Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Welcome to GoMeanGreen.com Forum

Welcome to GoMeanGreen.com Forum, home of University of North Texas students, alumni and fans.  Like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process that requires minimal information for you to signup. Be a part of the GoMeanGreen.com family by signing in or creating an account.
  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get automatic updates
  • Get your own profile and make new friends
  • Get access to the chat room, member map, arcade, photo gallery and much, much more!
  • Customize your experience here
  • Access premium content and features only available to registered members
  • Registration is simple and easy as we allow use of valid Google, Facebook and Twitter accounts:  Click here to register
Thanks for visiting and as always -- GO MEAN GREEN!
Guest Message by DevFuse
 

Photo
* * * * * 1 votes

Possible Sun Belt


  • Please log in to reply
44 replies to this topic

#31 GreenN'walinsVet

GreenN'walinsVet

    Mean Green Eagle

  • Members
  • 1,299 posts

Posted 15 February 2012 - 09:37 AM

And our stadium will remain empty because no one in our fan base gives 2 craps about these schools.

You and I would go see UNt play Midwestern St. In football (hey, they are close, let's get them on the schedule!). Fans like us are not the concern


To me this is where i think you are wrong. We constantly complain that we don't play anybody our students have heard about or care about, but most of our students have friends that attend Texas State and or UTSA. They will care about those games because bragging rights will be on the line. People don't miss our games with FAU because they haven't heard of them, they stay away because their is no connection. Yes if we brought in Notre Dame kids would come out with no connection because they heard of them, but just because kids have heard of Temple or UAB (maybe) or Fresno State doesn't mean that they are just going to start filling the stadium. They will come when there is a real interest, and bragging rights with your high school friends or even family is one of those reasons.
  • 5
Posted Image
Posted Image
Posted Image
Posted Image
Posted Image
Posted Image

#32 untjim1995

untjim1995

    Green Eggs and Sedition Eagle

  • Members
  • 1,572 posts

Posted 15 February 2012 - 09:56 AM

I really don't think UNT spent all that $$ on upgrading facilities, building a new stadium and "committing" to athletics to stay in the Sunbelt much less jump on the chance to be in a conference with 1-AA teams.

If they did then......yikes

I have said this often, but building Apogee literally saved the UNT Football program from extinction, as Fouts was decrepit and literally couldn't function as a stadium anymore. Generators had to be used to prop that old dump up for a gameday. Apogee keeps us from ever worrying about losing the program, as it is beautiful and modern and cost a lot of money, so the university HAS to keep the program going.

What Apogee can't do, though, is get us to move upward to a new conference and change our university's reputation regarding athletics from the last 50+ years. Sure, Apogee will help us if we were to move up, but having games against Texas Southern, Florida International, South Alabama, Louisiana-Lafayette, and Arkansas State will never drive attendance in this market. New conferences want TV sets and media coverage, along with a winning program. Our DFW market has the TV sets, but we have very little media coverage, and obviously, the winning hasn't really been there to create a buzz around the program.

What I think about UTSA and Texas State is that they are solid fallbacks for the Sun Belt Conference. I don't think we should try to blackball them, ala SMU vs us, but I don't think we should go overboard to help them get included, either. Same goes for La Tech, and really NMSU, who abandoned our conference and forced us to take the two tranistional Florida Airport schools just to stay FBS. If the conference leadership decides for any of those schools to be admitted, it will be good for UNT, only because people here know of those schools and are somewhat easy to travel to. But, it will also be bad for us because we still have no one with any FBS skins on the wall to be conference mates with from Texas, which further perpetuates our problem that no one worth a damn to Texans will ever be associated with us in a conference. And, to me, the biggest gain from moving up into the merger is that I believe that the future first culling of FBS will be from the WAC/SBC/MAC. I realize that there could be a future culling after this that would take out the remaining Alliance teams, too, but I don't think that will happen any time soon. But I do think that non-Alliance, non-AQs, are going to get dropped back down to a FCS existence, and it will probably happen within the next decade. If we can get in with the Alliance and if we have even just a couple of Texas teams in that league, as well as Tulsa, Tulane, USM, etc. to be associated with, it would do a lot to help continue our progress as a FBS program, as it would probably cement us at the FBS level for many years to come. I don't believe that being in the SBC/WAC conglomerate will do that. I think it will just continue to make us an after-thought in DFW and eventually move us back to a non-FBS level in the future.
  • 2
It is better to be pissed off than to be pissed on...

#33 smoothfresh

smoothfresh

    Bald Eagle

  • Members
  • 98 posts

Posted 15 February 2012 - 10:02 AM

Another great post Vet.. guess what our students aren't going to give a crap about the likes of East Carolina or San Jose State coming to Apogee. The problem is not us loyal fans who are on this board talking and following UNT athletics every move. Regional teams are a good way to at least attempt to get people to come to our fantastic stadium.. guess what the likes of LSU, USC, Virginia Tech aren't venturing this way anytime soon. We had Indiana at home.. was that crowd really what we should settle for?? no way.. at least with Texas State or someone in the area we at least have the possibility of getting a few of their fans up and having some of our students invite their buddies who go to these schools up for a weekend of football and partying in our town.

