Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'football'.



More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • Mean Green Sports
    • Mean Green Football
    • Mean Green Basketball
    • UNT Football Recruiting
    • UNT Basketball Recruiting
    • Mean Green Athletics
    • The Eagles Nest (There Should be Pie For Everyone Forum)
    • Mean Green Ticket Exchange

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


Home


Interests

Found 114 results

  1. Better late than never. Compiled via http://cfbstats.com/. Top 10 Nationally underlined. O F F E N S E D E F E N S E Scoring Offense Scoring Defense UNT - 38th nationally at 33.2 ppg UNT - 115th at 34.4 ppg Rice - T 124th nationally at 16.5 ppg Rice - 70th at 28.1 ppg Rushing Offense Rushing Defense UNT - 78th nationally at 152.70 ypg, 8 TD UNT - 100th nationally at 193.80 ypg, 27 TD Rice - 119th nationally at 116 ypg, 9 TD Rice - 57tht nationally at 148.60 ypg, 17 TD Passing Offense Passing Defense UNT - 20th nationally at 296.9 ypg, 31 TD (6th nat), 9 INT UNT - T 76th nationally at 235.5 ypg, 14 TD, 4 INT Rice - 99th nationally at 167.1 ypg, 12 TD, 3 INT (5th nat) Rice - 99th nationally at 252.4 ypg, 17 TD, 5 INT Total Offense Total Defense UNT - 29th nationally at 449.6ypg UNT - 94th nationally at 429.3 ypg Rice - 127th nationally at 283.1 ypg Rice - 68th nationally at 401.0 ypg First Downs Opp First Downs UNT - T 40th nationally at 22.4 pg UNT - T 96th nationally at 22.2 pg Rice - 122nd nationally at 16.9 pg Rice - T 48th nationally at 19.7 pg 3rd Down Conversions Opp 3rd Down Conversions UNT - 85th nationally at 38.19% UNT - T 92nd nationally at 42.38% Rice - 99th nationally at 36.30% Rice - 123rd nationally at 47.41% 4th Down Conversions Opp 4th Down Conversions UNT - 57th at 56.00% UNT - 55th at 47.37% Rice - 103rd at 41.18% Rice - T 96th at 60.00% Red Zone Scoring Conversions Opp Red Zone Scoring Conversions UNT - T 59th at 85.00% UNT - T 124th at 92.11% Rice - T 117th at 72.41% Rice - T 97th at 86.67% Sacks Allowed Sacks UNT - T 36th nationally (16), 1.6 sacks pg UNT - T 44th nationally (24), 2.4 sacks pg Rice - T 113th nationally (30), 3 sacks pg Rice - T 122nd nationally (11), 1.1 sacks pg Tackles For Loss Allowed Tackles For Loss UNT - T 78th nationally (62), 6.2 TFLs pg UNT - T 69th nationally (59), 5.9 TFLs pg Rice - T 85th nationally (64), 6.4 TFLs pg Rice - T 84th nationally (55), 5.5 TFLs pg S P E C I A L • T E A M S Punt Returns Opp Punt Returns UNT - T 59th nationally at 8.27 avg ypr, 1 TD UNT - 94th nationally at 9.92 avg ypr, 1 TD Rice - T 45th nationally at 9.00 avg ypr, 0 TD Rice - 11th nationally at 2.17 avg ypr, 0 TD Kickoff Returns Opp Kickoff Returns UNT - 32nd nationally at 23.18 avg ypr, 1 TD UNT - 117th nationally at 24.54 avg ypr, 2 TD Rice - 62nd nationally at 20.71 avg ypr, 0 TD Rice - 107th nationally at 23.06 avg ypr, 1 TD Punting / Field Positioning Opp Punting / Field Positioning UNT - 49th nationally at 42.95 avg ypp UNT - 16th nationally at 39.45 avg ypp Rice - 43rd nationally at 43.18 avg ypp Rice - 27th nationally at 40.13 avg ypp Field Goals / PAT Kicking Opp Field Goals / PAT Kicking UNT - T 41st at 80%, 1.6 made pg / Tied 69th at 97.4%, 3.8 made pg UNT - T 106th at 84.6%, 1.1 made pg / 32nd at 94.6%, 3.5 made pg Rice - T 109th at 58.3%, 0.7 made pg / T 130th at 85.17%, 1.8 made pg Rice - T 81st at 76.19%, 1.0 made pg / T 86th at 100%, 3.3 made pg T E A M • S T A T S Turnover Margin Time of Possession UNT - T 103rd nationally, -0.50 margin pg UNT - 96th nationally, 28:41.20 pg Rice - T 84th nationally, -0.30 margin pg Rice - 33rd nationally, 31:12.70 pg Penalties Opp Penalties UNT - 74th nationally, 55.9 penalty ypg UNT - 127th nationally, 36.1 penalty ypg Rice - T 1st nationally, 30.3 penalty ypg Rice - T 24th nationally, 62.5 penalty ypg MASON FINE vs WILEY GREEN Completion Percentage QB Rating Fine - 49th nationally, 62.6% Fine - 32nd nationally, 148.92 Green - N/R, 52.8% Green - N/R, 105.82 Passing Yards Rushing Yards, Touchdowns Fine - 21st nationally, 2657 yards (265.7 ypg, 21st nat) Fine - N/R, -49 yards, 1 TDs Green - N/R, 787 yards (78.7 ypg, N/R) Green - N/R -29 yards, 0 TDs Yards Per Attempt Interceptions Fine - 53rd nationally, 7.6 ypa Fine - T 99th nationally, 6 INT (0.60 INT pg) Green - N/R, 5.5 ypa Green - T 15th nationally, 2 INT (0.2 INT pg) Passing Touchdowns Total Offense Fine - T 11th nationally, 27 TDs (2.7 TD pg) Fine - 40th nationally, 260.8 ypg Green - N/R, 4 TDs (0.4 TD pg) Green - N/R, 108.3 ypg
