Jump to content

Did Nixon and Shorter Make the Right Decision?


Recommended Posts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it was for money and higher competition, yes. If it was about post-football life and athletic legacy, no. IF they get on the field and make it to the next level, it will be worth it to them. If they don't, they'll hit the real world like any other athlete... maybe with less support from either alumni base. 

  • Upvote 4
  • Eye Roll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My guess is it was an obvious decision.

Play football at an at least perceived much higher level with my guess a lot more compensation.

NIL is going to ruin what's left of college football, there is simply no way a AAC or CUSA team is going to be able to keep their best players from teams with more financial support 

  • Upvote 2
  • Oh Boy! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, GrandGreen said:

My guess is it was an obvious decision.

Play football at an at least perceived much higher level with my guess a lot more compensation.

NIL is going to ruin what's left of college football, there is simply no way a AAC or CUSA team is going to be able to keep their best players from teams with more financial support 

When a player can transfer to a school and receive a 100K paycheck in addition to free school and monthly stipend, it is better than 99% of the athletes would receive in their first job out of school. In my opinion, playing time may not the first priority for many of these transfer players with only one season left, especially G5 starters moving up. For the COVID extra year players at P5 schools with a strong NIL program, some are not on the 85 scholarship roles anyway. I personally know players following this path. NIL allows them to expand the roster so to speak through payments directly to the player to pay for expenses. Without a strong NIL program, schools are limited and at a tremendous disadvantage. 

Edited by Okiefan
  • Upvote 2
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the short term, yes, they made the right choice. They will have an opportunity to play for one of the more successful programs in the SEC. They will almost certainly earn more NIL/extra money than they would have at UNT. But, playing at Auburn offer them no extra access to the NFL. And, they will find it harder to see the field among a larger group of talented players. In 10 years, most Auburn fans will probably not even remember their names. 

So in the long term... they probably made very poor choices. At UNT they would have been featured stars with every opportunity to make big time plays for the NFL scouts. And however their professional careers played out, they would have been remembered as UNT greats. In Shorter's case, possibly one of the best to ever play his position at UNT. Playing their entire careers at UNT worked out fine for Joe Greene and Abner Haynes. But, Shorter and Nixon made their choices. Now they have to live with their choice. No player(s) is/are bigger than the program. UNT will be just fine. Go Mean Green!!!

Edited by Side.Show.Joe
  • Upvote 3
  • Ray 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/24/2023 at 7:02 PM, MeanGreen13 said:

If it was for money and higher competition, yes. If it was about post-football life and athletic legacy, no. IF they get on the field and make it to the next level, it will be worth it to them. If they don't, they'll hit the real world like any other athlete... maybe with less support from either alumni base. 

Very grounded logical assessment.  Too bad it got an eye roll reaction. 

  • Upvote 1
  • Eye Roll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, untphd said:

Far as I can tell he hasn't found a spot yet.

Yea I don’t think he has. I wonder if in his mind he gained anything from going to Vandy besides just a new experience.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Cr1028 said:

Yea I don’t think he has. I wonder if in his mind he gained anything from going to Vandy besides just a new experience.

It would be one way to test the waters, bujt it has a high price.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/24/2023 at 3:54 PM, Wag Tag said:

Yes. They believe that each  of them can compete at the highest level of college football. This NIL raise also doesn’t hurt. Wish Shorter the best!

In addition they can get more "exposure" off the field as well. Just say CHEEZE!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Tell a friend

    Love GoMeanGreen.com? Tell a friend!
  • What's going on Mean Green?

    1. 45

      Temple game to be on ESPNU 10/14 @ 11 a.m.

    2. 13

      Tyler Perry called best shooter in America

    3. 31

      North Texas vs Navy (10/06/2023) Score Predictions

    4. 12

      Breaking: SOC DB Kerry Williams commits to North Texas

    5. 7

      Game Day Experience (Week 4)

  • Popular Contributors

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      15,268
    • Most Online
      1,865

    Newest Member
    3_n_out
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Posts

    • This is really cool considering that we're located in a significant zone and it will be happening during the game. To your question, I don't recall any major sports activity experiencing a > 80% eclipse.  I'm sure it's happened, but probably pretty rare. Note: This is the last annular solar eclipse that will be visible from the United States until June 21, 2039. Here's an animation of the affects/times for the entire Earth. https://science.nasa.gov/eclipses/future-eclipses/eclipse-2023/
    • The practice facility wasn't an issue getting Perry to NT.   Obviously it attracted you to NT also...
    • The odds line has went from Navy -5 to -6 points for our game. Navy hosted USF last weekend.  Navy controlled the clock 31 min to 29 min (expected with a running offense).  Navy rushed 48 times for 254 yds.  USF 44 times for only 135 yards.  However, Navy only passed 11 times for 90 yards, compared to USF passing 34 times for 338 yards.  In summary Navy had 59 plays to USF's 78 plays.  USF won 44-30. Navy will get their yards rushing, but we have to get a lot more passing!
    • Last 2 games against inferior schools (Dallas Adamson  & Dallas Spruce), Kerry had a 75 yard pick 6 (Adamson) and a 77 yard pick 6 against Spruce. Their overall secondary got off to a shaky start of the season but is improving. 
    • I had a great time as I usually do.  Some great observations made in this thread.  I drive right at 2 hours to the games, so I got a head start on the drive home and didn’t stay for the drone show.  I wanted to, but I knew I could be about halfway home by the time it ended.  Glad to hear it was worth staying for though.  Next time I might choose to stay. Minor complaint:  Why can’t the NE scoreboard show more scores?  It kept showing the same 9 scores over and over.  I’ve noticed in the past they don’t show a lot of scores, but never realized it was so few.  I don’t want scores constantly running, but maybe during a timeout run through 20-30 different games. 
  • Images

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.