Jump to content

UAB 2/8/20


CMJ

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, greenminer said:

We've gone 1-7 against T100 RPI teams, the one win being ARK-Little Rock.

not sure about NET opponents, and whether @97and03 was referring to that or RPI.

Ahhh. Makes sense.

Does the NCAA Tournament selection committee rely more heavily on RPI or NET for at large selections and tournament seedlings?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, 97and03 said:

That we are 1-7 versus the top 100. Not a strong resume. 

We have by far the strongest resume in CUSA. Here is the data line in order. The reality is the entire league has 1 Q1 win (La Tech at Miss St). We've played by far the most Q1+Q2 games and have the most Q1+Q2 wins. We played 9. ODU had 8. No one else had more than 7. We have the best Q2 record in the league. To put in perspective, the Big 12 has 3 teams with winning Q1 records in Baylor (9-0), Kansas(10-3) and West Virginia(5-3). After that, they don't fare much better Oklahoma (3-7), Texas Tech (3-7), Texas (2-8). Interestingly enough, if we moved up from 89 to 75 in Net Score, we'd be a Q1 win for Oklahoma.  

 Team                                                  Net     Opp                   overall         conf   noncon road   SOS  noncon    Q1    Q2     Q3         Q4  

                                                                         Net                                                                                          SOS

[]  Charlotte

165

200

225

14-9

 

8-4

6-5

2-8

312

341

0-0

0-3

5-3

9-3

[]  FIU

166

204

238

14-8

 

8-4

6-4

5-6

273

337

0-3

0-1

3-2

11-2

[]  Fla. Atlantic

198

192

204

11-11

 

6-6

5-5

2-8

271

339

0-1

0-3

3-4

8-3

[]  Louisiana Tech

98

203

232

15-7

 

8-4

7-3

6-6

298

276

1-2

0-1

3-4

11-0

[]  Marshall

181

167

132

11-13

 

6-6

5-7

3-7

132

109

0-3

1-2

3-7

7-1

[]  Middle Tenn.

289

156

113

3-19

 

2-10

1-9

2-8

121

47

0-1

0-2

1-14

2-2

[]  North Texas

89

159

118

14-9

 

10-2

4-7

6-5

116

27

0-5

2-2

3-1

9-1

[]  Old Dominion

160

168

134

10-15

 

6-6

4-9

2-8

153

127

0-3

1-4

0-5

9-3

[]  Rice

218

180

166

10-13

 

4-8

6-5

4-7

144

85

0-2

0-4

4-1

6-6

[]  Southern Miss.

278

137

82

4-18

 

3-9

1-9

1-10

109

19

0-5

0-2

2-8

2-3

[]  UAB

209

188

185

12-11

 

5-7

7-4

4-5

194

238

0-2

1-1

4-5

7-3

[]  UTEP

190

171

142

10-12

 

4-8

6-4

1-9

142

18

0-1

0-3

5-7

5-1

[]  UTSA

196

173

147

8-14

 

5-7

3-7

3-7

190

144

0-2

1-2

3-6

4-4

[]  Western Ky.

121

172

143

15-8

 

9-3

6-5

3-5

110

23

0-2

1-1

5-5

9-0

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, meangreenJW said:

We have by far the strongest resume in CUSA. Here is the data line in order. The reality is the entire league has 1 Q1 win (La Tech at Miss St). We've played by far the most Q1+Q2 games and have the most Q1+Q2 wins. We played 9. ODU had 8. No one else had more than 7. We have the best Q2 record in the league. To put in perspective, the Big 12 has 3 teams with winning Q1 records in Baylor (9-0), Kansas(10-3) and West Virginia(5-3). After that, they don't fare much better Oklahoma (3-7), Texas Tech (3-7), Texas (2-8). Interestingly enough, if we moved up from 89 to 75 in Net Score, we'd be a Q1 win for Oklahoma.  

 Team                                                  Net     Opp                   overall         conf   noncon road   SOS  noncon    Q1    Q2     Q3         Q4  

                                                                         Net                                                                                          SOS

[]  Charlotte

165

200

225

14-9

 

8-4

6-5

2-8

312

341

0-0

0-3

5-3

9-3

[]  FIU

166

204

238

14-8

 

8-4

6-4

5-6

273

337

0-3

0-1

3-2

11-2

[]  Fla. Atlantic

198

192

204

11-11

 

6-6

5-5

2-8

271

339

0-1

0-3

3-4

8-3

[]  Louisiana Tech

98

203

232

15-7

 

8-4

7-3

6-6

298

276

1-2

0-1

3-4

11-0

[]  Marshall

181

167

132

11-13

 

6-6

5-7

3-7

132

109

0-3

1-2

3-7

7-1

[]  Middle Tenn.

289

156

113

3-19

 

2-10

1-9

2-8

121

47

0-1

0-2

1-14

2-2

[]  North Texas

89

159

118

14-9

 

10-2

4-7

6-5

116

27

0-5

2-2

3-1

9-1

[]  Old Dominion

160

168

134

10-15

 

6-6

4-9

2-8

153

127

0-3

1-4

0-5

9-3

[]  Rice

218

180

166

10-13

 

4-8

6-5

4-7

144

85

0-2

0-4

4-1

6-6

[]  Southern Miss.

278

137

82

4-18

 

3-9

1-9

1-10

109

19

0-5

0-2

2-8

2-3

[]  UAB

209

188

185

12-11

 

5-7

7-4

4-5

194

238

0-2

1-1

4-5

7-3

[]  UTEP

190

171

142

10-12

 

4-8

6-4

1-9

142

18

0-1

0-3

5-7

5-1

[]  UTSA

196

173

147

8-14

 

5-7

3-7

3-7

190

144

0-2

1-2

3-6

4-4

[]  Western Ky.

121

172

143

15-8

 

9-3

6-5

3-5

110

23

0-2

1-1

5-5

9-0

And overall, we have played a projected 6 tournament teams in OOC. Lost by a total of 14 to 3 of them in VCU, OU and USU

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Tell a friend

    Love GoMeanGreen.com? Tell a friend!
  • What's going on Mean Green?

    1. 39

      Best BBQ in each Texas college football town

    2. 19

      Will we see changes coming from inside UNT?

    3. 19

      Will we see changes coming from inside UNT?

    4. 19

      Will we see changes coming from inside UNT?

    5. 1

      Green Room Podcast - Player Rankings

  • Popular Contributors

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      15,383
    • Most Online
      1,865

    Newest Member
    KeithSHU
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.