Jump to content

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, meangreenfaninno said:

He or whoever runs the account made a mistake, clearly.  That said, it is a new collective and probably not a lot of admin support etc. so let's not go overboard.  I just don't see it as a hanging offense.

 

Vice president / director of accounts?

  • Upvote 4
  • RV 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MeanGreenTexan said:

I believe the people you're angry with are the very people who are contributing 95+% of the NIL funding.

There still seems to be a lot of confusion around NIL collectives.   None of them, not a single one, are an actual University-sanctioned organization. 

They are all, every single one, independent organizations that are not under any kind of direction from the University they represent.

So when the completely independent organizations decide on leadership, they choose the person they like.   Wren Baker & Neal Smatresk have zero say.

Exactly, we are biting hands that feed us on this thread.  These people may not be doing things the way you like (tweets are embarrassing) but they’re putting effort and money in.  If you’d rather things be done differently, start your own group and make your own contributions. 

  • Upvote 5
  • RV 1
  • Sad 1
  • Oh Boy! 1
  • Eye Roll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, MeanGreenMan09 said:

This NIL Collective Political SuperPAC will dry up, because no one will trust it's leadership, why would they when this is what they are putting out.  Maybe when I'm richer, and UNT adds baseball,  I'll start my own NIL Collective, with black jack and hookers, the way it should be. 

Can’t wait!  Until then though, people giving our larger donors grief is counterproductive.  Can you imagine being so invested and relied upon while so many potential donors toil and gripe?  

  • Upvote 3
  • RV 1
  • Puking Eagle 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, MeanGreenMan09 said:

This NIL Collective Political SuperPAC will dry up, because no one will trust it's leadership, why would they when this is what they are putting out.  

Who do you think RV is reaching out to, and how many people do you think share our lack of trust in RV?

  • Upvote 3
  • Thanks 1
  • RV 2
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, greenminer said:

Who do you think RV is reaching out to, and how many people do you think share our lack of trust in RV?

Any that are paying attention I'd say... once again, just look at what is being put out in the name of the collective on Twitter, that does not say sound judgement or good PR skills... at all...

  • Upvote 4
  • Thanks 1
  • RV 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, MeanGreenTexan said:

I believe the people you're angry with are the very people who are contributing 95+% of the NIL funding.

There still seems to be a lot of confusion around NIL collectives.   None of them, not a single one, are an actual University-sanctioned organization. 

They are all, every single one, independent organizations that are not under any kind of direction from the University they represent.

So when the completely independent organizations decide on leadership, they choose the person they like.   Wren Baker & Neal Smatresk have zero say.

This is not what Vito's original report said. 

"We decided after we visited with the athletic department that we needed to get this going," Lovelace said. "We needed someone to manage it. The Athletic Department recommended Rick Villarreal because of his history, knowledge and camaraderie with UNT athletes over the years."

 

 

  • Upvote 4
  • Lovely Take 2
  • RV 1
  • Oh Boy! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

While it's true that these collectives are and must be separate entities from the University and Athletics Departments they support, they don't have carte-blanche to behave how they want to without consequence.

Once WB and Smastresk catch wind of the tweets, self-serving/promoting concert photo, and the shoddy execution of initial letter to prospective donors with many typos, RV won't be the most welcomed guest in the near future.

He will be kept at arms length and monitored closely from now on which may be for his own good if it is his desire see this collective through.

A statement from the University denouncing the collective or people involved with it, even expressing disappointment would be a huge blow to a collective.

A letter of admonishment will probably be drafted (and should be IMO) as a precursor and sent to RV and the collective board by WB/Smastresk.  While not publicly posted or distributed, it would be a matter of public record via FOIA and general records requests as required of the collective.

It would also serve to put the collective on notice that any future failings in the area of PR could lead to an official/public  reprimanding of the collective, and/or denouncing its association with UNT Athletics and UNT student-athletes (A potential proverbial "death penalty" to collectives).

While the NIL Collectives are still in their infancy stage, managing public relations on either side, the collective or a University, is of the upmost importance.  The University wields more power in this area, and has a lot of options at its disposal to rid itself of individuals it deems are undermining or harming the Universities efforts.

RV seemingly needs UNT and UNT has already made it spectacularly clear, it does not need RV.

