Jump to content

Distancing ourselves from Army rivalry is still a head scratcher to me...


Recommended Posts

What ever your views on leaving the Army series, I find it amusing that we are knocking Liberty for not being a recognizable name team.  LIberty fans are probably saying the same thing..'get us an opponent with name recognition.'  As to a religious element in scheduling Liberty, I think you are reading far too much into the AD's motives.  It's a done deal and now we just need to hope (and pray?) that we don't get beat by Liberty.

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 2
  • Downvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, MeanGreenTexan said:

Actually, we do know, because it has been specifically said, multiple times by Littrell & Baker.   

Littrell & his staff did not like the Army matchup because it was hard on his team.  It took them out of their rhythm, because each season, for a full week, they had to put the breaks on normal practices & practice for triple option... then you have that blocking scheme & dirty play getting our guys hurt...  He wanted out of the series.    Wren delivered with a VERY WINNABLE replacement.   Some people don't like it because of Liberty's religious alignment.   Who cares?  It's a football game!

That's it.  End of story.

I will reaffirm that Littrell and staff wanted out of the series as the practice changes plus the travel were very disruptive. Anyone remember how flat we looked after the Army game against UTSA in 2016? I do.

  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, drex said:

What ever your views on leaving the Army series, I find it amusing that we are knocking Liberty for not being a recognizable name team.  LIberty fans are probably saying the same thing..'get us an opponent with name recognition.'  As to a religious element in scheduling Liberty, I think you are reading far too much into the AD's motives.  It's a done deal and now we just need to hope (and pray?) that we don't get beat by Liberty.

Just take a gander here:
http://www.espn.com/college-football/team/schedule/_/id/2335/year/2017

If we're a serious team, which I believe we are, do you think Liberty is a team that's going to beat us?

We essentially have 2 FCS games this season. This game will count as an FBS game since Liberty is in transition... but they're still very much on the FCS level talent/ability-wise.

Wins, wins, wins... doesn't matter who/where we get them from... just win games.    Hello Boise model!

 

PS.  I know what some of you are thinking...
We are a LOOOOOOOONG way away from Portland State.  Do not bring up Portland State.

  • Upvote 4
  • Thanks 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Politics and religion aside...Liberty is a winnable game, but they do not have the same name recognition nationally as Army does, that’s obvious. The most intriguing thing to me about Liberty is the amount of money they are spending on athletics. Their facilities are pretty damn good. They may be a power down the line so maybe it’s a good thing North Texas plays them while they are still building everything up. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, UNTFan23 said:

I will reaffirm that Littrell and staff wanted out of the series as the practice changes plus the travel were very disruptive. Anyone remember how flat we looked after the Army game against UTSA in 2016? I do.

It didn't help that UTSA was mega hyped for their Super Bowl game in the world's largest KFC, either...

  • Upvote 1
  • Lovely Take 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, UNTFan23 said:

I will reaffirm that Littrell and staff wanted out of the series as the practice changes plus the travel were very disruptive. Anyone remember how flat we looked after the Army game against UTSA in 2016? I do.

Fair enough but I see no reason why there should be any issue getting up for sack in ANY situation.  They are the closest thing to a rival this program has ever had sans SMU.  To quote @SilverEagle that is a “culture” or mindset issue that has to be addressed if it indeed exists.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Harry said:

Fair enough but I see no reason why there should be any issue getting up for sack in ANY situation.  They are the closest thing to a rival this program has ever had sans SMU.  To quote @SilverEagle that is a “culture” or mindset issue that has to be addressed if it indeed exists.

If we are going to keep our program developing we need a RIVALRY. One that gets the attention of both the students and the alumni......and interested people in the community.

GreyEagle can best address what our mindset was when we were in our last rivalry relationship with East Texas Texas State (A&M Commerce) back in the 40's. I don't know if we hated/disliked one another intensely , but there was a lot of back-and-forth and prank-playing going on between the two schools. 

At this point I couldn't clearly identify who I dislike most, ......SMU or UTSA. To me, UTSA is more of our true rival. And only because SMU is just not interested,.....and it takes two to tango.  However, UTSA definitely wants to tango. 

Having said that, I believe that establishing a rivalry with La Tech would be to our benefit. This one might not be as intense, but it could develop into a big game between two well respected programs that look forward to the game every year. In other words, a friendly rivalry.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SilverEagle said:

If we are going to keep our program developing we need a RIVALRY. One that gets the attention of both the students and the alumni......and interested people in the community.

GreyEagle can best address what our mindset was when we were in our last rivalry relationship with East Texas Texas State (A&M Commerce) back in the 40's. I don't know if we hated/disliked one another intensely , but there was a lot of back-and-forth and prank-playing going on between the two schools. 

At this point I couldn't clearly identify who I dislike most, ......SMU or UTSA. To me, UTSA is more of our true rival. And only because SMU is just not interested,.....and it takes two to tango.  However, UTSA definitely wants to tango. 

