Jump to content

GrayEagle

Members
  • Posts

    5,099
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6
  • Points

    30,890 [ Donate ]

Posts posted by GrayEagle

  1. On 9/6/2023 at 2:33 PM, Mean Green 93-98 said:

    Tiffin University?  I can't say that I ever heard of that.  Whatever happened to whatever New Mexico college he was at previously?

    He graduated from there.  He is a graduate student at Tiffin.  I hope that he finishes.  He was a great teammate here.  He did a good job here in very limited appearances.  I'm glad to hear that he is doing well.

  2. I don't know that the ACC is looking for an additional member at this time.  Their next step is to try to get Notre Dame as a full member.  The Irish contract for football is up for renewal soon and from what I hear the future doesn't look quite as bright.  If the ACC is able to get ND football to join their other sports in the ACC, that would make the ACC a pretty solid conference provided they can keep what they have...especially the major seven of Clemson, Florida State, Miami, North Carolina, North Carolina State, Virginia and Virginia Tech.  The other five look solid.

  3. I neglected to say it's not the DFW media pushing SMU it's the D media...as in Dallas Morning News.  There was a time when SMU was deserving of the publicity that they received.  Doak Walker, Kyle Rote, Forrest Gregg and Don Meredith were Hall of Famers who were worthy of their fame.  Scandals kept others from receiving rewards.  Still, the DMN kept pushing SMU.  It's the reason that SMU has received more publicity; third only to UT and A&M.

    • Upvote 2
    • Puking Eagle 1
  4. On 9/6/2023 at 12:09 PM, untjim1995 said:

    Listen or read the DFW media and they love the SMU deal to get into the ACC. Ok, since they used their money and political clout to get in over there, they pulled off a move that nobody else in the G5 has been able to do. 

    But what just galls me is hearing all of them say that SMU should have been in the Big 12 this entire time, that if TCU and Baylor or in, then SMU should be, too. And I have no idea why they always say this. SMU has never shown an ability to compete in a league of power schools since the Pony Expre$$ day$. They have no decent following. They don't produce sports journalists, They have no recent winning history to sell. Just Death Penalty stories, days of SWC glory in the Doak Walker days, and a ton of cash.

    I truly don't get it.

    I think that there are two reasons.  One is their past history.  They played in the old Southwest Conference (and did well).  They did better than TCU and the Frogs are in the Big XII.  SMU and Rice are the oldies that haven't advanced.  The other is their recent history.  They've had a number of All-Americans (more than TCU) and the DMN believes that they have received more publicity than most of the Big XII.  Most of the positive spin lately has come from the Dallas Morning News but SMU is not that strong currently.  They've been in the AAC for 13 years and have not won a football championship. 

    • Upvote 1
    • Puking Eagle 1
  5. 7 hours ago, keith said:

    You know, we'd be pretty good as long as we play teams that are significantly worse than us.

    My point was that you can't constantly play a killer schedule when you are new...both coaches and players (at least to each other).  Don't worry, the last six games will be tough enough.

    • Upvote 1
  6. Nothing is certain until it happens but I believe that Eric Morris will right the ship.  He faced a team that turned out to be better than predicted.

    The next four games should be a much lesser challenge.  It's very possible that he could win all four.  He can look at film and analyst's notes and see where coaches need to correct.  Some of the coaches do not have a lot of experience coaching but all have been around football long enough to know where corrections are needed.  They know that they need to learn quickly.  It's not time to panic yet.  

     

    • Upvote 6
    • Oh Boy! 1
    • Eye Roll 1
  7. The number can vary widely on who's available and who we can afford.  We are getting pretty high-rated recruits and I'd hate to pass on them in order to get a rather short term senior unless it's a real position of need.  Several of our recruits now could play as freshmen especially against lower rated teams.  A few would be starters as sophomores.  We don't really have the deep NIL pocket to chase forty or fifty transfers.  Many are in there because they weren't getting the playing time, in their last year classification or just want to see if they can get the big bucks.  Don't get me wrong, if you can afford to spend every year you can put together some talented teams.  As I understand it, Cal bought 50 players from the Transfer Portal and it looks like they got their money's worth.  We seemed to have very good recruiting personnel so I would take less than 50% from the transfer portal.  Let's wait to the end of the season and find where our true weaknesses are.

  8. Scott, you are as rabid about UNT sports as maybe anyone I've known.  I've known and enjoyed your company for what??? Thirty five or forty years?  I'm not sure that we had enough talent to win that game even if our coaching, personnel and formations had been better.  For Game Day they had us beaten in all three phases of the game.  They had the ball twice as long as we did.

    I hope (and expect that Eric will not be at this disadvantage the rest of the season.  I still expect him to win the next four games.  None of them are close to the talent of Cal.

    The best news at the game was that DATCU donated $500,000 to UNT.  That will enable the university to start the expansion of the Athletic Center and possibly enable our getting a few players out of the portal next year and/or recruiting top players.  

    • Upvote 6
    • Thanks 1
  9. It isn't dead (and I use that term respectfully) yet, although UNC it appears will definitely vote no.  No vote was taken due to a professor being shot to death on the UNC campus. It had been rumored that the one vote was found which would allow it to pass.  The Commissioner of the ACC had announced that another vote would not be taken unless he was sure that it would pass.  Rumor was that Clemson was the changed vote.  Until it actually happens though, it's just speculation.

    The other members have a valid point about increased travel costs but that will be eased by Stanford and Cal taking just 30% each and SMU 0.

    • Upvote 2
    • Oh Boy! 1
  10. They go strictly by ratings.  Mazin Roberts wouldn't be anything because he started out Division II.  Does anyone think that he is still that low-ranked? 

    I used to give a lot of credence to the number of stars; but no more.  That's not to say many ratings are wrong but some of our three-star recruits got four stars when a P-5 took them.

    • Upvote 2
  11. 17 hours ago, UNTLifer said:

    Nor a stable conference, but then you morons would dump $100 million to join a conference that will be raided in the next five years and you will be left playing the bottom half of the ACC.

    Lifer, there is one thing that will keep the ACC from being raided and they are trying to get Notre Dame as a football member.  I believe that Clemson voted for admittance for the three so it looks as if they're staying.  It's unstable but could straighten out in the next eight years.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.