  2. After a rough, up-and-down October both in life and on the field, I have returned to my posts of (mostly) meaningless stats. Compiled via http://cfbstats.com/. Top 10 Nationally underlined. O F F E N S E D E F E N S E Scoring Offense Scoring Defense UNT - 28th nationally at 35.0 ppg UNT - T 103rd at 32.4 ppg LaTech - T 22nd nationally at 36.4 ppg LaTech - 44th at 23.6 ppg Rushing Offense Rushing Defense UNT - 71st nationally at 161.44 ypg, 7 TD UNT - 94th nationally at 186 ypg, 22 TD LaTech - 55th nationally at 177.38 ypg, 19 TD LaTech - 51st nationally at 143.75 ypg, 13 TD Passing Offense Passing Defense UNT - 18th nationally at 300.4 ypg, 30 TD, 7 INT UNT - 72nd nationally at 230.8 ypg, 13 TD, 3 INT LaTech - 22nd nationally at 293.9 ypg, 14 TD, 7 INT LaTech - 101st nationally at 253.5 ypg, 10 TD, 9 INT Total Offense Total Defense UNT - 27th nationally at 461.9 ypg UNT - 87th nationally at 416.8 ypg LaTech - 22nd nationally at 471.3 ypg LaTech - 68th nationally at 397.3 ypg First Downs Opp First Downs UNT - T 27th nationally at 23.1 pg UNT - T 64th nationally at 20.6 pg LaTech - T 21st nationally at 23.9 pg LaTech - T 102nd nationally at 22.8 pg 3rd Down Conversions Opp 3rd Down Conversions UNT - 65th nationally at 39.85% UNT - 84th nationally at 40.44% LaTech - 47th nationally at 41.84% LaTech - 69th nationally at 38.71% 4th Down Conversions Opp 4th Down Conversions UNT - 59th at 54.17% UNT - T 57th at 47.06% LaTech - T 54th at 55.56% LaTech - T 50th at 45.45% Red Zone Scoring Conversions Opp Red Zone Scoring Conversions UNT - 45th at 87.18% UNT - T 118th at 90.63% LaTech - T 10th at 93.75% LaTech - 4th at 61.76% Sacks Allowed Sacks UNT - T 49th nationally (15), 1.67 sacks pg UNT - T 42nd nationally (21), 2.33 sacks pg LaTech - T 49th nationally (15), 1.88 sacks pg SoMiss - T 83rd nationally (16), 2.0 sacks pg Tackles For Loss Allowed Tackles For Loss UNT - T 87th nationally (56), 6.22 TFLs pg UNT - T 61st nationally (53), 5.89 TFLs pg LaTech - T 13th nationally (35), 4.38 TFLs pg LaTech - T 61st nationally (53), 6.63 TFLs pg S P E C I A L • T E A M S Punt Returns Opp Punt Returns UNT - T 56th nationally at 8.27 avg ypr, 1 TD UNT - 95th nationally at 9.92 avg ypr, 1 TD LaTech - 83rd nationally at 6.33 avg ypr, 0 TD LaTech - T 103rd nationally at 10.60 avg ypr, 0 TD Kickoff Returns Opp Kickoff Returns UNT - 20th nationally at 24.50 avg ypr, 1 TD UNT - 120th nationally at 25.54 avg ypr, 2 TD SoMiss - 49th nationally at 22.05 avg ypr, 1 TD LaTech - 72nd nationally at 20.98 avg ypr, 1 TD Punting / Field Positioning Opp Punting / Field Positioning UNT - 62nd nationally at 42.27 avg ypp UNT - 21st nationally at 39.83 avg ypp LaTech - 129th nationally at 36.65 avg ypp LaTech - 12th nationally at 39.39 avg ypp Field Goals / PAT Kicking Opp Field Goals / PAT Kicking UNT - T 31st at 83.3%, 1.7 made pg / Tied 74th at 97.3%, 4.0 made pg UNT - T 101st at 83.3%, 1.1 made pg / T 19th at 93.3%, 3.1 made pg LaTech - T 26th at 84.6%, 1.4 made pg / T 1st at 100%, 4.5 made pg LaTech - T 17th at 58.3%, 0.9 made pg / T 73rd at 100%, 3.0 made pg T E A M • S T A T S Turnover Margin Time of Possession UNT - T 88th nationally, -0.33 margin pg UNT - 76th nationally, 29:32.89 pg LaTech - T 38th nationally, 0.38 margin pg LaTech - 58th nationally, 30:18.25 pg Penalties Opp Penalties UNT - T 50th nationally, 52.0 penalty ypg UNT - 127th nationally, 34.8 penalty ypg LaTech - 26th nationally, 45.1 penalty ypg LaTech - 115th nationally, 43.3 penalty ypg MASON FINE vs J'MAR SMITH Completion Percentage QB Rating Fine - 57th nationally, 62.4% Fine - T 28th nationally, 152.03 Smith - 17th nationally, 69.4% Smith - 32nd nationally, 150.52 Passing Yards Rushing Yards, Touchdowns Fine - 7th nationally, 2609 yards (289.9 ypg, 14th nat) Fine - N/R, -43 yards, 1 TDs Smith - 22nd nationally, 2220 yards (277.5 ypg, 17th nat) Smith - N/R 182 yards, 2 TDs Yards Per Attempt Interceptions Fine - T 45th nationally, 7.8 ypa Fine - N/R, 6 INT (0.67 INT pg) Smith - 24th nationally, 8.3 ypa Smith - T 46th nationally, 3 INT (0.375 INT pg) Passing Touchdowns Total Offense Fine - T 3rd nationally, 27 TDs (3.0 TD pg) Fine - 18th nationally, 285.1 ypg Smith - T 46th nationally, 13 TDs (1.625 TD pg) Smith - 13th nationally, 300.3 ypg
