Jump to content

CUSA is terrible this year


BillySee58

Recommended Posts

The original CUSA had Louisville, Marquette, DePaul, Cincy, South Florida, Memphis, Charlotte, UAB, USM, Tulane, and Houston. That was a great collection of traditional basketball powers. Then the old Big East poached away Louisville, Marquette, DePaul, and Cincy, replacing them with SMU, UTEP, Marshall, Rice, Tulsa, ECU, and UCF. Certainly a drop down in hoops power, but Memphis was still kicking ass in the Calipari years. But then the AAC takes away UCF, USF, UH, Tulsa, Tulane, Memphis, and ECU.

Schools like UAB, WKU and UTEP, as well as improving programs like ODU, La Tech and MUTS, and programs that are down now but used to be good like Charlotte and USM, have to look at us, UTSA, Rice, Marshall, FAU, and FIU, and just cry at what we are doing to their RPI and the conference's RPI.

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, BillySee58 said:

 

I'd have to think this is well on pace to be the worst year ever for CUSA, RPI wise. Right, @TheTastyGreek?

Yes, and it isn't even going to be close. Last year was the worst, with CUSA 17th in the conference rankings. This year we're at 21, with few OOC wins that could boost us, and a lot of terrible losses that will likely keep us where we are, if not drop us behind the Ohio Valley Conference by the end of the year. 

For reference, the Sun Belt is, according to RPI, a superior conference to CUSA this year. They currently have 3 teams (out of 11) above .500 against D1 opponents. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, TheTastyGreek said:

Yes, and it isn't even going to be close. Last year was the worst, with CUSA 17th in the conference rankings. This year we're at 21, with few OOC wins that could boost us, and a lot of terrible losses that will likely keep us where we are, if not drop us behind the Ohio Valley Conference by the end of the year. 

For reference, the Sun Belt is, according to RPI, a superior conference to CUSA this year. They currently have 3 teams (out of 11) above .500 against D1 opponents. 

Good stuff, as always. Thank you

Edited by BillySee58
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
On January 13, 2016 at 5:55 PM, TheTastyGreek said:

Yes, and it isn't even going to be close. Last year was the worst, with CUSA 17th in the conference rankings. This year we're at 21, with few OOC wins that could boost us, and a lot of terrible losses that will likely keep us where we are, if not drop us behind the Ohio Valley Conference by the end of the year. 

For reference, the Sun Belt is, according to RPI, a superior conference to CUSA this year. They currently have 3 teams (out of 11) above .500 against D1 opponents. 

One of the most annoying excuses we kept hearing, from both Dickenson on air and from RV, is that this is just a harder league than the Sun Belt we became so accustomed to having success in. As Tasty pointed out, heading into conference play this was by far the worst season RPI-wise in CUSA history. Probably finished around the same. Not sure what Sun Belt conference RPI rank was in 2011-2012 (last season under Jones).

And to top it off, we get knocked off by a former Sun Belt team and the conference winner is a former Sun Belt team. Both of which made the jump from Sun Belt to CUSA the same year as us. 

  • Upvote 5
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BillySee58 said:

One of the most annoying excuses we kept hearing, from both Dickenson on air and from RV, is that this is just a harder league than the Sun Belt we became so accustomed to having success in. As Tasty pointed out, heading into conference play this was by far the worst season RPI-wise in CUSA history. Probably finished around the same. Not sure what Sun Belt conference RPI rank was in 2011-2012 (last season under Jones).

CUSA is the 22nd ranked conference in terms of RPI this year. That's 5 slots behind the Sun Belt this season, and closer to the SWAC than the AAC in terms of raw numbers. 

CUSA 2015-16: Composite RPI of .4734
SBC 2011-12: Composite RPI of .4831

For some reason, I'm having SERIOUS problems with replying to posts today... Here are the links for 2016: http://www.realtimerpi.com/rpi_conf_Men.html and for 2012: http://www.realtimerpi.com/2011-2012/rpi_conf_Men.html

...and, for the record, IPS can eat a rooster. Not loving the board software at the moment. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TheTastyGreek said:

CUSA is the 22nd ranked conference in terms of RPI this year. That's 5 slots behind the Sun Belt this season, and closer to the SWAC than the AAC in terms of raw numbers. 

CUSA 2015-16: Composite RPI of .4734
SBC 2011-12: Composite RPI of .4831

For some reason, I'm having SERIOUS problems with replying to posts today... Here are the links for 2016: http://www.realtimerpi.com/rpi_conf_Men.html and for 2012: http://www.realtimerpi.com/2011-2012/rpi_conf_Men.html

...and, for the record, IPS can eat a rooster. Not loving the board software at the moment. 

If it's any consolation, I appreciate you. You loyal. I'd leave you a heartwarming DJ Khaled gif if I wasn't posting from mobile.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/12/2016 at 6:05 PM, BillySee58 said:

One of the most annoying excuses we kept hearing, from both Dickenson on air and from RV, is that this is just a harder league than the Sun Belt we became so accustomed to having success in. As Tasty pointed out, heading into conference play this was by far the worst season RPI-wise in CUSA history. Probably finished around the same. Not sure what Sun Belt conference RPI rank was in 2011-2012 (last season under Jones).

And to top it off, we get knocked off by a former Sun Belt team and the conference winner is a former Sun Belt team. Both of which made the jump from Sun Belt to CUSA the same year as us. 

Excuses from the AD and the people associated with. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

UAB and USM are the only charter members left, USM the only charter football member left. FIU and FAU didn't play football when CUSA was chartered. ODU, UTSA, and Charlotte didn't have football when CUSA 2.0 was created. 

Only five schools have played 10 or more seasons in CUSA. WKU is the newest member joining in 2014 and eight schools have only one more season in CUSA than WKU.

Replacing DePaul didn't turn Rice hoops into DePaul and didn't turn MTSU into Memphis.

The Southern used to have Alabama and North Carolina as members, WAC used to have Arizona, Arizona State, BYU and Utah. The Valley used to have Kansas and Nebraska.

The brand doesn't build schools. The schools build the brand.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Tell a friend

    Love GoMeanGreen.com? Tell a friend!
  • What's going on Mean Green?

    1. 0

      A few HSO's

    2. 25

      Judge orders Florida State, ACC to mediation to settle suit

    3. 25

      Judge orders Florida State, ACC to mediation to settle suit

    4. 2

      Softball Schedule Update--Weekend Games With Wichita State

  • Popular Contributors

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      15,381
    • Most Online
      1,865

    Newest Member
    KeithSHU
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.