Jump to content

The New American


Side.Show.Joe

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, southsideguy said:

instating counting teams I just took WS off for football.  Do we have a breakdown of the divisions?

That depends if Navy wants to remain in the western division. Temple would certainly prefer for them to be east members, and now they've adding another Carolina school and a Miami area school to that division.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ChristopherRyanWilkes said:

I doubt the Big 12 expands any more. One AD already said 14 doesn’t make sense financially or for travel. They are past the obvious teams for expansion now, Memphis and Boise have way more issues than the group headed to Big 12. 

Academics is a big issue. I know I know most people say who cares but people do care about this hahaha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MGNation92 said:

Navy stays in the west because its better recruiting for them. They get more cadets from the area. It doesn't make sense geographically, but for school recruiting purposes you have a lot more southerners/Texans signing up than you would in the east

I would rather not play Navy every year🤣🤣

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, ADLER said:

 Interesting post off the Pony board

 

 

Laughing my ass off at the comments. They hate being in a conference with us. Really hope the next football hire is a homerun and we start dominating them in football and basketball. 

  • Upvote 3
  • Haha 2
  • Skeptical Eagle 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, keith said:

This is difficult to say, but entrance into the AAC would be the perfect time to rebrand ourselves (sports programs) as UNT leaving behind the stigma (real or perceived) of North Texas.  While we know, love and revere our North Texas moniker and history, outside of our bubble it carries a negative connotation.  It's painful to admit, but doing so is part of the healing process.  It's re-birth time and we need to leave the past behind as we forge ahead into a hopeful future.  

Hmmm, seems like I've heard that before. Seems like his initials were HF.  I know what he tried to do to change NT's "negative connotations/losing image" (one of them is still a popular logo). So tell me what your "re-birth" would look like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, UNT Texas Hooligan said:

Laughing my ass off at the comments. They hate being in a conference with us. Really hope the next football hire is a homerun and we start dominating them in football and basketball. 

SMU has at best a delusional fan base.  A team that relies heavily on away fan attendance and is only relevant because of apparently an unending supply of money and a very tattered history. 

A few SMU fans think the new alignment is a good thing, but most believe the end is near.  They want a new conference, but who is going to take them that is any better than the AAC?

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GrandGreen said:

SMU has at best a delusional fan base.  A team that relies heavily on away fan attendance and is only relevant because of apparently an unending supply of money and a very tattered history. 

A few SMU fans think the new alignment is a good thing, but most believe the end is near.  They want a new conference, but who is going to take them that is any better than the AAC?

Exactly. Being in a conference with us will only double their attendance seeing as we fill their stadium every away game, anyway.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, keith said:

This is difficult to say, but entrance into the AAC would be the perfect time to rebrand ourselves (sports programs) as UNT leaving behind the stigma (real or perceived) of North Texas.  While we know, love and revere our North Texas moniker and history, outside of our bubble it carries a negative connotation.  It's painful to admit, but doing so is part of the healing process.  It's re-birth time and we need to leave the past behind as we forge ahead into a hopeful future.  

You are worried about NT's sports image when they are joining a league with SMU in it. 

You cannot change the past, but the future can quickly change an image. 

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SilverEagle said:

Hmmm, seems like I've heard that before. Seems like his initials were HF.  I know what he tried to do to change NT's "negative connotations/losing image" (one of them is still a popular logo). So tell me what your "re-birth" would look like.

Not sure what it would look like, but as silly as it sounds it could be like a fresh start in the minds of the average Joe sports fan (if that matters).  Evidence suggests it's better to have little to no history as opposed to a negative history.  It's why you have fans of other conferences say that have no problem with UTSA or Texas St (they probably have no clue as to their Southwest Texas State University history) as conference mates, but throw up in their mouths a little at the mention of North Texas.  I know it hurts to hear, but it's the reality.  We've changed the name of our school, what, seven times?  Yeah, yeah, I know....and it's always had North in it.  So 'effing what?  We're going to stubbornly hang our collective futures on one word?  Thirty+ years later and those that should know better still refer to us as North Texas State or NTSU (not counting those who do it on purpose).  We're like an addict that refused to admit we have a problem.  