Having said that, I believe that establishing a rivalry with La Tech would be to our benefit. This one might not be as intense, but it could develop into a big game between two well respected programs that look forward to the game every year. In other words, a friendly rivalry.

raw

  • Lovely Take 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/9/2018 at 2:34 PM, letsgiveacheer said:

But we should not despair, great restaurants abound in Lynchburg. I hear McDonalds has a new cooked to order quarter pounder that I can't wait to try!

 

So you're saying its not worth the $450 + 2 hotel nights to fly there for the football game?  I would get to mark LYH off my airports I've flown to list...

On travel games I expect to win, I think I may go to El Paso for that game vs Lynchburg.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Pavlovs Eagle said:

So you're saying its not worth the $450 + 2 hotel nights to fly there for the football game?  I would get to mark LYH off my airports I've flown to list...

On travel games I expect to win, I think I may go to El Paso for that game vs Lynchburg.

Joking aside, Lynchburg is a nice looking town on the James River. History buffs in particular will enjoy coming to both Virginia games. Near Lynchburg are Appomattox,  Lexington,  the D-Day Memorial and more.

But I have to agree, the airfare to LYH is killer. You might as well go to Paris for that kind of money!

Edited by letsgiveacheer
  • Lovely Take 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/10/2018 at 11:04 AM, Salsa_Verde said:

Politics and religion aside...Liberty is a winnable game, but they do not have the same name recognition nationally as Army does, that’s obvious. The most intriguing thing to me about Liberty is the amount of money they are spending on athletics. Their facilities are pretty damn good. They may be a power down the line so maybe it’s a good thing North Texas plays them while they are still building everything up. 

And they're sponsoring Hendricks Motorsport's #24 Chevrolet,....which wiped out with about 12 laps to Go in NASCAR's K.C. Masterpiece 400 in Kansas last night.

IMG_5880.PNG.1dc45f8ff1931788eb190fdf9fea4143.PNG

 

Rick

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate that my university is associating in any way, shape, or form with Liberty.  Schedule TCU, BYU, or SMU all you want.  Those schools are religious but they're not embracing and advancing pseudoscience.  

  • Upvote 2
  • Lovely Take 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Confused 1
  • Downvote 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know I’m in the minority but I would like to see Army rejoin C-USA. I think it would add more prestige to the conference. I don’t think Army has any interest in doing so but who knows after the next round of realignment. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, southsideguy said:

They preseason report on Liberty is concerning,  They can pass and last year we could not cover the pass.

The preseason report on Austin Westlake must also be concerning?   Coach Dodge really has those guys winging it all over the field.

 

EDIT:  Sarcastic Point being: Liberty, like Austin Westlake, is on a different level than us.  Their vaunted passing attack may frighten FCS schools (obviously not too much if St. Francis (PA)... who went 5-6 last season... holds Liberty to 7pts), but should be no problem for an FBS school.

Edited by MeanGreenTexan
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, MeanGreenTexan said:

The preseason report on Austin Westlake must also be concerning?   Coach Dodge really has those guys winging it all over the field.

 

EDIT:  Sarcastic Point being: Liberty, like Austin Westlake, is on a different level than us.  Their vaunted passing attack may frighten FCS schools (obviously not too much if St. Francis (PA)... who went 5-6 last season... holds Liberty to 7pts), but should be no problem for an FBS school.

I dunno, man.  Westlake has a "football plan." 

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are there schools we could 1-1 with that may help down the road on realignment? What about some MWC schools, UNM, CSU, SDST. AAC what about Tulsa, Tulane or Memphis?. Playing schools in these conferences on a regular basis may help down the road!

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MeanGreenTexan said:

The preseason report on Austin Westlake must also be concerning?   Coach Dodge really has those guys winging it all over the field.

 

EDIT:  Sarcastic Point being: Liberty, like Austin Westlake, is on a different level than us.  Their vaunted passing attack may frighten FCS schools (obviously not too much if St. Francis (PA)... who went 5-6 last season... holds Liberty to 7pts), but should be no problem for an FBS school.

Well the issue all year(FCS/FBS/DII didn't make a difference) was that Reffett's defense puts corners on an island more often than not and our blitzes weren't getting home.

If we can rush the passer more effectively our pass defense will improve significantly. When you give the QB 10 seconds in the pocket, no corner is going to be able to sustain coverage for that long.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/10/2018 at 8:32 AM, UNTFan23 said:

I will reaffirm that Littrell and staff wanted out of the series as the practice changes plus the travel were very disruptive. Anyone remember how flat we looked after the Army game against UTSA in 2016? I do.

That is so sad. I  threw up a little in my mouth. 

Are you employed by the school to tow the company line? Or just in line to brown nose?

Seriously though. There is no excuse not to be up for UTSA period end of story! Hello!

For those that don't have selective company memories, this team has a track record of being flat after a really meaningful win. New York is not really much further to travel than South Florida. New York at least is not as hot and the area is gorgeous. Plenty of teams travel further. Now we have to build schedules based on style of play seems like a slippery slope, who knows what style of play a team might employ a few years down the line. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.