the initiative, political support and most importantly was able to raise the money to pull it off. It wasn't given to them by UT . UT wanted it at UTEP
-
1
-
-
In 1958, the population of Texas was 9,579,677. In 2013, the estimated population of Texas was 26,448,193.
Yes, Tech has "favor" politically with UT (and aTm) somewhat because of their professional schools. Is it the only reason? I'm sure it isn't, but there is no denying that both schools need Tech to give kids options in those parts of the Southwest that would otherwise put more strain on the UT and aTm systems. aTm has already purchased TWU law school--because there is a demand for it. Tech fills a demand in their neck of the woods.
It didn't keep A&M from leaving did it?.... And Tech has a much larger HSC than A&M with 2 med schools and more students.... Do you think UNT's having a med school affects UT-UNT football?
-
1
-
-
Tech will never catch UT academically. They may reach an endowment of 1 billion this year. Texas has an endowment of over 18 billion as of 2012. Texas will out recruit TT for faculty. I am not plugging for UT, but after 45 years in higher ed., I am just stating the facts as they are.
Of course. that is why I said "start to close the gap"
-
1
-
-
nobody else in the state has stepped up to be a major player, so it goes to the barren plains..
UT is #1 in EVERYTHING and there is a big gap after them, but Tech is not small-time. Who else??
Tech averages 58k home attendance with >13k students/game
#17 school all-time number of bowl games played, won 9 of last 10
Wall street Journal ranks Tech #22 most valuable football program
# 26 rank collegiate licensing ranking
Academically; Tech/UH just received National Research university funding,and Tech and will start to close the gap with UT. Tech raises > $100 million/yr, completed a 1 billion dollar fund-raising campaign, tech system endowment should pass 1 billion this year, and has $220 million/yr research budget.. Tech will make a good target for PAC or other major conference if B12 ever dissolves
What other state school in Texas is as solid overall with football/academic programs? UH ? NT? UTEP?
-
Tech has been in the same conference as UT since 1958, long before Tech had a law school or med schools. UT associates with Tech because of Tech's professional schools? Sound s like a major stretch/rationalization. Aggies are gone. Who else would UT/Tech affiliate with?
-
Texas need more lawyers trawling around looking for work like it needs a hole in the head. What are there, maybe 25-30K lawyers already in the Metroplex? The state already adds 3,000 new lawyers each year
Couldn't UNT have spent that money more productively?
-
1
-
-
Probably a great administrator but something not right quite about getting a second degree from the Caribbean when you are already fully qualified.
Bet there is more to the story... Yikes, what message does that send the kids getting their D.O.s ...
-
bet they have the cost for UTEP wrong: $2,543 (?) pretty good deal!
-
1
-
-
Someone needs to e-mail the school and tell them that "premiere" means the first run of a show and not of high quality or first order.
Looks bad when you are tooting your own academic horn and don't know the difference...!
-
Obviously not the easiest thing to do. Tech was tired of the mature politician coach and a different direction with youth/excitement and an up-and-comer. Clearly took a big risk. The easiest would be to have hired a seasoned coordinator at a major conference or head coach from a smaller conference. Tech manned-up and threw the dice. Time will tell... Dan McCarney would have fallen all over himself to get out the door had Tech offered!
-
1
-
1
-
-
Word is that they read GL2Gs posts
-
3
-
-
UNTs research numbers and endowment lag behind the other tier one candidates. Rearranging names sure is a lot easier than raising hundreds of millions of dollars and attracting well-funded researchers, which was the intended purpose of the NRUF. If it is only about trying to qualify for NRUF without making any real improvements, that does seem to be kinda chicken@#$%.
What would the combined research $ and endowment be?
-
2
-
-
Ad hominem attack: Attacking an opponent's character rather than answering his argument....
-
2
-
-
Texas Tech was approved years ago for a vet school, but it has yet to be built. It was never funded.
-
I have to think that there HAS to be more pressing needs for the state than more law schools.
There is no true shortage of lawyers holding back the State of Texas.
This seems to boil down to NT prestige.. If UT, UH, TTU have schools, NT has to have one!... I don't think opening another school is the best stewardship of state money.
You can't tell me that there is a shortage of such magnitude that it would justify such on expense in this economy and in the face of higher ed. cuts.
The State has voiced what it wants; research universities, however,UNT is lagging behind in meeting those criteria forfunding which the state is offering, and it seems is focused on spending $$ and political capital on a law school( which is not needed). I bet that the state won't fund it.
-
2
-
-
how is each school doing in the "tier one" competion?
-
+1
Hard to say UH and Tech had a "head start" when North Texas was established in 1890, Tech 1923 and UH 1927.
-
one of the criteria is $400 million endowment:
-UH/Tech meet this
-UTD $226m
-UTA $61m
-UNT $88
-UTEP $151m
-UTSA $60m
(wikipedia...)
-
sponsor said that they sold just enough tickets to break even and make the $1.1 million payout...
Better bowl than UT's!
-
Tech draws well in Lubbock and away and alsohas a pretty good TV draw.
Of course Tech doesn't draw as well as UT but certainly is light years ahead of Baylor. Note there is no BU-UT or BU-OU games listed. Tech has a bigger fan base in the DFW area and I would suspect they have higher viewer ratings for that area.
-
1
-
-
Tech does get pretty good TV ratings
http://blogs.chron.com/sportsmedia/2010/06/some_college_football_ratings.html
-
1
-
-
He says he will "air it out". No one would be dumb enough to change Tech's great offense.
http://www.redraiders.com/2010/01/10/tuber...-to-air-it-out/
-
I would have prefered to see TCU go, but the TCU of the 80-early nighties is not the TCU we see today. BU certainly had clout, but they also had a stronger program overall( Attendance...) TCU was a sad-sck that didn't get it's act together until it was left behind. TCU had a 0.37 winning % between 1980-1994 and more importantly had poor attendance. There would be a lot more clamor that it was unfair if a weaker TCU had been taken over BU.
I find it hard to believe that the B8 was "forced " to take anyone. They were in position of control and they ultimately decided (not BU Tech UT or A&M..) who would join. All the big leagues were going to 12 members.
DRC - 18.7% Reduction In UNT Athletics Budget
in Mean Green Football
Posted
UTD and UTA don't even have football teams. Their success has little to do with sports. I don't see how lack of football has kept them from building respectable endowments academic success
Tech got to where they are because "SOLELY" athletics? All those Cotton bowl victories? BCS bowls? Fired best coach, hired a dud. During that time raised system endowment to over $1 billion, had a $1 billion dollar fund raising campaign, gained NRUF and Texas research initiative funding...
Athletics are important, but they are not the driving force behind most universities