-
Posts
15,397 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
36 -
Points
38,950 [ Donate ]
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
GoMeanGreen.com
Posts posted by Mean Green 93-98
-
-
3 hours ago, SMU2006 said:
No, Stanford/CAL wanted to be associated with schools that had students who can read above the fourth grade level which eliminates virtually all the schools in the Truck Stop 12.
Revisionist history. Obviously, their first choice was the Big 10, but after they got an unequivocal "Get lost" from them, the next option they tried was the Big 12. Who also told them no. Trying the ACC came after the other options failed.
And now the entrance of those 3 bottom feeder schools is causing the better ACC schools to try to find any loophole they can they might get them out of that conference.
- 5
- 1
- 1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
1 hour ago, SMU2006 said:The ACC is by every quantifiable measure a superior conference to the new Big 12.
I mean, the ACC just accepted 3 teams who wanted into, but were rejected by, the Big 12.
- 10
- 1
-
On 1/18/2024 at 9:28 AM, SMU2006 said:
Not condescending in the slightest. Chandler is a very good addition and should thrive at the AAC level.
Do you realize how quickly you shifted back into condescension mode?
- 2
- 1
- 1
-
59 minutes ago, UNTLifer said:
Nope, it’s Hall. Considered part of the team.
True, but not considered part of the roster.
- 1
-
Is there somebody else we're not thinking of? It seems strange that they would count players not on the roster toward the roster.
-
49 (and counting!) new scholarship players in one class....I wonder how much that shatters whatever our previous record was.
- 2
-
1 minute ago, 97and03 said:
So we are taking fliers on low character guys now? Great.
In fairness, if we are going to take a flier on a low character guy, this is the low character guy* we want to take a flier on. He could be the most elite defensive player who has taken the field for us since Booger Kennedy.
* I'm not saying he is low character. He's done some clearly bad things in times past, and it's certainly possible he's changed his course.
- 4
- 1
-
I remember this guy back several years ago was a Penn State commit, and he was one of the best commits in their class. Then he ran into some serious legal trouble so Penn State had to take away the offer.
Hopefully, he's been keeping his nose clean.
- 1
-
2 minutes ago, VideoEagle said:
Not sure where or how you got the bizarre idea I thought Morris did a better job than Deion.
The post to which I was responding literally said, "Compare [Morris's] record to [Sanders']."
5 minutes ago, VideoEagle said:I just pointed out that historically, coaches taking over teams with 0-2 wins overwhelmingly improve on the total wins in their first year. Coaches taking over teams with six or more wins only improve on the previous year's record a little less than 1/3 of the time. Expecting Morris to improve our record in his first year is the same as expecting a 3 to come up more often in craps than a 6 - it is possible but not likely.
Of course coaches taking over teams with 0-2 wins overwhelmingly improve. It's hard to do much worse, right? But do they overwhelmingly improve by 3 wins? If not, then your attempted refutation of my point fails.
And again, my point was not just that Morris didn't improve on our record; he also made it 2 wins worse.
So again, my point that Deion did a better coaching job than Morris last year stands. I hope that changes next year.
- 1
-
3 minutes ago, VideoEagle said:
Yes, coaches taking over teams with 0-2 wins overwhelmingly improve on their predecessor's record in their first year. Coaches taking over 6+ win teams only improve about 1 out of 3 times. The better the record of the team you take over, the less likely you will improve in your first year.
Do coaches taking over teams with 0-2 wins overwhelmingly add 3 wins to that total their first year?
Do coaches taking over teams with 6+ wins overwhelmingly subtract 2 wins from that total their first year?
To insinuate that our coach did a better job than Deion did because he won one more game is absurd.
- 4
- 1
-
3 minutes ago, wardly said:
List all the 1st year coaches and compare his record to theirs. While there are some coaches that have winning seasons after their predecessor has been fired they are in the minority.For example the Northwestern coach did, the Colorado coach didn't.
The Colorado coach won 4 games his first year, while taking over a team that only won one game the previous year.
Deion clearly wins that battle over our coach.
- 3
- 1
- 2
- 1
-
24 minutes ago, GoGreenBeans said:
we can't compare 1st year Morris to last year Littrell. Seth had built something here, while Morris is still building up
This doesn't make much sense. You have to judge a coaching job based on what he stepped into. Littrell only won 5 games his first year; but considering he inherited a 1-win team and installed polar opposite offensive and defensive systems, that was a solid B+ coaching job.
When Mosely hired Morris, the assumption was that he would be able to pick right up where Littrell left off and improve on it, considering they come from basically the same school of coaching.
EDIT: Looks like @MeanGreenTexan was already typing the same thing when I started typing.
- 3
- 1
- 1
-
34 minutes ago, El Paso Eagle said:
A for Offense = 4.0
F for Defence = 0.0
B for S Teams = 3.0
So overall, 2.33 (C- sounds about right)Fair enough. But personally, if I'm the professor, I'm weighing wins and losses a whole lot more heavily than stats. So taking a 7-win team--a record deemed unacceptable--down to a 5-win team has to get a bad grade.
- 1
- 1
-
That seems a little generous. I like the guy, and his offense shows promise. But when you clearly underperform the guy who just got fired, that has to be a D.
- 4
- 2
- 2
- 3
-
2 minutes ago, Big Z said:
In my opinon - Diego Pavia - CUSA Player of the Year
Took New Mexico State to new heights and also pull an upset on Auburn at their house. Nothing phases him and he's super competitive.
If Jerry Kill is part of the package, I'm in.
-
5 minutes ago, TreeFiddy said:
We don't exactly have the best track with P5 QB transfers named Morris. Let's hope this one fares a little better.
I assume you're talking about Alec Morris? It's not like he was a bust. It's just that Mason Fine exploded on the scene.
And if the same thing happens with next fall's P5 transfer and new freshman on the scene, I'll be just fine with it.
- 7
-
34 minutes ago, herewego said:
I just don't understand the excitement on this pick up.
Who were you hoping for?
- 2
-
This is a graduate transfer, correct?
- 1
- 1
-
Note in his H.S. Scouting Report whom the analyst uses as his "Comparison" QB:
https://247sports.com/Player/chandler-morris-46040236/
- 2
-
1 hour ago, GrayEagle said:
A Democrat quarterback???
- 2
- 1
- 2
- 1
-
33 minutes ago, cousin oliver said:
What about Sark?
They've mentioned him as a candidate. Most people think he would be crazy to leave UT for Alabama. About as likely as Kirby Smart leaving Georgia for Alabama.
- 1
-
I guess I missed something. . . . How is he polarizing?
- 1
-
5 minutes ago, El Paso Eagle said:
Thanks, NLI
With the current climate of players being able to transfer pretty much willy nilly, I can't see any reason why they wouldn't let a player out of his NLI under those conditions.
-
26 minutes ago, El Paso Eagle said:
Should players who sign with a school whose coach leaves right after the signing be allowed out of their NIL?
NIL or NLI (National Letter of Intent)?
- 1
- 1
Another example - FBS needs to restructure
in Mean Green Football
Posted
I assume you mean "whose revisionist history"? The sentence (phrase) still doesn't make sense.
Yes, Florida State already had its eyes on the exit, which already says something about the recent desirability of the conference. But the 3 best athletic schools in the conference voted against adding the 3 new schools, because they see the additions as downgrading their conference even further. And now they clearly want out more than ever.
Again, all 3 schools wanted into the Big 12 before they ever turned toward the ACC. Now you want to brag up the ACC because that's where you are headed; that's understandable. But you know that if the Big 12 had been willing to take SMU, you never would have bothered writing your last paragraph above.