Jump to content

Attendance For UNT LA Tech: 16,590


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, UNT Texas Hooligan said:

I know people are saying student turnout was bad because it was a pain to get their tickets, but I’ll say once again, fan apathy is real. Fans know they will beat losing teams and don’t buy the hype of “they’ve turned things around”. I called this before the season when Littrell wasn’t fired. We’ve seen this show before. Lose to UTSA and you’ll be lucky to see over 10K in the stadium 

We could get beat by a combined 100 points against utsa and western and I’d bet my salary homecoming would get more than 10k. Even in the crappiest years people come for homecoming. On the other hand if we came back 5-0 in conference be ready for 28k

  • Upvote 3
  • Haha 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, TheColonyEagle said:

I wonder if we’ll get a lecture about doing our part from the AD to fix that pathetic attendance….I wonder what else all of us can do to help attendance. That’s the real question….it’s not Wren’s fault. 
 

We can speculate on records and what it will take all we want…..but Wren Baker’s football program has gone stale. He’s one of the highest paid ADs in the nation. He needs to fix it 

It’s just more and more obvious that he’s stuck between a BMD and a budgetary problem. The old rock and a hard place. When you don’t have the funds or the donors, you gotta stick with what you got.

  • Upvote 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Eye Roll 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, GRN-WHT said:

TCU’s student section was packed playing at the same time. 
 

The problem is bad football. 

TCU is ranked and were playing another ranked team for first place. At a place that is expected to win or they will fire you…they fired the guy with a statue in front of their stadium because he was slipping.

We have nothing like that. Our coach looks out everyday at the practice fields named after a coach who got eventually got fired with a 42-64 record. Our students are basically told that football isn’t important here. And they’ve been told that for decades. 

  • Upvote 3
  • Thanks 1
  • Downvote 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, TheColonyEagle said:

I wonder if we’ll get a lecture about doing our part from the AD to fix that pathetic attendance

I don't think this plays well today, anywhere.  Between a self-righteous generation of students who loathe authority would be "offended" and perceive it as "being told what to do," hell, might even be the catalyst for a protest lol, it's a temperamental generation.  To the folks who will say, "we were there for the SMU game, call me when you've got a real football team on the field" - anything along the lines of "please show up" from the AD I think backfires and has the opposite result.

And it probably should, this isn't a time to look outward for an answer on attendance but inward and the message from low attendance is: "it's not worth showing up for."  

WB can't pass the buck on this one, but I for one and encouraged by the fact that I think he knows this and is taking the lumps now, taking accountability, and knows it's his job to make a move that fixes and it's an internal/personnel move.  

I think he "gets it" from that stand point, so any message on attendance in the from of "show up" would reflect poorly on him and expose the fact that he doesn't think the DEPT has a problem to solve but that YOU the fans have a problem; I respect accountability and I think he's an accountable leader from that standpoint. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1% of students basically showed up for the game. We're saying that only 1% of our students are actually fans?  That's pathetic. And don't come at me with how bad we are and how bad we've been. Actual fans show up regardless. It's equal parts not caring about sports, not having school spirit and the team not being good. The students have sucked since I started going to school here in the early 2000s.  Even when we're good they can't fill their side which is probably less than 10k.  If there was a problem getting tickets then it should be fixed by Wren, but if they wanted to go I'm sure they could have got tickets.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, untphd said:

Oh wait, never mind, we don't do things like that anymore.

Its not sustainable because of the litter! 🤡

'"Among the activities which will not be returning this year is the Homecoming Parade, a decision Jackson attributed to declining student participation, as well as the amount of litter produced not aligning with university sustainability policy."

  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 1
  • Sad 1
  • Oh Boy! 1
  • Pissed 1
  • Puking Eagle 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RBP79 said:

Yea...there was less in attendance for LaTech than FAU. What few students who showed up migrated to the west side fairly quickly to escape the sun.

Thanks to LaTech...they brought some fans

They cannot go lower because they check tickets so idk where they went. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Pavlovs Eagle said:

Its not sustainable because of the litter! 🤡

'"Among the activities which will not be returning this year is the Homecoming Parade, a decision Jackson attributed to declining student participation, as well as the amount of litter produced not aligning with university sustainability policy."