  • Upvote 5
  • Thanks 1
  • Ray 1
  • Puking Eagle 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, meanrob said:

This is not what Vito's original report said. 

"We decided after we visited with the athletic department that we needed to get this going," Lovelace said. "We needed someone to manage it. The Athletic Department recommended Rick Villarreal because of his history, knowledge and camaraderie with UNT athletes over the years."

 

 

Oh, yikes.

  • Upvote 3
  • RV 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MeanGreenMan09 said:

Any that are paying attention I'd say... once again, just look at what is being put out in the name of the collective on Twitter, that does not say sound judgement or good PR skills... at all...

I think you overestimate how much the casual fan/UNT grad is looking at RV.  Also, we are now 4+ years into the Wren administration.  Thats 4+ generations of graduates who never knew him.

I am with everyone when it comes to loathing RV, but I also feel that our GMG.com community is small and we look at things with a much thicker magnifying glass than anyone else.

  • Upvote 4
  • RV 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, greenminer said:

I am with everyone when it comes to loathing RV, but I also feel that our GMG.com community is small and we look at things with a much thicker magnifying glass than anyone else.

The actual numbers of total posters may be small but I think you vastly underestimate how many read this site and never post.  I'd wager it is like 90%.   I have several friends who on on here daily and have been for years but never actual post.  They are just lurkers. 

Edited by cousin oliver
  • Upvote 3
  • Thanks 1
  • RV 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MeanGreenMan09 said:

Seriously, whoever thought it was a good idea to bring Rick back in and put him in charge of something important, like the NIL, should probably also be let go. Let's clean house until we get the results we want. UNT athletics shouldn't be the Rick Villareal retirement fund so he can go watch Garth Brooks for free, and act like he was raising money for our student athletes, gtfoh with that... would love to see if we achieved anything with that night out on the funds checkbook. 

 

I held my tongue when it was announced because I thought maybe it would bring in some $$, but it's a weird situation. Imagine a workplace where the old manager was fired, you were made manager, but the old manager still hung around and then was given a position that raised money for your company. 

 

 

  • Upvote 3
  • Thanks 2
  • RV 1
  • Oh Boy! 1
  • Eye Roll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, cousin oliver said:

The actual numbers of total posters may be small but I think you vastly underestimate how many read this site and never post.  I'd wager it is like 90%.   I have several friends who on on here daily and have been for years but never actual post.  They are just lurkers. 

Seriously skeptical that these non-posters make a vast, influential army of anti-RV sentiment.  But maybe?

  • Upvote 5
  • RV 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, greenminer said:

Seriously skeptical that these non-posters make a vast, influential army of anti-RV sentiment.  But maybe?

Agree - most could care less about RV and don't even know what NIL is.  You are right about that.  I am just saying there are more lurkers than posters on here in my opinion.

  • Upvote 4
  • RV 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, cousin oliver said:

I am just saying there are more lurkers than posters on here in my opinion.

I lurked for a few years! 

I would check in every couple of months to see what the "word on the street" is so-to-speak.  Finally, I had some thoughts I wanted feedback on and made a post about it and got a ton of feedback from all directions, some views I wasn't expecting, but have enjoyed the candor and conversing with other Mean Green faithful.

I have friends who have been lurkers for a while and see posts before I do and text me.

They're passionate, have strong feelings on things, some donate, some attend a lot of events, but they just don't feel like they want to contribute the way those of us that type out posts do.

Definitely a greater than 2:1, lurker:poster ratio in my estimation as well.  All things considered, the percentage of opinions/view points shared on here probable equates the same in the lurker crowd.

This board has a very diverse representation of Mean Green Fans/Supporters/Alumni (however one decides to identify, haters too) in my opinion; it has a lot of value in that regard!

  • Upvote 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Pseudo Nym said:

If that was an official UNT team or department account, and someone wrote that (the politics and going after people) they would be fired.  Absolutely be fired, there would be no discussion.

That's what the consequences would be and ironically RV, with his previous experience as an AD and athletics administrator knows this.

Also, the idea that admin support would be required to avoid mistakes like this is uninformed.  We're no longer in the first decade of social media, there was no "hacking" or "mistaking for a personal account" this was/is piss-poor management and judgement.