Edited by smoothfresh, 15 February 2012 - 10:05 AM.

  • 1

#34 Green Mean

Green Mean

    Mean Green Eagle

  • Members
  • 4,507 posts

Posted 15 February 2012 - 10:29 AM

Add LT, NMSU, and Texas State and I'll be content should we get passed up. I'm sorry but I think UTSA has to earn their stripes and go through several struggles and lots of pain before going to the perfect situation for them so quickly.
  • 1

Time is a great teacher, but unfortunately it kills all its pupils ... - Louis Hector Berlioz

Excuse me, is your refrigerator running? Because if it is, it probably runs like you - very homosexually. - Peter Griffin

Yu-Darvish-five-pitches-once-Rangers.gif


#35 UNT90

UNT90

    GoMeanGreen.com Addict

  • Members
  • 9,220 posts

Posted 15 February 2012 - 11:36 AM

To me this is where i think you are wrong. We constantly complain that we don't play anybody our students have heard about or care about, but most of our students have friends that attend Texas State and or UTSA. They will care about those games because bragging rights will be on the line. People don't miss our games with FAU because they haven't heard of them, they stay away because their is no connection. Yes if we brought in Notre Dame kids would come out with no connection because they heard of them, but just because kids have heard of Temple or UAB (maybe) or Fresno State doesn't mean that they are just going to start filling the stadium. They will come when there is a real interest, and bragging rights with your high school friends or even family is one of those reasons.

Ya, huge bragging rights with beating UTSA or Texas St. HUGE!!

There will be no bragging rights because students at those institutions don't care about their football program. Think UNT circa 1986.

We are just starting to develop a fan base. This would be the equivelant of eating our young.
  • 0

#36 UNTLifer

UNTLifer

    Mean Green Icon

  • Members
  • 15,581 posts

Posted 15 February 2012 - 12:42 PM

Somebody call me when facts replace speculation.

Edited by UNTLifer, 15 February 2012 - 12:43 PM.

  • 2

"I would drink beer and watch 22 dogs play in a dog park if there was a football involved. I hate this time of year. " bigrobdsp 6/24/2004

 

"If we can't actually bitch about something we can always be sarcastic and/or cynical about it........ B)" SilverEagle 5/7/2013

 

 

 


#37 foutsrouts

foutsrouts

    Mean Green Eagle

  • Members
  • 2,604 posts

Posted 15 February 2012 - 12:59 PM

Why don't we just join the Southland or SWAC and be done with it. Geez..... :rolleyes:
  • 0

#38 Eagle1855

Eagle1855

    XBox Eagle

  • Members
  • 4,804 posts

Posted 15 February 2012 - 01:05 PM

Why don't we just join the Southland or SWAC and be done with it. Geez..... :rolleyes:


It would certainly cost a lot less. and hey, we could win a national championship!
  • 0
I do other things when I'm not doing this.

Posted Image

#39 Eagle1855

Eagle1855

    XBox Eagle

  • Members
  • 4,804 posts

Posted 15 February 2012 - 01:16 PM

I mean seriously, it's clear how lowly we are thought of in the world of College Football. We aren't even discussed as a possible addition to ANY conference by anyone, outside of college football forums.

There are now 7 BCS teams in Texas, and we aren't one of them. Which means we are now one of three other teams in the state currently playing FBS football that aren't in a major conference. Which means seven other teams will have first crack at every single recruit in this state, plus the hosts of schools surrounding Texas that regularly recruit the hell out of our backyard.

What can we offer a FBS student above and beyond anyone in DFW, much less the rest of Texas? We aren't the best academically. We aren't in a good conference. We don't have a rabid fan base. We don't have the finest location in the state... I mean, what is there that UNT offers that bests the rest, in the mind of a college recruit?

This last batch of realignment seems to have really screwed us. ASSUMING all things remain as they are... which we all know is subject to change... what's the bright side? What is there to be excited about? Being better than UTSA and Texas State? Who cares.

Feel free to delete this if you think it will negatively affect recruiting more than the Sun Belt/WAC talk already does.

Edited by Eagle1855, 15 February 2012 - 01:20 PM.

  • 2
I do other things when I'm not doing this.

Posted Image

#40 Eastwood Eagle

Eastwood Eagle

    Mean Green Eagle

  • Members
  • 1,217 posts

Posted 15 February 2012 - 01:43 PM

To me this is where i think you are wrong. We constantly complain that we don't play anybody our students have heard about or care about, but most of our students have friends that attend Texas State and or UTSA. They will care about those games because bragging rights will be on the line. People don't miss our games with FAU because they haven't heard of them, they stay away because their is no connection. Yes if we brought in Notre Dame kids would come out with no connection because they heard of them, but just because kids have heard of Temple or UAB (maybe) or Fresno State doesn't mean that they are just going to start filling the stadium. They will come when there is a real interest, and bragging rights with your high school friends or even family is one of those reasons.