Like it or not we still suffer from the directional school image.  Central Florida and South Florida got away from it (in the sports world anyway) by presenting themselves as UCF and USF respectively.  It's time for us to do the same.

  • Upvote 2
  • Eye Roll 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, keith said:

Not sure what it would look like, but as silly as it sounds it could be like a fresh start in the minds of the average Joe sports fan (if that matters).  Evidence suggests it's better to have little to no history as opposed to a negative history.  It's why you have fans of other conferences say that have no problem with UTSA or Texas St (they probably have no clue as to their Southwest Texas State University history) as conference mates, but throw up in their mouths a little at the mention of North Texas.  I know it hurts to hear, but it's the reality.  We've changed the name of our school, what, seven times?  Yeah, yeah, I know....and it's always had North in it.  So 'effing what?  We're going to stubbornly hang our collective futures on one word?  Thirty+ years later and those that should know better still refer to us as North Texas State or NTSU (not counting those who do it on purpose).  We're like an addict that refused to admit we have a problem.  

Like it or not we still suffer from the directional school image.  Central Florida and South Florida got away from it (in the sports world anyway) by presenting themselves as UCF and USF respectively.  It's time for us to do the same.

Never forget being at Legacy West (shopping area) with my UNT cap on after the Arkansas game. The platitudes were off the hook. I had mentioned I was at the game and have to give a group of guys a play by play. Winning solves a lot of image issues.

  • Upvote 5
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, keith said:

Not sure what it would look like, but as silly as it sounds it could be like a fresh start in the minds of the average Joe sports fan (if that matters).  Evidence suggests it's better to have little to no history as opposed to a negative history.  It's why you have fans of other conferences say that have no problem with UTSA or Texas St (they probably have no clue as to their Southwest Texas State University history) as conference mates, but throw up in their mouths a little at the mention of North Texas.  I know it hurts to hear, but it's the reality.  We've changed the name of our school, what, seven times?  Yeah, yeah, I know....and it's always had North in it.  So 'effing what?  We're going to stubbornly hang our collective futures on one word?  Thirty+ years later and those that should know better still refer to us as North Texas State or NTSU (not counting those who do it on purpose).  We're like an addict that refused to admit we have a problem.  

Like it or not we still suffer from the directional school image.  Central Florida and South Florida got away from it (in the sports world anyway) by presenting themselves as UCF and USF respectively.  It's time for us to do the same.

Never heard of UNT

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, GBarksdale said:

I think we suffer more from losing.  Fix that and nobody will care whether we're North Texas or UNT.

I think other directional schools having found success (UCF, USF) have helped shake the negativity towards this. Boise State, Fresno State, Coastal Carolina aren't exactly sexy land grant names either.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, GBarksdale said:

I think we suffer more from losing.  Fix that and nobody will care whether we're North Texas or UNT.

Yes we do and consistent winning will obviously help.  If we continue to be a perennial loser it won't matter how we refer to ourselves.  I just feel that on the new stage it will a shorter path for UNT than for North Texas, that's all.  These inflection points don't come around very often, I'm suggesting we take a look in the mirror and ask if there is anything else we can do and this would be easy.

Let me share a story.  I used to work for a large well-known, multi-brand hospitality chain with locations in 100 countries.  Our largest brand represented over 50% of our properties but was beginning to suffer image-wise domestically and lag behind some of our "fresher" brands.  What did we do to turn the brand around?  We took the top 20% of the properties and rebranded them as <brand name> Grand. We didn't change signage at the properties, we didn't change service at the properties, we didn't redesign or refurbish the properties (they were already in good shape), we didn't retrain thousands of associates, we didn't change anything about the properties or amenities at the properties.  We didn't do anything other than change the name of the properties on our web site by appending the word "Grand" to the brand name of the hotel.  A simple, one-time content change to the web site.  That was it.   

The result?  We were able to generate a 30% increase in the rate per room night at our "Grand" properties and improve guest loyalty and satisfaction across the entire brand.  Perception is reality and we changed the perception with a "project" that cost about $100 to implement.

  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.