What about the university sustainability policy on attendance?

north lake park didn't want to cut the grass so they put up signs saying they were helping the butterfly pop.

Six months later they started cutting the grass again. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, UNTcrazy727 said:

It shouldn’t matter, but I don’t think playing in the middle of the day is helping us. This game should have kicked off at 6 pm. Guarantee the student turnout would have been better. 
 

I believe you are correct; tailgating is always better, and attendance does seems to be better in the evening. I know many alumni who have kiddo activities on Saturdays. Late games they will make but early games they will skip. Students in the sun on a hot day cant help either. Games should not start before 5 until mid November.  

  • Upvote 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Tell a friend

    Love GoMeanGreen.com? Tell a friend!
  • What's going on Mean Green?

    1. 20

      Early Prediction - Will we hold Navy to less than 500 yards offense?

    2. 20

      Early Prediction - Will we hold Navy to less than 500 yards offense?

    3. 8

      After 4 games, how do we feel about Coach Morris?

    4. 1

      Week 4 Observations

    5. 19

      Why does the DFW media act like SMU belongs in a Power Conference?

  • Popular Contributors

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      15,267
    • Most Online
      1,865

    Newest Member
    3_n_out
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • 3_n_out earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • 3_n_out earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • JRS192017 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • JRS192017 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • JRS192017 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Posts

    • I think we will see a different defense this week. The triple option will force more guys in the box. If we decide to not tackle, it's going to be a long game.  Right now, we run a mix of 3 and 4 man fronts. The triple option will force the defense to hold their gaps and key on certain players. The DTs/LBs will need to wrap up the FB every play. The DEs and OLBs will need to be responsible for the pitchman. Our Safety will need to come down and hit the RBs as soon as they receive the pitch. Here is a good article about defending the triple option. https://www.bloggersodear.com/2017/10/20/16508088/georgia-tech-wake-forest-paul-johnson-spread-offense-understanding-and-defending-the-triple-option
    • I think SL did the very smart thing by hiring PB. He was a proven commodity, very experienced. It was just too little too late at the time
    • For the first time in over 20 years, the university does not have an office dedicated to diversity equity and inclusion. The university’s Division of Inclusion, Diversity, Equity and AccessView Full Article
    • There are some improvements. Rogers is a real bright spot. Offense as a whole looks like it has the potential to develop into a consistently dangerous unit. My issue is that I haven’t been particularly worried about the offensive side of the ball going back to the Morris hire.  It’s the defense that will end up breaking this season for us. Simply put, we don’t have the personnel for this 3-3-5. Richards - our best defensive player - is almost completely neutralized in this alignment. When we’ve gone to 4 man, we look more competent. Not amazing, but better. Then we inexplicably switch back to 3 man in obvious running situations and get gashed. Even by FCS ACU. We’re simply being hard headed in philosophy on that side of the ball. To the team’s detriment. Either we adjust base alignment or expect AAC play to be a brutal slog for us.
    • Let me just add to the comment about Landon Sides. I believe that there was a post about his signing with North Texas a few months ago. After listing all of the things that he did on the field, UNTLIFER beat me to the punch by saying that he sounds like a certain former player Michael Lawrence....something that  I immediately agreed with. After observing him last night, I think Mr. Sides is at a slightly higher level.  I remember going to a fall practice with FFR back in 2010. One of the new players out there was a receiver that I had never heard of but by the end of practice I was very impressed. It was Breland Chancellor. FFR struck up a conversation with the young coach in charge of WR's and special teams, and toward the end of the conversation I asked about Chancellor. The coach acknowledged that he was a talented player, but they would probably redshirt him. I just smiled at the coach and said "Coach, I don't see how you are going to keep him off the field this year....he's too talented".  I am going to repeat that assessment for this young man.  They used him to great advantage last night. If I were in charge, the next thing I would do is put him out there returning punts. 
  • Images

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.