  3. Another week, another post of (mostly) meaningless stats. The further we go along, the less meaningless this will become. Compiled via http://cfbstats.com/. Top 10 Nationally underlined. O F F E N S E D E F E N S E Scoring Offense Scoring Defense UNT - T 43rd nationally at 33.0 ppg UNT - T 97th at 30.4 ppg SoMiss - T 77th nationally at 27.6 ppg SoMiss - T 97th at 30.4 ppg Rushing Offense Rushing Defense UNT - 50th nationally at 182.0 ypg, 6 TD UNT - 102nd nationally at 189 ypg,11 TD SoMiss - 116th nationally at 107.6 ypg, 4 TD SoMiss - 40th nationally at 123.2 ypg, 8 TD Passing Offense Passing Defense UNT - 41st nationally at 269.4 ypg,13 TD, 3 INT UNT - 27th nationally at 189.2 ypg, 6 TD, 2 INT SoMiss - 13th nationally at 313.2 ypg, 10 TD, 4 INT SoMiss - 108th nationally at 267 ypg, 11 TD, 2 INT Total Offense Total Defense UNT - 36th nationally at 451.4 ypg UNT - 58th nationally at 378.2 ypg SoMiss - T 66th nationally at 420.8 ypg SoMiss - 66th nationally at 390.2 ypg First Downs Opp First Downs UNT - T 54th nationally at 22.0 pg UNT - 52nd nationally at 19.4 pg SoMiss - T 100th nationally at 19.0 pg SoMiss - T 47th nationally at 19.2 pg 3rd Down Conversions Opp 3rd Down Conversions UNT - 92nd nationally at 36.25% UNT - 93rd nationally at 41.03% SoMiss - 15th nationally at 48.44% SoMiss - 80th nationally at 38.33% 4th Down Conversions Opp 4th Down Conversions UNT - T 64th at 50.00% UNT - T 39th at 40.00% SoMiss - T 1st at 100.00% SoMiss - T 129th at 100% Red Zone Scoring Conversions Opp Red Zone Scoring Conversions UNT - T 12th at 95.24% UNT - T 95th at 87.50% SoMiss - 25th at 92.31% SoMiss - T 118th at 92.86% Sacks Allowed Sacks UNT - T 57th nationally (10), 2 sacks pg UNT - T 27th nationally (15), 3 sacks pg SoMiss - T 26th nationally (7), 1.4 sacks pg SoMiss - T 23rd nationally (16), 3.2 sacks pg Tackles For Loss Allowed Tackles For Loss UNT - T 91st nationally (36), 7.2 TFLs pg UNT - T 55th nationally (33), 6.6 TFLs pg HOU - T 66th nationally (31), 6.2 TFLs pg UTSA - T 48th nationally (34), 6.8 TFLs pg S P E C I A L • T E A M S Punt Returns Opp Punt Returns UNT - 46th nationally at 9.5 avg ypr, 0 TD UNT - 123rd nationally at 17.33 avg ypr, 1 TD SoMiss - 13th nationally at 15.88 avg ypr, 1 TD SoMiss - 101st nationally at 11.4 avg ypr, 0 TD Kickoff Returns Opp Kickoff Returns UNT - 39th nationally at 23 avg ypr, 1 TD UNT - 118th nationally at 26.38 avg ypr, 1 TD SoMiss - T 17th nationally at 26.27 avg ypr, 2 TD SoMiss - 105th nationally at 24.31 avg ypr, 1 TD Punting / Field Positioning Opp Punting / Field Positioning UNT - T 59th nationally at 42.32 avg ypp UNT - 93rd nationally at 42.96 avg ypp SoMiss - 112th nationally at 38.95 avg ypp SoMiss - 26th nationally at 36.98 avg ypp Field Goals / PAT Kicking Opp Field Goals / PAT Kicking UNT - T 19th at 90%, 1.8 made pg / Tied 1st at 100%, 3.6 made pg UNT - T 71st at 75%, 1.2 made pg / T 37th at 94.1%, 3.2 made pg SoMiss - T 51st at 75%, 1.2 made pg / T 1st at 100%, 2.8 made pg SoMiss - T 27th at 57.1%, 0.8 made pg / T 57th at 100%, 4.0 made pg T E A M • S T A T S Turnover Margin Time of Possession UNT - T 43rd nationally, 0.40 margin pg UNT - 40th nationally, 31:24.40 pg SoMiss - T 116th nationally, -1.00 margin pg SoMiss - 42nd nationally, 31:13.40 pg Penalties Opp Penalties UNT - T 99th nationally, 67 penalty ypg UNT - T 124th nationally, 35.4 penalty ypg SoMiss - T 86th nationally, 61.6 penalty ypg SoMiss - 116th nationally, 39.8 penalty ypg MASON FINE vs JACK ABRAHAM Completion Percentage QB Rating Fine - 57th nationally, 62.4% Fine - 69th nationally, 136.96 Abraham - T 20th nationally, 69.4% Abraham - 12th nationally, 172.89 Passing Yards Rushing Yards, Touchdowns Fine - 36th nationally, 1291 yards (258.2 ypg) Fine - N/R, -22 yards, 0 TDs Abraham - 13th nationally, 1515 yards (303 ypg) Abraham - N/R 16 yards, 2 TDs Yards Per Attempt Interceptions Fine - T 89th nationally, 6.9 ypa Fine - T 75th nationally, 3 INT (0.6 INT pg) Abraham - 7th nationally, 10.5 ypa Abraham - T 99th nationally, 4 INT (0.8 INT pg) Passing Touchdowns Total Offense Fine - T 22nd nationally, 11 TDs (2.2 TD pg) Fine - 49th nationally, 253.8 ypg King - T 46th nationally, 9 TDs (1.8 TD pg) Abraham - 13th nationally, 306.2 ypg Welcome surprise of the week: our defenses are even! Unwelcome surprise of the week: we may have another rough outing in special teams coverage and just, ugh - looking at Jack Abraham's numbers compared to Fine's.
