DRC: Muhammad denies he spit on ODU WR Duhart

[Brett Vito]

DRC:

https://www.dentonrc.com/sports/muhammad-i-will-never-spit-on-another-player/article_d9051e04-46d8-5e85-ae73-acc73a9e032d.html

[UNT 90 Grad]

@BeyondTheGreen, what say you?   Did you see anything orally fired in your footage?

[Withers940]

I dont buy this for a second! He's not the type of player that does this type of thing. I've never seen him lose his cool before

[TheReal_jayD]

1 minute ago, Withers940 said:

I dont buy this for a second! He's not the type of player that does this type of thing. I've never seen him lose his cool before

100% agree!! I dont think for a second Muhammad did it. Now he might have got spit on by another player. but it wasnt Muhammad.

[untcampbell]

Sat next to a player's mom on the way home from Norfolk. Her son told her that if anything happened, "spittle" may have flown during some jawing back and forth (not that the son had any particular knowledge), as in when someone yells loudly and stuff flies from the mouth of he who is yelling. Spitting, to me, infers no words are flying and that there is a pre-calculated gathering of saliva that is forcefully expelled in targeted fashion with intent to strike the victim.

But the source's point was that the ref wasn't in any position to see anything. Essentially the ref just took Duhart's word for it.

 

GMG

Edited November 12, 2018 by untcampbell
Punctuation

[Withers940]

1 minute ago, untcampbell said:

Sat next to a player's mom on the way home from Norfolk. Her son told her that if anything happened, "spittle" may have flown during some jawing back and forth (not that the son had any particular knowledge), as in when someone yells loudly and stuff flies from the mouth of he who is yelling. Spitting, to me, infers no words are flying and that there is a pre-calculated gathering of saliva that is forcefully expelled in targeted fashion with intent to strike the victim.

But the source's point was that the ref wasn't in any position to see anything. Essentially the ref just took Duhart's word for it.

 

GMG

Another sign that CUSA ref's belong referring a Wednesday Night Mens Flag football game and not College level.

 

You dont take a players word for it. If you didnt see it, it didnt happen. No video evidence to look back on then you cant eject someone for hearsay  

[meaniegreenie]

2 hours ago, untcampbell said:

Sat next to a player's mom on the way home from Norfolk. Her son told her that if anything happened, "spittle" may have flown during some jawing back and forth (not that the son had any particular knowledge), as in when someone yells loudly and stuff flies from the mouth of he who is yelling. Spitting, to me, infers no words are flying and that there is a pre-calculated gathering of saliva that is forcefully expelled in targeted fashion with intent to strike the victim.

But the source's point was that the ref wasn't in any position to see anything. Essentially the ref just took Duhart's word for it.

 

GMG

Isn't this what the announcers were saying as to what SL seemed to be telling the refs?

[UNTexas]

Did he throw a fit, get a second 15 yard personal foul, gift them 3 points, totally shift the momentum, and we subsequently lost by 3?

That might need to be addressed. If he were truly operating at the high level he claims then he would have showed an ounce of discipline. 

Edited November 12, 2018 by UNTexas

[UNTLifer]

40 minutes ago, UNTexas said:

Did he throw a fit, get a second 15 yard personal foul, gift them 3 points, totally shift the momentum, and we subsequently lost by 3?

That might need to be addressed. If he were truly operating at the high level he claims then he would have showed an ounce of discipline. 

He threw a fit defending himself and accidentally bumped in to the official.  It was a b.s. call, he took the bait (which I would have at that age), argued with the ref, bumped him and got tossed.  I would like to see Baker and Littrell take this to the league office.

[peanuts104]

19 minutes ago, UNTLifer said:

I would like to see Baker and Littrell take this to the league office.

I at least want more of an explanation.  But I wish all CUSA schools would take the absolutely horrendous officiating that has happened all this AND last season to the league office.  

[greenminer]

1 hour ago, UNTexas said:

Did he throw a fit, get a second 15 yard personal foul, gift them 3 points, totally shift the momentum, and we subsequently lost by 3?

No one is talking about that. Not a single post prior to this one was about why we lost the game.

[Stan R]

First thing I though of was this conspiracy: 

[GrandGreen]

1 hour ago, greenminer said:

No one is talking about that. Not a single post prior to this one was about why we lost the game.

Maybe because this thread is not about losing the game. 

[UNTLifer]

5 hours ago, Stan R said:

First thing I though of was this conspiracy: 

And we have a winner. 

[UNTexas]

7 hours ago, UNTLifer said:

He threw a fit defending himself and accidentally bumped in to the official.  It was a b.s. call, he took the bait (which I would have at that age), argued with the ref, bumped him and got tossed.  I would like to see Baker and Littrell take this to the league office.

I played for UNT at his age. I never once in 4 years saw a player throw a fit and make physical contact with a referee that resulted in a penalty. He knows better. He screwed up massively and hurt his team. Pretty pathetic from my perspective. The coaches have probably dealt with his behavior and they won't publicly discuss it. Every player knows how to behave and he has to be accountable. 

[meaniegreenie]

1 hour ago, UNTLifer said:

And we have a winner. 

Possibly a "second spitter"???

 

[Censored by Laurie]

2 hours ago, meaniegreenie said:

Possibly a "second spitter"???

 

only funny thing Seinfeld has ever produced. 

 

[Censored by Laurie]

3 hours ago, UNTLifer said:

And we have a winner. 

shouldn't we be indignant about the mocking of the murder of a president? 

[UNTLifer]

2 minutes ago, Censored by Laurie said:

shouldn't we be indignant about the mocking of the murder of a president? 

Yep, especially since it happened so recently.  My bad. 

[Censored by Laurie]

10 minutes ago, UNTLifer said:

Yep, especially since it happened so recently.  My bad. 

so the significance of life lessens in proportion to the time that's passed since their murder?

so Kennedy, OK...Whitman, almost certainly...Susan Smith should be funny by now...where are we with 9/11?

[UNT 90 Grad]

4 hours ago, Censored by Laurie said:

shouldn't we be indignant about the mocking of the murder of a president? 

I think it is pretty clear they are mocking the investigation into JFK’s assassination, not the murder itself.  

[Cerebus]

9 hours ago, Censored by Laurie said:

shouldn't we be indignant about the mocking of the murder of a president? 

Stop being purposefully obtuse.

 

(You harridan.)

[Censored by Laurie]

1 minute ago, Cerebus said:

Stop being purposefully obtuse.

does it stand out significantly from the ignorant obtusities?

[Cerebus]

2 minutes ago, Censored by Laurie said:

does it stand out significantly from the ignorant obtusities?

A truth that's told with bad intent beats all the lies you can invent.
 

[Censored by Laurie]

25 minutes ago, Cerebus said:

A truth that's told with bad intent beats all the lies you can invent.
 

no bird soars too high if he soars with his own wings