I could not agree with you more. We need to think of a way to make sure we have some in state rivalries IF we get passed up by this new conference. Adding these two schools will benefit UNT in the LONG RUN (and short run) because over time we can build rivalries with these two schools. Stop thinking short sighted. In 20+ years when all three schools have solid football programs this can be a fun rivalry and it starts now.

This superiority stuff is getting old. I do not believe UNT is in a position to turn our nose up at two up and coming Division 1 football teams in two great Texas cities, where students and alumni have friends that graduated from these schools.

And the argument that we would lose out to recruits is a joke. Win and the recruits will come.

Edited by Eastwood Eagle, 15 February 2012 - 01:44 PM.

  • 0

#41 UNT90

UNT90

    GoMeanGreen.com Addict

  • Members
  • 9,220 posts

Posted 15 February 2012 - 01:44 PM

I mean seriously, it's clear how lowly we are thought of in the world of College Football. We aren't even discussed as a possible addition to ANY conference by anyone, outside of college football forums.

There are now 7 BCS teams in Texas, and we aren't one of them. Which means we are now one of three other teams in the state currently playing FBS football that aren't in a major conference. Which means seven other teams will have first crack at every single recruit in this state, plus the hosts of schools surrounding Texas that regularly recruit the hell out of our backyard.

What can we offer a FBS student above and beyond anyone in DFW, much less the rest of Texas? We aren't the best academically. We aren't in a good conference. We don't have a rabid fan base. We don't have the finest location in the state... I mean, what is there that UNT offers that bests the rest, in the mind of a college recruit?

This last batch of realignment seems to have really screwed us. ASSUMING all things remain as they are... which we all know is subject to change... what's the bright side? What is there to be excited about? Being better than UTSA and Texas State? Who cares.

Feel free to delete this if you think it will negatively affect recruiting more than the Sun Belt/WAC talk already does.


The main thing we offer is 3 star recruits the chance to compete immediately for playing time. Some kids value the opportunity to compete more than going to a BCS school where they will ride the bench for their entire career (but only the really smart ones get this). Our facilities are also pretty dang nice.

But I get where you are coming from. I fear that not moving up this time around may kill any chance this program has of ever moving up.
  • 2

#42 KRAM1

KRAM1

    A proud member of the Mean Green Nation

  • Members
  • 8,116 posts

Posted 15 February 2012 - 01:56 PM

Somebody call me when facts replace speculation.


AMEN and thank you. Could not agree more!
  • 0
GO MEAN GREEN!

WHY NOT NORTH TEXAS INDEED!!!!

#43 Green Mean

Green Mean

    Mean Green Eagle

  • Members
  • 4,507 posts

Posted 15 February 2012 - 02:04 PM

Somebody call me when facts replace speculation.


What's the fun in that?
  • 0

Time is a great teacher, but unfortunately it kills all its pupils ... - Louis Hector Berlioz

Excuse me, is your refrigerator running? Because if it is, it probably runs like you - very homosexually. - Peter Griffin

Yu-Darvish-five-pitches-once-Rangers.gif


#44 UNT90

UNT90

    GoMeanGreen.com Addict

  • Members
  • 9,220 posts

Posted 15 February 2012 - 02:32 PM

I could not agree with you more. We need to think of a way to make sure we have some in state rivalries IF we get passed up by this new conference. Adding these two schools will benefit UNT in the LONG RUN (and short run) because over time we can build rivalries with these two schools. Stop thinking short sighted. In 20+ years when all three schools have solid football programs this can be a fun rivalry and it starts now.

This superiority stuff is getting old. I do not believe UNT is in a position to turn our nose up at two up and coming Division 1 football teams in two great Texas cities, where students and alumni have friends that graduated from these schools.

And the argument that we would lose out to recruits is a joke. Win and the recruits will come.


The inferiority stuff has been around a LOT longer.

And like I said in another post, Midwestern St. is close, let's add them as a rival also.

Could Tarleton St. (hey, a road game close to Granbury!!) and Abilene Christian be far behind? I mean, they are in Texas, right? We shouldn't turn our nose up at them.
  • 1

#45 foutsrouts

foutsrouts

    Mean Green Eagle

  • Members
  • 2,604 posts

Posted 15 February 2012 - 02:51 PM

The inferiority stuff has been around a LOT longer.

And like I said in another post, Midwestern St. is close, let's add them as a rival also.

Could Tarleton St. (hey, a road game close to Granbury!!) and Abilene Christian be far behind? I mean, they are in Texas, right? We shouldn't turn our nose up at them.

Yes, why not encourage all of our old Southland mates to move up and join the party? That way, when the day comes for the final separation between the haves and have nots, we can all settle back down together once again into the cozy 1AA comfort of the good ole Southland Conference.
  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users