 

My brother in Christ, this was clearly the work of Anonymous or an equally sophisticated entity. Also, since the political tweets were all before 8/1 and the account continued tweeting normally with contact info and athlete congrats into September, we’re dealing with something that can not only hack into the mainframe, but change the flow of time itself.

 

Edited by Quoner
TIME HACKERS!
  • Upvote 2
  • Haha 7
  • Confused 1
  • Downvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I promised I would stay off the Board unless it was informational and this is. Our original Twitter site was hacked a while back and apparently whoever did it made it impossible for me to get back in or shut it down! I know there were political barbs flying back and forth and I promise you that none of that content was produced or condoned by any member of the LTTC and never would be. Anyone that really knows me or the members of our Board realizes that this type of behavior is against our general respect for people. Our goal as a Collective is to create opportunities for student-athetes and build a Collective that will help retain and attract top athletes so how would those messages advance that effort? We are still working with Twitter to  remove the messaging and hope it will happen soon.

My question is why do some of you take this misinformation, totally unsubstantiated and beat the drum one more time? Just because you don't like me. if that's the case then there is nothing I can or want to do about it.  But how do you think that breeds anything positive about this collective and its' importance?   

As long as I have started, I am going to address some other things in this thread. I know many of you will not like it and probably create more threads to demean the comments, but in all honesty it won't bother me because I know the information to be true. 

First I took this position not because I love the University, but more because I believe in young people and want the best of them to come to North Texas. I believe in the men who asked me to take the challenge on because together we built nearly every facility our student-athletes play in today. I did it because, despite your beliefs, I knew I was capable of making this happen becasue everywhere I have been in my life I have done so. And while I don't count you in that number, there are a lot of people, coaches and administrators who do believe in me and I am doing it for them. And I do love this University.

Secondly, I did raise money while I was here...lots of money. We convinced Ron Warranch to donate the entire amount, right at $1.5 million to build our tennis facility shortly after I arrived and we never stopped. Check the list of people who are our largest donors and you will see that they were brought on board during our tenure. Families giving million and multimillion dollar gifts to help build the Athletic Center, buy and renovate the Liberty Christain property and eventually erect Apogee Stadium. That cultivation has fueled their continued participation. The naysayers will try to say someone else did all this but if that's so then why didn't they do it before we got here.

As far as my ability to lead, in under 60 days, we incorporated an organization, went through the appliaction process for tax exempt status, built a new website from scratch, created banking relationships, put together a strong board, traversed through the many steps required to run an NIL, created a business platform, initiated a successful kickoff event, developed programs and partnerships to provide student-athletes with opportunities to earn compensation, created and then offered contracts and raised a significant amount of money to meet those obligations. Many schools took 8-10 monts to do the same thing. Not bad for someone that, according to you, can't run an organization effectively. And when we get that $300,000 donor we will have no problem holding a press conference.

Finally, I am not going to quit because you think I should. Many people don't feel the same way and are helping us grow. So now go and take all the shots you want, make remarks about syntax and perpetuate myths for your own benefit. What I would humbly ask is that you lose the personal grudges and think about the future of the program because it's not about me or you. It is about North Texas. 

So back to passing on information. Since the Twitter account was compromised, we have created a new Twitter site - The Real Light The Tower Collective@LLTCED2022 and will begin posting regularly soon with student-athletes providing a lot of the content about the process but also the nonprofits and charities we will be working with. I hope you will check it out and also hope you will consider joining our group to help complete the already fast start we have had. You can go to our website www.lightthetowercollective.com to get more information or make an online donation because every dollar really does help. One hundred $100 donations adds $10,000 to the fund and 200 at $500 gets us an additional $100,000. Those kinds of dollars paired with an already impressive balance from higher level gifts will help us create a solid and strong Collective so important to our athletic program.  If you would like to talk about a recurring gift, please fill out the Contact Us section on the site and I will get right back to you.

In closing, we don't have to agree, we just need to make a difference.

Let's Light The Tower and Go Mean Green!

P.s. By the way, we had the box for that Garth Brooks concert "donated" by a gentleman who comitted $40,000 and two others who committed a combined $30,000.   

Edited by Glad To Be Green
  • Upvote 4
  • Lovely Take 1
  • Thanks 2
  • Haha 2
  • RV 3
  • Skeptical Eagle 2
  • Eye Roll 2
  • Downvote 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.