Jump to content

Christopher Walker

Members
  • Posts

    4,630
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    16
  • Points

    2,795 [ Donate ]

Posts posted by Christopher Walker

  1. 17 hours ago, golfingomez said:

    You want a stage large enough to have 1,200 grads (plus all the pomp and circumstance)???? how many of those stages are there?

    The Murch is a pretty badass building for performances

    Circling back around to this... two things:

    1. No stage worth its salt is ever going to be big enough to hold 1200 grads plus a platform party. That's lunacy.
    2. The MPAC, while certainly unique, has been falling apart and sinking for a number of years now. Besides, its only reallllly suitable for large ensemble wind, orchestral, and choral music. Anything outside of those three (read: jazz) is miserable in that space.
    • Lovely Take 2
    • Confused 1
    • Downvote 2
  2. On 2/10/2022 at 5:07 PM, UNT 90 Grad said:

    This thread makes me miss @Christopher Walker.  He would be helping us with the flag code violations this atrocity commits.  

    Besides, it is too similar to UTSA’s battle flag.

    image.jpeg.66d26e89de7df818af8233a514d3787d.jpeg

    Miss everyone, too. And yeah. Whole lotta 4 U.S. Code § 8 violations abound here.

    However, I now live in a land that apparently recognizes no borders, whether state or federal, and you see more of the Old Doug of Cascadia than you do anything else this way:

    2560px-Flag_of_Cascadia.svg.png

    I've raised a few eyebrows flying the North Texas Battle Flag on our street.

    • Upvote 2
    • Confused 1
  3. 9 hours ago, TheColonyEagle said:

    Is recruiting our #1 problem? 

    According to 247 our classes have ranked:

    2018     #8

    2019     #4

    2020     #2

    2021      #1

    Seems to me our recruiting the past 3 years has been the best in CUSA. How do we get someone to get us better classes than #1 in the conference?

    This also highlights how a good coach can win big NEXT season. This is not a rebuild. 

    Since we're in a legitimate place for new comparisons, we should stop holding ourselves to CUSA standards. Here's our recruiting rankings in those same years amongst the lineup of the 2023 AAC that we're joining:

    2018 • 10th / 14 at #101
    2019 • 5th / 14 at #76
    2020 • 3rd / 14 at #68
    2021 • 4th / 14 at #78

    + Current 2022 • 11th / 14 at #119 - yikes

    So those figures aren't too misaligned in trajectory, but the last year and a half are NOT comforting, either. What I think matters more to me, however, is the lack of development from our nice recruiting classes. Development is hard to define but NFL Draft picks is at least a metric, so here we go across the past three seasons with draft rounds in parentheses:

    2019 Draft
    AAC 11 • CUSA 6
    *Houston 3 (1st, 4th, 6th)
    Temple 3 (2nd, 5th, 7th)
    Memphis 2 (3rd, 4th)
    FAU 2 (3rd, 7th)
    *UCF 1 (2nd)
    Charlotte 1 (3rd)
    Tulane 1 (7th)
    *Cincinnati 1 (7th)

    2020 Draft
    AAC 19 • CUSA 10
    Memphis 3 (3rd, 7th)
    Charlotte 2 (3rd, 4th)
    Tulsa 2 (4th, 5th)
    Tulane 2 (5th, 7th)
    Navy 1 (7th)
    *Cincinnati 1 (3rd)
    SMU 1 (6th)
    *Houston 1 (3rd)
    *UCF 1 (4th) 
    FAU 1 (4th)

    2021 Draft
    AAC 19 • CUSA 4
    *UCF 6 (2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 7th) - 8th most represented school overall in draft
    *Cincinnati 4 (4th, 5th, 7th)
    *Houston 3 (1st, 6th, 7th) 
    SMU 2 (3rd, 4th)
    Tulane 2 (4th, 7th)
    Tulsa 1 (1st)
    UAB 1 (4th)
    North Texas 1 (4th)
    East Carolina 1 (4th)
    Memphis 1 (5th)

    *these schools of course are onwards and upwards.

    This is I think the better company we should be seeking to achieve, and thus shoot for coaches who can not only maintain and build on the recruiting trajectory – finish top 60, anyone? – but also aim for one to two draft picks a year as well.

  4. 4 hours ago, keith said:

    It's actually not the "diving eagle."  It's this:

    image.png.471be3dbc3007929ff17cf8507a8590e.png

    Which is worse.

    The problem with our university mark/logo (the connected eagle and UNT or even the eagle alone) is it doesn't translate well when it's minimized to fit on a web page with other school logos or on the TV screen score banner.  The dimensions are all wrong.    

    Here are a few examples that attempt to use the diving eagle....

    No one not from UNT would know what that white blob in the middle of the green circle is.

    image.png.4078ca63ee55a64a5aa8e28bb3bfc9c8.png

    The second one is a little better, but again is mostly unrecognizable to anyone not already in the know.

    image.png.bf930e8d26b11e157c39bfeb7314c586.png

    Here's how we look on ESPN (at least they are trying to use our official logo):

    image.png.f72eb0a28ed0bc9142a9f33d433c17cd.png

    Compare that to the Texas Tech (or even FIU logo for that matter):

    image.png.b1d82fa592a757a3b145b1bc9420085a.png

    Compare what ESPN is doing with our official logo to:

    image.png.0a3d65ec82613a1419b421b7e3e0d65f.png    or    image.png.8fbf65f9f4e8db34911cb335a84b2f51.png     

     

    While we are at it (and this is going to be controversial) I think it's time for us to emphasize UNT over North Texas.  UNT is the school, North Texas is a region.  Personally, I don't like seeing N. Texas, North Tex, Nor Tex or the absolute worst, No Texas listed in various college scores.

     

     

     

    You beat me to each and every point of my response. The ESPN bit in particular is continually infuriating because you know our SID was told by URCM UBSC to only reference the diving eagle-word mark and it looks TURRIBLE.

    • Upvote 1
  5. On 3/30/2021 at 5:03 PM, drex said:

    Is Lettrell even aware of what men's basketball has accomplished?  In the old days Hayden Fry said that basketball success and football success helped recruiting for all our teams.

    Because I'm not sure if you're serious or not... 

     

     

    • Thanks 1
    • Confused 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.