Jump to content

VideoEagle

Members
  • Posts

    5,239
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2
  • Points

    17,580 [ Donate ]

Posts posted by VideoEagle

  1. 6 hours ago, MeanGreen01 said:

    I played QB in high school, it was only 28 years ago and have found 70 extra pounds since then. The good news is I’m only requiring $50/month from the collective, could help around the athletic facility when not watching film, and could assist others with homework. Let me know who I need to call, thinking I should start with Morris. He’ll make me a first rounder! 

    Thanks, Paul Blake. We'll let you know.

    • Upvote 1
    • Haha 5
  2. 8 hours ago, TheReal_jayD said:

    North Texas has had to many walks on out perfoming scholarship guys the last 3-4 years. 

    While I'm happy for the success of those walk-ons, I think this shows we've had a problem evaluating talent. Don't get me wrong - NO ONE always gets talent evaluation right. And almost every team has a walk-on that was misevaluated and later earned a scholarship. But NT has been having too many walk-ons outperforming scholarship guys. 

    • Upvote 3
    • Thanks 1
  3. 3 hours ago, GMG_Dallas said:

    The point is, mid-season change can be done without throwing the season away as was suggested would happen if a certain DC was fired.

    Can you name three examples in the last five years of a team firing a coordinator mid-season and that unit improving its performance? Can it happen? Yes, but very rarely. The majority of the time the unit remains mostly the same. 

     

    • Upvote 2
  4. On 12/2/2023 at 5:24 PM, GMG_Dallas said:

    I don't ever want to hear/read that we can't fire a coordinator or head coach mid-season.

    Every month, someone wins the Lotto. Every day, people draw to inside straights. Occasionally, you get lucky. Usually, you don't. 

    • Upvote 2
  5. Thanks for doing this! I notice the pattern reported in a formal study from 2012 still holds. Teams with 6-6 or better records have about a 1 in 3 chance of improving their record with a new coach. This year, of the nine 6-6 or better teams that got new coaches, three improved their records from the year before.

    It doesn't seem to matter if you are a P5 or G5, bringing in a new coach only has a 33% chance of improving the first year IF you are .500 or better! The study from 2012 looked back over eight years and found the same pattern. 

    • Upvote 1
    • Thanks 1
  6. 5 hours ago, wardly said:

    So the reward for winning the AAC championship is playing 6&6 B.C. in a second rate bowl in New York? In fact, I think most of our bowl opponents are 6&6. Not a big step up from CUSA and SBC conferences.

    Not even in New York. It’s a second rate bowl in a baseball stadium in Boston. 

  7. 4 minutes ago, greenminer said:

    Contracts work according to whatever they say and signed up for.  Which could be anything.  I totally get this notion that, "I would never sign up for anything that lets them adjust my pay or position", but there is some precedent here.

    Off the top of my head, the Baylor President was removed from his role - not fired - after the Briles fiasco.  He was "reassigned", before ultimately resigning himself.

    An Oberlin woman's lacrosse coach said some things about transexuals competing in the sport that the university did not like.  She was not fired.  She claims she did not break any rules.  She was reassigned due to "breach of trust."

    Do I think these are exact parallels? No.  But one possible takeaway is, if you really want someone moved, a way could be found.

    First, I used to hear about coaches being reassigned rather than being fired a lot more. UT did it with someone, but could not cut the coaches salary. Baylor kept Ken Starr’s salary then same. I’m not sure about the lacrosse coach. I suspect, but do not know, football head coaching contracts might contain a no reassignment clause. 

  8. The NCAA started allowing, but not requiring, multiyear scholarships in 2012. A few years later, the autonomous conferences - Pac 12, Big 10, SEC, ACC, Big XII, plus Notre Dame - agreed to have multiyear scholarships for football. One website, Informedathlete.com, started calling this a rule and this has been widely quoted by other websites. But there wasn't an enforcement mechanism ever implemented - if a school chose to ignore the agreement, there was never any penalty. It was never an NCAA rule. And it appears there were always multiple exceptions to it that individual conferences and even schools had. Generally, if there was a change in head coach players that didn't fit the new scheme were encouraged (and usually helped) to move on and free up the scholarships for players that fit the new scheme. 

  9. 31 minutes ago, NT80 said:

    No, I'm talking about the 10-year extension in 2021.  Bjork was afraid LSU was going to try and hire Jimbo away in 2021, so he bumped up the salary and started a new 10-year deal...

    After signing Fisher to a 10-year, $75 million contract in 2017 to lure him away from Florida State, Texas A&M doubled down in September 2021, extending him through 2031 to the tune of nearly $95 million, fully guaranteed.Nov 12, 2023

    I can't remember where I saw the articles, but more than one talked about how Sharp and the regents are keeping a very low profile on this because Sharp was the one leading the charge to sign Fisher to the $95 million guaranteed contract. Bjork wanted to extend Fisher, but not as long and with more performance bonuses than guarantees. Apparently Sharp told Bjork if he wouldn't go along with the deal,  the regents would find someone who would. 

    • Oh Boy! 1
  10. 2 hours ago, NT80 said:

    A$M's AD is the one who should have been fired.  He is the bonehead that gave Fisher the guaranteed 10-year deal then lets him go only 2 years into it.

    No, he argued against it but was overruled by Chancellor John Sharp and a majority of the A&M regents. Bjork wanted Fisher, but not with the crazy contract. 
     

    Bjork isn’t getting fired now because he’s helping deflect the heat from Sharp and the Regents. 

  11. There are a lot of reasons to be optimistic about next year. Many have been listed above. The professionals that analyze teams for a living like the writers at DCTF think we should be optimistic as well. I put more trust in those folks that can spend lots of time, resources, and money doing their research. 
    Looking back, there were many here last year convinced we’d only win 3 games with a tougher conference and what was thought to be a couple of tough OCC games. We did better in a conference of our peers than they thought. 

     

    • Upvote 2
    • Oh Boy! 1
    • Eye Roll 1
    • Puking Eagle 1
  12. There’s a great article by Tim Cowlishaw in today’s DMN on A&Ms hire. A few things he points out:

    * In the 40 years of the SWC before WWIi, Aggie only won two SWC titles.

    * In the 80 years after WWII, they had one decade of success with 7 titles between 85 and 94, but never came close to a National Championship. 

    * During their time in the BigXII they had one conference championship.

    * In 16 years in the SEC, they have never been very close to a conference championship. 

    * Coaches cannot automatically bring success from previous schools as they will no longer have the assistants, staff, and institutional structure that supported them before. All of those things must be rebuilt and that will almost certainly take years to accomplish. 

    Here's a link, but it is behind a paywall.   
     

    https://

    • Upvote 3
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.