Jump to content

“Nobody Did Anything About it” or Did They?: NCAA Releases New NIL Guidelines Targeting University-Affiliated NIL Collectives


Recommended Posts

The NCAA Responds with New NIL Guidance

With concerns mounting, in February of this year the NCAA’s Division I Board of Directors requested that the NCAA’s Division I Council Working Group (the “Working Group”) review the effects of NIL on student-athletes, and to clarify existing NCAA rules that university and university-collective relationships may be violating.

On May 9, 2022, the NCAA Division I Council Working Group issued Guidance Regarding Third Party Involvement to address compliance for universities with affiliated NIL Collectives. Specifically, the guidance states in bold lettering that many newly formed entities benefitting student-athletes under the guise of NIL — in other words, NIL Collectives — are subject to the NCAA’s rules regarding boosters:

It appears that the overall mission of many, if not all, of the above-referenced third party entities is to promote and support a specific NCAA institution by making available NIL opportunities to prospective student-athletes (PSA) and student-athletes (SAs) of a particular institution, thereby triggering the definition of a booster.

The guidance goes on to outline a few notable prohibitions that could be triggered by current arrangements between boosters (i.e., NIL Collectives) and potential student-athletes:

  • Boosters may not have conversations (g., text, call) “for a recruiting purpose” with potential student-athletes, or those closely associated with the athlete;
  • NIL arrangements may not be contingent or guaranteed based on enrollment at a particular school;
  • University coaches and/or staff may not facilitate meetings between potential student-athletes and boosters or communicate with potential student-athletes on behalf of a booster; and
  • NIL agreements must be based on a case-by-case analysis of the value a student-athlete brings compared to compensation or incentives for enrollment decisions, athletic performance or achievement, or membership on a specific team.

Next, the guidance reiterates that similar requirements exist for current student-athletes, specifically noting that continued enrollment at a particular institution cannot be conditioned on a NIL arrangement.

Finally, the guidance provides a non-exhaustive list of still-applicable NCAA legislative rules corresponding to provisions invoked by these relationships between NIL Collectives and student-athletes:

  • Prohibition on university representation of student-athlete athletic ability or reputation;4
  • Public comment on potential student-athlete limited to university’s recruitment of the individual;5
  • Boosters may not recruit, defined as “any solicitation of a PSA or a PSA’s family members by an institutional staff member or by a booster for the purpose of securing the PSA’s enrollment …” on behalf of a school;6
  • Boosters may not provide financial aid or incentives to potential student-athletes unless such benefit is “the same benefit [ ] generally available to the institution’s prospective students”;7
  • Pay-for-play is still prohibited;8
  • Universities are responsible for impermissible recruiting activities engaged in “by a representative of athletics interest.”9

Taken together, the NCAA’s new guidance conveys a three-part message. First, NIL Collectives, as many currently operate, must play by the same rules that traditionally applied to boosters, Second, many current NIL arrangements may run afoul of the NCAA’s Bylaws. And third, colleges and universities can still be held responsible for the actions of NIL Collectives taken on their behalf. What is less clear, however, is whether — and how — the NCAA will enforce its Bylaws against member institutions.

Read more:  https://www.velaw.com/insights/nobody-did-anything-about-it-or-did-they-ncaa-releases-new-nil-guidelines-targeting-university-affiliated-nil-collectives/

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I heard a little bit of Patterson talking on theTicket today regarding NIL, etc.

He said everyone is "surprised" at the effects of NIL and that nobody saw any of the problems related to it (i.e. people paying players, etc.).  He's either a liar or an idiot.

  • Upvote 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, meaniegreenie said:

I heard a little bit of Patterson talking on theTicket today regarding NIL, etc.

He said everyone is "surprised" at the effects of NIL and that nobody saw any of the problems related to it (i.e. people paying players, etc.).  He's either a liar or an idiot.

100% Correct. Everyone always talks about how wise the Coaches and Administrators are, but if they didn't see this coming (like almost every "fan" did) they are idiots. So Coaches, and Administrators, step up and admit your an idiot, or confess your a liar.

Edited by El Paso Eagle
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

only reason NCAA doing anything now is because Saban and Bama are whining that the playing field amongest the elites just got leveled a little more. NCAA is just a clown show on level with the CUSA leadership Clown Show

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, untbowler said:

only reason NCAA doing anything now is because Saban and Bama are whining that the playing field amongest the elites just got leveled a little more. NCAA is just a clown show on level with the CUSA leadership Clown Show

Overall, I don't see any way NIL levels the playing field.  I suppose it means excellence becomes less important to recruits than dollars.  So, some programs might suck and still pull in some good recruits.  But that doesn't make the field any more level for programs that don't have as many outside dollars ready to pour into their players (read North Texas).  This means the rich get richer and the poor get poorer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Mean Green 93-98 said:

Overall, I don't see any way NIL levels the playing field.  I suppose it means excellence becomes less important to recruits than dollars.  So, some programs might suck and still pull in some good recruits.  But that doesn't make the field any more level for programs that don't have as many outside dollars ready to pour into their players (read North Texas).  This means the rich get richer and the poor get poorer.

which is why I said amongest the elites, Bama got used to getting everyone and not the NIL opened up more teams to get players, NIL won't anything for most teams below the P5's, it is just comical though that NCAA is looking into only because the elites are having their little cat fights and Nick Saban is upset

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.