Jump to content

SMU2006

Members
  • Posts

    568
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2
  • Points

    8,545 [ Donate ]

Posts posted by SMU2006

  1. 50 minutes ago, MeanGreenZen said:

    Remember Sonny Dykes? I bet you do.
    He said about transfers, “If they weren’t playing where they were, they probably won’t play for you.”

    I believe there are exceptions to that. But overall, the best transfers to UNT have been proven guys that we got from lower levels. Not the guys who were highly-rated out of high school, signed with a P4 and then never saw the field there. 

    From the P4, I would be on the lookout for a guy like Marcus Trice. He demonstrated that he could be productive at a high level, but fell down the depth chart on a very talented roster. Grab those guys and give them an opportunity.

    Sonny was able to accelerate the turnaround at SMU through the transfer portal so......

    • Upvote 1
  2. 2 hours ago, TIgreen01 said:

    It's amusing that these smu trolls are as thrilled as they are over this hire.  He was at USC for ELEVEN years.  FGCU was a long time ago.  He recruits at a high enough level that they may be able to get out of the cellar of the ACC, but he looks a lot like a Will Wade type guy to me.  Expect trouble and underachievement when up against the really big boys. Good luck....NOT.

    He was in the Elite 8 in 2021 and has recruited at an elite level.  Plenty to be excited about w/ Enfield.

  3. 3 hours ago, dodgefan said:

    Maybe that was one of the reasons he was canned. June Jones knows, what happens when you lose to us. lol

    He was canned b/c he is in no way prepared to handle the rigors of the ACC.  He was a mediocre AAC coach and his record/recruiting proves it.  He'll probably do ok for what Rice expects (which is nothing).

    • Upvote 1
    • Downvote 1
  4. 29 minutes ago, UNTLifer said:

    I think what you were looking to say is Rice has different standards, which isn't too difficult since SMU has none.

    Rice has all but given up on athletics.  Its sad but them's the breaks if you don't adapt to where college athletics is headed.  Prayers up for the feisty night birds!

    • Upvote 1
    • Eye Roll 1
    • Downvote 1
  5. 2 hours ago, MrAlien said:

    Kind of a no brainer if you ask me, he's coming off 20 wins, he knows the conference and recruiting at this level. 

    20 wins yet finished the year losing 6 of the last 7.  Also blew multiple double digit second half leads.  Combine that with his reluctance to embrace NIL and his goose was cooked. 

    Rob is a really nice man though.  Very thoughtful and well-liked by players and opposing coaches.  I wish him well at Rice.

    • Upvote 1
    • Eye Roll 1
    • Downvote 1
  6. 29 minutes ago, MeanGreenTexan said:

    Y'all really are clueless.

    I bet Duke is watching the addition of Cal/Stanford/SMU, and the attempts by FSU/Clemson to buy out (I bet others aren't far behind) carefully.    ACC will be a dinosaur (like the PAC12) soon enough.   Enjoy your couple of years with it in tact.   I honestly hope to have SMU back in the AAC when the dust settles.

    The Office Lol GIF by NETFLIX

    • Downvote 2
  7. 23 hours ago, JT Hammons said:

    We are already struggling to compete in this conference as it is even with SMU leaving.  I am not sure that heading west would be a good move.  I do agree with you that we will probably lose some teams to ACC.  The key seems to be Florida State and what they do.  After being undefeated and not going to playoffs the writing is on the wall.

    There will continue to be jockeying between the AAC/MWC/PAC to create a "best of the rest" conference that gets the conference champion access to the playoff.

    • Upvote 1
    • Downvote 1
  8. 13 hours ago, rcade said:

    The incentive for the ACC to work out a deal is to avoid the risk of losing in court and having the grant of rights ruled unenforceable, letting any school leave with no compensation to the conference.

    The links above explained how both sides take a huge risk letting these cases reach a court judgment.

     

    Good luck with the legal argument that the GoR, willingly and lawfully agreed to by every ACC member institution, is unenforceable. The legal precedent/argument is clearly on the side of the ACC.  They know it.  FSU knows.  Every other ACC institution knows it as well.

    • Sad 1
    • Eye Roll 2
    • Downvote 3
  9. 7 hours ago, Meangreen Fight said:

    You should know money talks and BS walks.  What happens if ESPN call the lower value ACC team’s bluff and tell you that letting FSU go will make them happy?  You don’t want to piss off the ultimate sugar daddy.  
     

    ESPN- Tell you what ACC irrelevants and your cabin boy SMU; you can either divide up your portion of the remainder of the promised revenue now and go away or the next contract we offer your school will be cents on the dollar.  Mind you in the meantime until your contract run out we are going to put as many of your games on at bad time slots and behind a paywall and show your real independent value without us.  
     

    Rememberthe money is coming from the distributors and advertising on the games.  Hurting and restricting FSU, Clemson, Virginia Tech, Miami, and North Carolina is bad for viewership numbers.  
     

    Ah yes nothing like ESPN trying to actively de-value its own property (ACC) so that they can let FSU walk over to FOX/Big 10, a  direct competitor.  ESPN is locked into a sweetheart deal with the ACC through 2036.  They have absolutely zero incentive to de-stabilize the league and risk losing valuable properties to their competition.

    Brilliant stuff champ!

    • Upvote 1
    • Downvote 3
  10. 8 minutes ago, greenminer said:

    Interest/desire is too strong to care about Congress.  Lots of "let's get it done and we will figure this out later" movement going on.

    We'll find out, one way or the other.

    Wrong again.  Congress is absolutely going to get involved here.  Grandstanding and poking their noses where it doesn't belong is what Congress does best.  

    • Upvote 1
    • Downvote 3
  11. 49 minutes ago, greenminer said:

    What have you read that makes you believe this?

    I'm talking about a complete split.  The B10/SEC will no longer share a playoff/system with the rest of us.

    Even with some truth, I think that will be short term.  A complete split, with zero playoff involvement for the rest of us, is on the horizon.

    Your scenario will be too exclusionary and would result in the mother of all antitrust lawsuits.  Big 10 and SEC will throw the Big 12/ACC a bone and keep them in the loop to avoid Congress getting involved.

    • Downvote 3
    • Puking Eagle 1
  12. 37 minutes ago, NT80 said:

    No, it's an all-inclusive exit fee.   They could just leave now without media rights, but the lawsuit is about all of it.

    Sorry, your best teams in your new conference will soon be leaving, lol!

    Welcome to the AAC 2.0

    and irrespective of if/when FSU can get out the obvious moves are to add SDSU, USF, and Tulane.  Is it the SEC or the Big 10?  Nope.  Is it the AAC?  Not even close.

    Being in a conference with Stanford/CAL/Louisville/GA Tech/Miami/Duke/WF/NC State/PITT/BC/Syracuse is light years better than the AAC even if there are a couple defections along the way.

    • Downvote 3
    • Puking Eagle 1
  13. 33 minutes ago, NT80 said:

    No, it's an all-inclusive exit fee.   They could just leave now without media rights, but the lawsuit is about all of it.

    Sorry, your best teams in your new conference will soon be leaving, lol!

    Welcome to the AAC 2.0

    Your lack of understanding of the GoR and the ACC's motivations for enforcing it are staggering.

    There is ZERO incentive for the ACC to cooperate with FSU and allow them to exit for simply a monetary fee.  They have every legal and fiscal reason to fight them tooth and nail (which they will do and are doing) b/c once the precedent is set you could see Clemson and UNC follow suit.

    FSU will still be an ACC member in a decade.  Book it.

    • Eye Roll 1
    • Downvote 3
    • Puking Eagle 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.