  4. Well, now that D'Eriq King has literally taken his ball and gone home, the end of this comparison is going to be even more meaningless. Compiled via http://cfbstats.com/. Top 10 Nationally underlined. O F F E N S E D E F E N S E Scoring Offense Scoring Defense UNT - 42nd nationally at 35.0 ppg UNT - T 75th at 26.5 ppg HOU - 65th nationally at 30.8 ppg HOU - T 107th at 33.8 ppg Rushing Offense Rushing Defense UNT - 41st nationally at 203 ypg, 5 TD UNT - T 94th nationally at 177.5 ypg, 8 TD HOU - 17th nationally at 255 ypg, 9 TD UTSA - 108th nationally at 199.5 ypg, 7 TD Passing Offense Passing Defense UNT - 64th nationally at 247.3 ypg,11 TD, 3 INT UNT - T 47th nationally at 205.5 ypg, 5 TD, 2 INT HOU - 114th nationally at 167 ypg, 6 TD, 2 INT HOU - 120th nationally at 301.5 ypg, 11 TD, 2 INT Total Offense Total Defense UNT - 43rd nationally at 450.3 ypg UNT - 70th nationally at 383 ypg UTSA - 63rd nationally at 422 ypg HOU - 123rd nationally at 501.5 ypg First Downs Opp First Downs UNT - T 55th nationally at 22.5 pg UNT - 62nd nationally at 20.0 pg HOU - T 36th nationally at 23.8 pg HOU - 111th nationally at 23.5 pg 3rd Down Conversions Opp 3rd Down Conversions UNT - T 92nd nationally at 37.29% UNT - 90th nationally at 41.79% HOU - T 45th nationally at 43.40% HOU - 58th nationally at 35.42% 4th Down Conversions Opp 4th Down Conversions UNT - 82nd at 45.45% UNT - T 42nd at 40.00% HOU - T 66th at 50.00% HOU - T 99th at 66.67% Red Zone Scoring Conversions Opp Red Zone Scoring Conversions UNT - 15th at 94.74% UNT - T 68th at 83.33% HOU - T 21st at 93.33% HOU - T 83rd at 85.71% Sacks Allowed Sacks UNT - T 85th nationally (9), 2.25 sacks pg UNT - T 14th nationally (13), 3.25 sacks pg HOU - T 114th nationally (12), 4 sacks pg HOU - T 47th nationally (9), 2.25 sacks pg Tackles For Loss Allowed Tackles For Loss UNT - T 107th nationally (28), 7 TFLs pg UNT - T 23rd nationally (28), 7 TFLs pg HOU - T 100th nationally (27), 6.75 TFLs pg UTSA - T 45th nationally (24), 6 TFLs pg S P E C I A L • T E A M S Punt Returns Opp Punt Returns UNT - 55th nationally at 8.71 avg ypr UNT - 92nd nationally at 10.25 avg ypr HOU - 59th nationally at 8.25 avg ypr HOU - 86th nationally at 9.29 avg ypr Kickoff Returns Opp Kickoff Returns UNT - 44th nationally at 22.87 avg ypr, 1 TD UNT - T 77th nationally at 21.80 avg ypr, 0 TD HOU - T 108th nationally at 17.00 avg ypr, 0 TD HOU - 49th nationally at 19.50 avg ypr, 0 TD Punting / Field Positioning Opp Punting / Field Positioning UNT - 70th nationally at 41.86 avg ypp UNT - 69th nationally at 42.06 avg ypp HOU - 20th nationally at 45.81 avg ypp HOU - 14th nationally at 38.11 avg ypp Field Goals / PAT Kicking Opp Field Goals / PAT Kicking UNT - T 34th at 87.5%, 1.8 made pg / Tied 1st at 100%, 4.3 made pg UNT - T 64th at 71.4%, 1.3 made pg / T 25th at 91.7%, 2.8 made pg HOU - T 76th at 66.7%, 1.5 made pg / T 1st at 100%, 3.8 made pg HOU - T 38th at 60%, 0.8 made pg / T 43rd at 100%, 4.5 made pg T E A M • S T A T S Turnover Margin Time of Possession UNT - T 32nd nationally, 0.50 margin pg UNT - 50th nationally, 31:00:01 pg HOU - T 58th nationally, 0.00 margin pg HOU - 46th nationally, 31:12:50 pg Penalties Opp Penalties UNT - 108th nationally, 69.5 penalty ypg UNT - 119th nationally, 36.8 penalty ypg HOU - T 54th nationally, 52.5 penalty ypg HOU - 1st nationally, 101.5 penalty ypg MASON FINE vs D'ERIQ KING Completion Percentage QB Rating Fine - 73rd nationally, 61.8% Fine - 66th nationally, 140.20 King - N/R, 52.7% King - N/R, 117.72 Passing Yards Rushing Yards, Touchdowns Fine - 40th nationally, 940 yards (235.0 ypg) Fine - N/R, -20 yards, 0 TDs King - 92nd nationally, 663 yards (165.8 ypg) King - 42nd nationally, 312 yards, 6 TDs Yards Per Attempt Interceptions Fine - T 80th nationally, 7.2 ypa Fine - T 91st nationally, 3 INT (0.75 INT pg) King - N/R, 6.0 ypa King - T 46th nationally, 2 INT (0.50 INT pg) Passing Touchdowns Total Offense Fine - T 19th nationally, 9 TDs (2.25 TD pg) Fine - 75th nationally, 230.0 ypg King - T 53rd nationally, 6 TDs (1.5 TD pg) King - 62nd nationally, 243.8 ypg
