Welcome to GoMeanGreen.com Forum
![]() |
Welcome to GoMeanGreen.com Forum, home of University of North Texas students, alumni and fans. Like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process that requires minimal information for you to signup. Be a part of the GoMeanGreen.com family by signing in or creating an account.
|
Expect swift opinions in Supreme Court health care ruling
#1
Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:14 PM
They have no clue what the court will decide. And they will have plenty to say outside the court immediately after — in high praise or denunciation.
Much like the court's three days of oral arguments on the Affordable Care Act in late March, Thursday will feature a crowded, hushed courtroom and a cacophonous series of sidewalk demonstrations.
For some lawyers and lawmakers who have fought the health care battle for years — and in some cases, decades — it's an opportunity to witness history inside the marble courthouse.
"There's an atmosphere of intense, quiet excitement," says Neal Katyal, who represented the Obama administration before the court as acting solicitor general in 2010-11. "People are sitting in that room knowing history is about to be made."
Read more: http://www.usatoday....62/1?csp=34news
"In that first game we played like we did against. A lot of huff and puff but little to show for it." jessyj
#2
Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:30 PM
WASHINGTON Tea Party and union members, liberals and conservatives, Republicans and Democrats have two things in common as the Supreme Court prepares to announce its verdict on President Obama's health care law Thursday.
They have no clue what the court will decide. And they will have plenty to say outside the court immediately after in high praise or denunciation.
Much like the court's three days of oral arguments on the Affordable Care Act in late March, Thursday will feature a crowded, hushed courtroom and a cacophonous series of sidewalk demonstrations.
For some lawyers and lawmakers who have fought the health care battle for years and in some cases, decades it's an opportunity to witness history inside the marble courthouse.
"There's an atmosphere of intense, quiet excitement," says Neal Katyal, who represented the Obama administration before the court as acting solicitor general in 2010-11. "People are sitting in that room knowing history is about to be made."
Read more: http://www.usatoday....62/1?csp=34news
Which ever way you lean on this issue, you have to admire the confidentiality of all members of the Supreme Court who have known which way the decision will go for quite some time. Not just justices, but their clerks and many of their staff.
High tension in the final hours.
#3
Posted 28 June 2012 - 07:58 AM
WHY NOT NORTH TEXAS INDEED!!!!
#4
Posted 28 June 2012 - 08:10 AM
Rick
Edited by FirefightnRick, 28 June 2012 - 08:15 AM.
#5
Posted 28 June 2012 - 08:24 AM
You may recall that O and his group said adamantly over and over and over again that the mandate was NOT A TAX! Let's see how he flip flops on that with the speed of light and claims victory and works quickly to make it a tax!!!!
Stand by..the fat lady hasn't started to sing as yet, and this really has not solved much it looks like with the early read on things....seems just as messy now as it was before the ruling.
Fun times ahead....
Edited by KRAM1, 28 June 2012 - 08:26 AM.
WHY NOT NORTH TEXAS INDEED!!!!
#6
Posted 28 June 2012 - 08:25 AM
Rick
#7
Posted 28 June 2012 - 08:34 AM
My take is more like this....
(Granted, only from having read summaries and thoughts of other people)
The justices spent most of the day trying to find a way to strike down the mandate but keep most of the rest of the law (about which the constitutionality is less in doubt), then realized how integral it was to the thing, and threw up their hands in frustration. I think it's gonna stand, 5-4, with the four liberal justices upholding it on the Commerce Clause and Kennedy coming up with some reason of their own to uphold it (possibly because he sees the tax penalty as a legitimate lack of coercion).
I only missed on Roberts instead of Roberts instead of Kennedy.
#8
Posted 28 June 2012 - 08:41 AM

Well...this should be a fun thread today...
#9
Posted 28 June 2012 - 10:25 AM
What a bunch of kill-joys.
#10
Posted 28 June 2012 - 10:28 AM
Skinny legs and jean shorts? Dude!
Well...this should be a fun thread today...
#11
Posted 28 June 2012 - 10:31 AM
.."President Obama signaled in our interview that he was prepared to address some of the concerns raised by key Senator Jay Rockefeller, who called the Baucus bill a “big middle class tax increase” this week.
That means he’ll support more subsidies for middle class families.
But in our most spirited exchange, the President refused to accept the argument that a mandate to buy health insurance is equivalent to a tax...."
http://abcnews.go.co...e-is-not-a-tax/
Rick
Edited by FirefightnRick, 28 June 2012 - 10:32 AM.
#12
Posted 28 June 2012 - 10:32 AM
#13
Posted 28 June 2012 - 10:37 AM
#14
Posted 28 June 2012 - 10:38 AM
(1) I already buy health insurance, so the tax would not apply to me anyway.
(2) I sell health insurance, so it will be good for my business.
(3) I saw the Scorpions last night at Verizon with Tesla as the opening act.
"We're losing 31-0 to a team that has completed 1 pass for 4 passing yards.”
a Texas fan during the 3rd Quarter of UT's 39-14 loss to Kansas State
11-06-2010
#15
Posted 28 June 2012 - 10:41 AM
http://www.politico....uly-127555.html
Update: vote will be July 11th.
Rick
Edited by FirefightnRick, 28 June 2012 - 10:44 AM.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users














