mad dog

This should go without saying, but please do not repost information, particularly for-pay information, from other websites. This is expressly against their user agreement, and reposting it here can get us in trouble. Thanks for your help in keeping gmg.com 100% lawsuit free!

This. Great win, but tap the brakes on coach of the future talk. At least for now.

Is every five star recruit an All-American? But you still want them, right?

I'm with SUMG on the time zone thing. Good fit for all involved, and best of luck to them.

This.

Yes. Although wild card connotes more of an unknown quantity, so it may be more accurate to say that his role may be the wild card, not him or his ideas.

I have a motion and a second. All in favor?

Bower may have magic sauce. I don't know. But I would be VERY disappointed with a 24 hour turnaround crony hire. The University of North Texas can ill afford another 4 years of fail here. I'd much rather take an extra week or two to interview five or six quality candidates than rush into a familiar situation. Hell, pick up the phone and call the name guys - what do you have to lose? You will fail to land 100% of the candidates you don't ask. Let's kick the tires and see what we can rustle up.

Part of my job is performance measurement - figuring out what the roles and responsibilities of various operating departments are, and then determining whether or not they are fulfilling them. Whenever we start developing these measures, we must first ask the question: what is the goal of the operation? A police department's goal might be keeping the crime rate low - an accounts payable department might be getting all invoices paid within 30 days. Whatever the metric is, it must answer the question "why have a (fill in the blank) department." You can't define success or failure without first agreeing on the task to be performed. Different people on the board believe that the job of the head football coach is anything from winning football games to developing young men into leaders. It may be either of these, both of them, or neither. I suspect that whatever the expectations of Todd Dodge are, they're spelled out in his contract. If I had a copy of the contract in front of me, I could probably tell you what he was hired to do. If he was hired to win games, he's clearly failed in that. A 14% winning rate cannot be treated as anything but an unequivocable disaster. Now, if leadership development is a goal, then thing like graduation rates, dropout rates, and incidence of post-college incarceration may be effective measures to determine if this is being done. There may be others, like fund raising and UNT Athletics marketing; and those would have more subjective (though no less compelling) measures. Most of the time, these measures are clearly weighted in the contract (winning games may be 50%, fund raising 25%, leadership development 25%). If they aren't, then that's probably what we should be debating. Success or failure isn't arbitrary, but it can look that way if everyone is grading different functions.

I still have the .mp3 somewhere. If you pm me your email, i'll send it to you if I find it.

Funny enough, I asked the great Brad Kadlubar that very same question back in the day. He said that the reason is that there are two very different mechanics. Not to say that a punter COULDN'T be a good kicker. Just that people usually focus on building different mechanics and timing.

I show North Texas overall as 5th nationally in raw punting yardage - this doesn't account for other teams using multiple punters, but it should be close enough to compare. The same stat sheet shows: * Tied for 2nd in touchbacks with 5 * 59th in punting average at 41.4 * 15th in punts per game at 6.3 * 93th in net punting average with 33.97

Yes, TD is still the coach as far as I know. Some jerkwad was going with a hard count. I think most of us stayed onside though.

If the mood weren't so somber, I might just LOL at "A ferret took up residence in my abdomen." Usually, that might be cause to giggle and perma-quote. But now is not the time. Simply not the time.

Where do we go from here? A lot of excitement, and a lot of disappointment. Both optimism and pessimism are fine. Just try to be civil to each other.

Awful. Just awful. Football seems a pretty small deal right now.

"I told coach that if he gave me an opportunity, I would get him a sack. I asked if I could play end on one play. I went straight ahead and wasn't going to be denied." -- North Texas DL Brandon McCoy

While it is appreciated, it is probably for the best that I don't have one. It'd be so negative the server would crash.

If 105.3 issues a sports opinion, but no one is listening, does it still count?

I really hate to do the thing, but I had a meeting this afternoon with a fairly highly placed person in the UNT power structure. It was this person's opinion that the sole reason for this report was to convince the board of regents to open up UNT's collective pocketbook for a certain high profile football coach. In essence, it is a kind of political token to be used as backup, justification, or due dilligence should the BOR go in that direction. Now I have no idea how accurate this is; it could all be an opinion. So just take it with a fairly generous helping of salt. Now, whether this report is intended to drum up support for a big name coach or as an "in" to CUSA, the fact remains that this report is more important for political capital than any sort of true technical evaluation. It honestly doesn't matter that we've been saying the exact same things on the board for the past five years. It is not nearly so much about the CONTENT of the letter as it is about WHO is making the observations. It isn't what we want to hear, but the truth of the matter is that Chuck Neinas' voice carries political and professional weight, and ours do not. That's just the way politics go.

Thoughts on the death robot: 1) As was mentioned before, the color is off. Last time I checked, the colors for this university were green and white. 2) Would it kill someone to put an interlocked NT or SOW on there somewhere? 3) I only count 30 missile slots and four autocannons. I understand that the model is probably "expandable" to 50 and 8, but come on, if we're going to build this, let's build it right. 4) Has anyone considered corporate naming rights? Would anyone really mind it being called the Mattress Mac Blockbuster Golden Chick Death-bot 9000? Why isn't the university at least entertaining this idea? I guess no one over there cares for extra money lol. 5) Finally, I got word the other day that UTSA and Texas State already had plans to build one, and their students voted in an extra $50 a credit hour to fund R&D. Yet another example of how we get passed by daily.

I really don't have an opinion on TodgeRodge's post. I was just suggesting a possiblity for content and presentation of the Neinas report.

???