  5. Took last week off on this because, you know – work, travel, and C A L I F O R N I A. But now, back to (meaningless) business. Compiled via http://cfbstats.com/. These are currently filtered by All Games, but once we get to maybe week 5 or 6, I'll adjust the filter to only reflect FBS competition. Top 10 Nationally underlined. O F F E N S E D E F E N S E Scoring Offense Scoring Defense UNT - 66th nationally at 31.7 ppg UNT - T 108th at 34.3 ppg UTSA - 106th nationally at 20.7 ppg UTSA - T 106th at 33.7 ppg Rushing Offense Rushing Defense UNT - 61st nationally at 174 ypg, 2 TD UNT - 97th nationally at 181 ypg, 8 TD UTSA - 75th nationally at 166.33 ypg, 6 TD UTSA - 124th nationally at 245.33 ypg, 9 TD Passing Offense Passing Defense UNT - 53rd nationally at 259.3 ypg, 8 TD, 3 INT UNT - 81st nationally at 231.3 ypg, 5 TD, 0 INT UTSA - T 110th nationally at 172.3 ypg, 3 TD, 3 INT UTSA - 7th nationally at 125.7 ypg, 4 TD, 1 INT Total Offense Total Defense UNT - 55th nationally at 433.3 ypg UNT - 88th nationally at 412.3 ypg UTSA - 107th nationally at 338.7 ypg UTSA - T 66th nationally at 371 ypg First Downs Opp First Downs UNT - T 66th nationally at 21.7 pg UNT - T 78th nationally at 20.7 pg UTSA - T 106th nationally at 18.3 pg UTSA - T 66th nationally at 20.3 pg 3rd Down Conversions Opp 3rd Down Conversions UNT - T 104th nationally at 33.34% UNT - T 113th nationally at 46.81% UTSA - T 45th nationally at 44.45% UTSA - 80th nationally at 39.29% 4th Down Conversions Opp 4th Down Conversions UNT - 60th at 55.56% UNT - T 90th at 66.67% UTSA - T 33rd at 75.00% UTSA - T 1st at 0% Red Zone Scoring Conversions Opp Red Zone Scoring Conversions UNT - Tied 1st at 100% UNT - T 96th at 90% UTSA - T 51st at 87.50% UTSA - T 93rd at 88.89% Sacks Allowed Sacks UNT - T 102nd nationally (9), 3 sacks pg UNT - T 18th nationally (10), 3.34 sacks pg UTSA - T 102nd nationally (9), 3 sacks pg UTSA - T 70th nationally (6), 2 sacks pg Tackles For Loss Allowed Tackles For Loss UNT - T 95th nationally (21), 7 TFLs pg UNT - T 26th nationally (22), 7.33 TFLs pg UTSA - T 95th nationally (21), 7 TFLs pg UTSA - T 65th nationally (17), 5.67 TFLs pg S P E C I A L • T E A M S Punt Returns Opp Punt Returns UNT - T 55th nationally at 8.00 avg ypr UNT - T 111th nationally at 15.00 avg ypr UTSA - 110th nationally at 3.20 avg ypr UTSA - 125th nationally at 22.25 avg ypr Kickoff Returns Opp Kickoff Returns UNT - 46th nationally at 22.87 avg ypr, 1 TD UNT - 98th nationally at 24 avg ypr, 0 TD UTSA - 27th nationally at 27.40 avg ypr, 0 TD UTSA - 67th nationally at 20.17 avg ypr, 0 TD Punting / Field Positioning Opp Punting / Field Positioning UNT - 71st nationally at 41.27 avg ypp UNT - 76th nationally at 42.67 avg ypp UTSA - 68th nationally at 41.69 avg ypp UTSA - 29th nationally at 39.67 avg ypp Field Goals / PAT Kicking Opp Field Goals / PAT Kicking UNT - T 1st at 100%, 2 made pg / T 1st at 100%, 3.7 made pg UNT - T 76th at 80%, 1.3 made pg / T 26th at 91.7%, 3.7 made pg UTSA - T 121st at 0%, 0 made pg / T 1st at 100%, 2.7 made pg UTSA - T 89th at 100%, 0.3 made pg / T 33rd at 100%, 4.7 made pg T E A M • S T A T S Turnover Margin Time of Possession UNT - T 95th nationally, -0.67 margin pg UNT - 42nd nationally, 31:25:33 pg UTSA - T 108th nationally, -1.00 margin pg UTSA - 19th nationally, 33:40:00 pg Penalties Opp Penalties UNT - 120th nationally, 80 penalty ypg UNT - T 91st nationally, 44 penalty ypg UTSA - 127th nationally, 85.7 penalty ypg UTSA - T 87th nationally, 45 penalty ypg MASON FINE vs FRANK HARRIS Completion Percentage QB Rating Fine - 82nd nationally, 60.6% Fine - 76th nationally, 135.65 Harris - T 13th nationally, 72.5% Harris - 86th nationally, 123.67 Passing Yards Rushing Yards, Touchdowns Fine - 34th nationally, 745 yards (248.3 ypg Fine - N/R, -20 yards, 0 TDs Harris - T 90th nationally, 486 yards (162 ypg) Harris - N/R, 127 yards, 0 TDs Yards Per Attempt Interceptions Fine - T 80th nationally, 6.8 ypa Fine - T 100th nationally, 3 INT (1 INT pg) Harris - N/R Harris - T 65th nationally, 2 INT (0.67 INT pg) Passing Touchdowns Total Offense Fine - T 21st nationally, 7 TDs (2.34 TD pg) Fine - T 58th nationally, 241.7 ypg Harris - T 85th nationally (last), 3 TDs (1 TD pg) Harris - T 86th nationally, 204.3 ypg
