Jump to content

BillySee58

Moderators
  • Posts

    11,824
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    138
  • Points

    55,180 [ Donate ]

Posts posted by BillySee58

  1. On 11/28/2023 at 12:47 PM, 97and03 said:

    We seem to lose a star receiver almost every year due to portal or graduation. Perhaps losing starting O-linemen are more concerning. 

    Yeah I’d say so. Especially because as we raise NIL money, we may have money to retain some of the top skill players but offensive line might be where the gap in NIL pool between us and the P5s starts to show.

    • Upvote 2
  2. 11 hours ago, 97and03 said:

    So should we assume that we have lost a WR somewhere along the way? WR was definitely not a priority position to fill out this class unless we lost one. Did I miss a decommit? 

    Seems like an outside receiver. We had 4 receivers committed before Spradley-Demps decommitted. Not sure if they considered him an outside guy or not but possibly since both Barnes and Coleman are slot guys.

  3. 1 minute ago, C Rod said:

    Money talks. Don’t sleep on SMU. Boatloads of NIL cash, in the same metro market, and now P5 ACC opponents to play against during his last year of eligibility. 

    I’m gonna sleep on SMU when it comes to who we might lose Chandler Rogers to. Their QB is only a sophomore.

    • Upvote 6
  4. 17 hours ago, Cr1028 said:

    That was when we first were going to the new Briles system and Wallis was supposed to be the guy. Then that stuff happened, Wallis had to resign, Bloesch had to try and call the Briles offense while Shanbour and that other grad assistant were left to coach the quarterbacks.

    Bloesch had the co-OC title heading into that season with Mainord but Littrell was calling the plays. Neither Wallis nor Bloesch were ever tasked with calling the offense that season.

    • Upvote 2
    • Thanks 2
  5. On 11/20/2023 at 8:38 AM, El Paso Eagle said:

    Not to put a negative Twist on it, but in the world of the transfer portal, if you have a true freshman who should be on the field, is it worth redshirting them?

    Yeah I’m not as concerned about preserving redshirts either. Especially if it’s a guy you expect to be starter caliber in year 2.

    • Upvote 3
  6. 9 hours ago, MeanGreen22 said:

    The secondary is gonna be a no fly zone in a year or 2. So many talented freshman making big plays. 

    Brian Nelson also is tied for second on the team in passes broken up despite having only played in 4 games. Really excited about the future of this secondary with Nelson, Patrick Smith, Jayven Anderson, Evan Jackson, and even Taylor Starling started that ACU game but looks like he’ll still redshirt. 

    • Upvote 4
  7. On 10/4/2023 at 6:06 PM, UNTLifer said:

    Looking at the current roster of 14, the only one I don't think is on scholarship is Allo.  If that is correct, then we are full.

    Terrance Dixon was never announced as a signing on Meangreensports. Usually with scholarship guys there is an article on the site that officially announces the addition, whereas they don’t do that for walkons. So I think there is one spot left, but they are likely saving it for next year with only one actual Senior on the roster.

    • Upvote 1
    • Lovely Take 1
  8. 56 minutes ago, El Paso Eagle said:

    So a multi-billion dollar industry where we would not be able to exist unless students were forced to pay fees. Sorry, but the "multi-billion" gets spread a little thick when the reality is not that many schools make money. 

    It really doesn’t when you look at the revenue at play here. But I like how you don’t skip a beat to change the topic and ignore being blatantly wrong about your claim that NIL was created so student athletes could have the ability to have a job like a normal student.

    • Upvote 1
    • Downvote 1
  9. On 10/1/2023 at 9:37 AM, El Paso Eagle said:

    Harry I'm not questioning that. I'm just trying to get an understanding of how this works. When nil first came out it was supposed to give the athletes the ability to have a job like a quote unquote normal student. However as we all know it quickly turned into pay for play.

    Lol come on. Student athletes could always have jobs. It was not “supposed to” do anything other than lift the unconstitutional restrictions the NCAA had placed on its student athletes regarding their ability to earn money from the multi billion dollar industry that was exploiting their labor. And that the NCAA should be subject to Sherman Act scrutiny.

    https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-135/ncaa-v-alston/

    • Upvote 2
    • Thanks 1
    • Downvote 2
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.