  6. As a change-up from my series last year of just out-and-out listing our top 25 statistical categories, here's a week-by-week comparison against our upcoming component. Compiled via http://cfbstats.com/. These are currently filtered by All Games, but once we get a few weeks into the season, I'll adjust the filter to only reflect FBS competition. Top 10 Nationally underlined. O F F E N S E D E F E N S E Scoring Offense Scoring Defense UNT - 13th nationally at 51 ppg UNT - Tied 88th at 31 ppg SMU - 47th nationally at 37 ppg SMU - Tied 81st at 30 ppg Rushing Offense Rushing Defense UNT - 51st nationally at 192 ypg, 1 TD UNT - 100th nationally at 183 ypg, 3 TD SMU - 76th nationally at 148 ypg, 3 TD SMU - 42nd nationally at 90 ypg, 0 TD Passing Offense Passing Defense UNT - 10th nationally at 383 ypg, 4 TD, 1 INT UNT - 97th nationally at 273 ypg, 1 TD, 0 INT SMU - 16th nationally at 360 ypg, 0 TD SMU - 110th nationally at 324 ypg, 4 TD, 1 INT Total Offense Total Defense UNT - 15th nationally at 575 ypg UNT - 102nd nationally at 456 ypg SMU - 30th nationally at 508 ypg SMU - 87th nationally at 414 ypg First Downs Opp First Downs UNT - Tied 31st nationally at 26 pg UNT - Tied 70th nationally at 20 pg SMU - Tied 16th nationally at 29 pg SMU - Tied 104th nationally at 25 pg 3rd Down Conversions Opp 3rd Down Conversions UNT - Tied 81st nationally at 38.46% UNT - Tied 115th nationally at 52.94% SMU - Tied 30th nationally at 52.94% SMU - Tied 25th nationally at 23.08% 4th Down Conversions Opp 4th Down Conversions UNT - Tied 37th at 66.67% UNT - N/R SMU - Tied 40th at 50.00% SMU - Tied 75th at 66.67% Red Zone Scoring Conversions Opp Red Zone Scoring Conversions UNT - Tied 1st at 100% UNT - Tied 65th at 100% SMU - Tied 81st at 75% SMU - Tied 81st at 75% Sacks Allowed Sacks UNT - Tied 71st nationally (2), 2 sacks pg UNT - Tied 57th nationally (2), 2 sacks pg SMU - Tied 29th nationally (1), 1 sacks pg SMU - Tied 57th nationally (2), 2 sacks pg Tackles For Loss Allowed Tackles For Loss UNT - Tied 68th nationally (6), 6 TFLs pg UNT - Tied 75th nationally (5), 5 TFLs pg SMU - Tied 48th nationally (5), 5 TFLs pg SMU - Tied 36th nationally (7), 7 TFLs pg S P E C I A L • T E A M S Punt Returns Opp Punt Returns UNT - 45th nationally at 8.33 avg ypr UNT - N/R SMU - 88th nationally at 1.00 avg ypr SMU - Tied 66th nationally at 13.00 avg ypr Kickoff Returns Opp Kickoff Returns UNT - 4th nationally at 35.67 avg ypr, 1 TD UNT - Tied 47th nationally at 18 avg ypr, 0 TD SMU - 3rd nationally at 36.50 avg ypr, 1 TD SMU - 64th nationally at 20.17 avg ypr, 0 TD Punting / Field Positioning Opp Punting / Field Positioning UNT - 106th nationally at 37.00 avg ypp UNT - Tied 67th nationally at 42.57 avg ypp SMU - 101st nationally at 37.50 avg ypp SMU - Tied 53rd nationally at 45.1 avg ypp Field Goals / PAT Kicking Opp Field Goals / PAT Kicking UNT - Tied 1st at 100%, 4 made pg / Tied 1st at 100%, 6 made pg UNT - Tied 45th at 100%, 1 made pg / Tied 11th at 100%, 4 made pg SMU - Tied 61st at 75%, 3 made pg / Tied 118th at 67%, 2 made pg SMU - N/R / Tied 118th at 67%, 2 made pg / Tied 11th at 100%, 4 made pg T E A M • S T A T S Turnover Margin Time of Possession UNT - Tied 51st nationally, 0 margin pg UNT - Tied 43rd nationally, 32:33:00 pg SMU - Tied 12th nationally, +2 margin pg SMU - 21st nationally, 35:14:00 pg Penalties Opp Penalties UNT - Tied 49th nationally, 45 penalty ypg UNT - Tied 94th nationally, 35 penalty ypg SMU - Tied 57th nationally, 50 penalty ypg SMU - 20th nationally, 83 penalty ypg MASON FINE vs SHANE BEUCHELE Completion Percentage QB Rating Fine - Tied 14th nationally, 75.7% Fine - 12th nationally, 192.90 Beuchele - 78th nationally, 61.2% Beuchele - 91st nationally, 118.85 Passing Yards Rushing Yards, Touchdowns Fine - 9th nationally, 383 yards Fine - N/R, 16 yards, 0 TDs Beuchele - 14th nationally, 360 yards Beuchele - N/R, 3 yards, 0 TDs Yards Per Attempt Interceptions Fine - 13th nationally, 10.4 ypa Fine - Tied 64th nationally, 1 INT Beuchele - Tied 58th nationally, 7.3 ypa Beuchele - Tied 64th nationally, 1 INT Passing Touchdowns Total Offense Fine - Tied 4th nationally, 4 TDs Fine - Tied 10th nationally, 399 ypg Beuchele - N/R, 0 TDs Beuchele - 15th nationally, 363 ypg
  7. ...Let The Scoring Begin! Had to share this pic I captured Saturday morning during Load & Fire Practice. Wished I had my SLR on me instead of my old phone. Rick
  8. Two North Texas-related articles on The Athletic today: The Preseason Athletic 130 60 North Texas Only opponents they have ranked ahead of us are Houston (47) and Cal (51). All others: UAB (78) SMU (81) Southern Miss (86) LaTech (90) Middle Tennessee (106) Charlotte (108) UTSA (114) UTEP (121) Rice (127) Blurb: ---- On the Bruce Feldman 40 college football assistant coaches to watch in 2019 article:
  9. https://marketscale.com/industries/sports-and-entertainment/wren-baker What does it take to build a consistent winning program? That’s the question being asked on a daily basis by everyone from athletic directors, to coaches, to business owners. Everyone wants to win, but few possess the ability to draw up the blueprint to make it happen. Since his arrival in Denton, Texas in July 2016, Wren Baker, Vice President and Director of Athletics at the University of North Texas, has built a program that has ascended out of the doldrums of the NCAA and onto the map. Establishing a long-term presence in the national consciousness is his next challenge, and it might prove to be more difficult than getting them there in the first place.
  10. I had the chance to sit down for an interview with Wren Baker. We chatted about the state of UNT athletics, why he believed he could turn the Mean Green into consistent winners, and the future of the https://marketscale.com/industries/sports-and-entertainment/wren-baker
  11. STATS STATS STATS http://www.cfbstats.com/2018/national/index.html Top 25 rankings through Monday, September 10, 2018 OFFENSE Scoring Offense - 11th at 52 ppg Passing Offense - 1st at 457.5 ypg Total Offense - 14th at 568 ypg Field Goals - Tied 1st at 3.5 made pg PAT - Tied 1st 100%, Tied 21st at 5.5 made pg First Downs - 2nd at 33 pg 3rd Down % - 19th at 53.1% Long Scrimmage Yards - Tied 4th of 10+ at 47, Tied 21st of 20+ at 14 Long Punt Returns - Tied 2nd of 20+ at 2, Tied 7th of 30+ at 1 Long Kickoff Returns - Tied 20th of 30+ at 1, Tied 3rd of 40+ at 1, Tied 2nd of 50+, 60+, 70+, 80+, 90+ at 1 DEFENSE Turnover Margin - Tied 18th at 1.5 margin pg (Sacks - just outside tied at 26th at 3 pg) Interceptions - Tied for 15th at 1.5 pg Rushing Defense - Tied at 14th at 74 ypg Total Defense - 20th at 276 ypg Opponent First Downs - 2nd at 10.5 pg Opponent Third Down % - 14th at 24% Opponent Fourth Down % - Tied 1st at 0% Opponent Kickoffs - 20th at 56.25 avg pk Time of Possession - 3rd at 38:45:00 pg Individual Player Rankings Mason Fine - 1st in Passing (431 ypg, 2nd is 40 ypg behind), 2nd in Total Offense (428 ypg, 1st has already played 3 games), Long Passing Plays (3rd 10+, Tied 3rd 20+, Tied 12th 30+) Rico Busseey, Jr. - 12th in Receiving Yardage (118.5 ypg), Long Receiving Plays (Tied 6th 10+, Tied 5th 20+, Tied 17th 30+, Jaelon Darden - 10th in Punt Returns (16.25 avg yppr), Long Punt Return Plays (Tied 3rd 20+, Tied 4th 30+ Cole Hedlund - 1st in Overall Scoring (16 ppg), Tied 1st in Field Goals (3.5 mad pg), Tied 1st in PAT % (100%), Tied 16th in PAT (5.5 made pg) Jalen Guyton - Tied 16th Long Receiving Plays DeAndre Torrey - Tied 2nd, 3rd or 14th in Long Kickoff Return Plays (30+ through 90+ yards) E.J. Ejiya - Tied 16th in Sacks (2), Tied 5th in Tackles For Loss (5), Tied 2nd in Kicks/Punts Blocked (1) Kemon Hall - Tied 3rd in Interceptions (2), Tied 11th for Passes Defended (4)
  12. Another uniform thread! https://ucfknights.exposure.co/a-familiar-flight These may be the most bad-ass alternate/throwback/feauxback/tribute uniforms I've ever seen. It's chock full of little details and even some trolling of USF. I love it.
  13. Similar to the interview/breakdown that SBNtion did of "Peter Pan", they wrote something similar of ODU's second win over WKU Saturday: https://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2018/10/22/18007100/old-dominion-wku-ending-2018 Should we care much about the dregs of CUSA-East? Naw, not really. Are the highlights and read of this game entertaining? Hell yeah.
  14. Good afternoon, My wife and I recently had a baby and we were looking to get out for Saturday's game to get some fresh air and root on the Mean Green. If anyone has any tickets for sell/like to give to us, please PM me, we would greatly appreciate it!
  15. https://www.untalumni.com/alumni-awards?2018InsiderSep DISTINGUISHED YOUNG ALUMNI AWARD Created in 2011, this honor was established to recognize alumni under 40 for distinguished career achievement and contributions to society and the university. @JohnWilliams (’05)
 Williams is the principal owner of two popular bars near the Denton Square: East Side Denton and Oak St. Drafthouse and Cocktail Parlor. He also co-owns Dot’s Hop House and Cocktail Courtyard in Dallas’ Deep Ellum neighborhood. Williams is UNT Athletics’ biggest football season ticket holder. He partners with UNT Athletics to sponsor football ticket, tailgate and transportation packages for hundreds of UNT alumni each season. Williams is a member of the Mean Green Scholarship Fund and serves on the UNT Alumni Association’s Denton County Alumni Chapter Steering Committee.
  16. ...and at night ...after some extensive Photoshop/Lightroom work.
  17. The Mean Green could be a threat if they can get their defense up to speed with their offense. They’re a one sided opponent - outscore them, because they can go on offense but they can’t dictate pace." "Strong offense, the wide receiver from Notre Dame [Jaylen Guyton] really stands out on film." "The offensive system is interesting, they’re doing more experimental stuff than you’d expect from a Leach tree OC [Graham Harrell].” read more: https://www.google.com/amp/s/athlonsports.com/college-football/c-usa-coaches-talk-anonymously-about-conference-foes-2018%3Famp
  18. Why is our athletic staff so small compared to other CUSA schools? We only have two compliance employees, a relatively small marketing team, only one graphics guy on board and only three people working in the ticket office. Is this something we can expect to change in the near future? I read a post on this forum referencing the $26 million debt our athletic department has but perhaps this is one of those times where you have to spend money to make money. Also, I made arrangements to be in Denton for SMU weekend (some have speculated that game could be the first sellout in Apogee history) and would appreciate some recommendations for good restaurants and some fun activities to do with the wife and kids while we are in town. I'm trying to avoid the cliche places like Rudy's and etc.
  19. This is a repost from another board in this forum to garner more responses. Why is our athletic staff so small compared to other CUSA schools? We only have two compliance employees, a relatively small marketing team, only one graphics guy on board and only three people working in the ticket office. Is this something we can expect to change in the near future? I read a post on this forum referencing the $26 million debt our athletic department has but perhaps this is one of those times where you have to spend money to make money. Also, I made arrangements to be in Denton for SMU weekend (some have speculated that game could be the first sellout in Apogee history) and would appreciate some recommendations for good restaurants and some fun activities to do with the wife and kids while we are in town. I'm trying to avoid the cliche places like Rudy's and etc.
  20. https://www.sbnation.com/college-footbal...experience
  21. Come join fellow Mean Green fans on Saturday, December 2nd and watch North Texas take on Florida Atlantic for the Conference USA Championship! The Collin County watch party will be at Fuzzy's Taco's in Allen, TX! Fuzzy's is located at 790 W. Exchange Parkway, Allen, TX 75013. The Game and audio will be broadcast on TVs throughout the entire restaurant. Attendees can pick up free UNT schwag like football stress relievers, car emblems, etc. You can also enter the drawing for UNT beer glasses, chrome car emblems, pennants, etc. Kickoff is at 11:00 am.
  22. Free championship t-shirt registration for students. I apologize in advance to all the OGs on the board https://north-texas-athletics.apps.umbel.com/571/mean-green-student-appreciation/
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.