Jump to content

24 hour rule


Harry

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Harry said:

Everyone is mourning what transpired yesterday but it is time  to move on.  Some of us have been here before.  You dust yourself off and reset your expectations.  Time to move forward.

So the 19 hour rule then. Or if we're counting the conclusion of our domination, then like the 15 hour rule.

  • Lovely Take 1
  • Downvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Harry said:

Everyone is mourning what transpired yesterday but it is time  to move on.  Some of us have been here before.  You dust yourself off and reset your expectations.  Time to move forward.

Baylor is wanting to hit the reset button. Always have to remember, there is someone out there that has it a lot worse. 

  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Cr1028 said:

Expectations reset to 2015 levels until given a reason to believe otherwise. On the bright side, not going to a bowl game will save me a bit of money.

A little confused how most people predicted between five and seven wins, we take one loss and no longer are going to win a game... lol

  • Upvote 5
  • Haha 2
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Caw Caw said:

A little confused how most people predicted between five and seven wins, we take one loss and no longer are going to win a game... lol

 

1 minute ago, BTG_Fan1 said:

A game that a lot of people predicted as a loss before the season as well.. 

It's not that we lost. In the little score thread I predicted a loss. 

I don't care that we lose games. We can't win them all. No one hardly does. I care about how we lost. 

There has not been improvement across the board. One could argue that we have regressed or maintained. 

Last year, even in our losses, the 1st and sometimes 2nd offensive drive look promising. We look composed, well called, good execution. Then we sputter off into a oblivious haze. Sound familiar last night? That tells me 1 of 2 things, or both. 

1) Seth L. is scripting the first couple of series with GH during the week, then GH takes over after the scripted series happen. 

And/or

2) Better coaches are adjusting to what we're doing and we keep trying to drive square peg into circle. 

If 1 is happening, as I suspect, SL needs to take over calling plays and kindly give GH his pink slip at seasons end. If 2 is happening, we're in trouble and SL still needs to take over play calling. 

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Ben Gooding said:

 

It's not that we lost. In the little score thread I predicted a loss. 

I don't care that we lose games. We can't win them all. No one hardly does. I care about how we lost. 

There has not been improvement across the board. One could argue that we have regressed or maintained. 

Last year, even in our losses, the 1st and sometimes 2nd offensive drive look promising. We look composed, well called, good execution. Then we sputter off into a oblivious haze. Sound familiar last night? That tells me 1 of 2 things, or both. 

1) Seth L. is scripting the first couple of series with GH during the week, then GH takes over after the scripted series happen. 

And/or

2) Better coaches are adjusting to what we're doing and we keep trying to drive square peg into circle. 

If 1 is happening, as I suspect, SL needs to take over calling plays and kindly give GH his pink slip at seasons end. If 2 is happening, we're in trouble and SL still needs to take over play calling. 

I'll start with, I think you have some decent points. I'll follow that with saying, I think we had a young team play a bad game. Definitely some improvement to me at QB, WR. We've taken a step back at special teams and I think Darden needs to catch every punt from here on out. Line had a couple good series, and when Fine had time, he delivered. I don't think I've ever seen a UNT QB throw for 400+ yards win or loss in my time as a fan. Defense was really good against the run, but got tired because we aren't super deep yet. The game got out of hand, but I think SMU is a better team than we give them credit for. Their DE Lawler and Sutton will definitely play on Sundays, their center and that LSU transfer receiver might as well. This is the toughest stretch of the season, but I think the conference is wide open. No one has looked particularly good. Utep, Rice are still struggling. I'm interested to see the USM, UTSA game. Army looks beatable. I'm just not ready to fire sale the season, the staff or the team after a bad game. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ben Gooding said:

R

It's not that we lost. In the little score thread I predicted a loss. 

I don't care that we lose games. We can't win them all. No one hardly does. I care about how we lost. 

There has not been improvement across the board. One could argue that we have regressed or maintained. 

Last year, even in our losses, the 1st and sometimes 2nd offensive drive look promising. We look composed, well called, good execution. Then we sputter off into a oblivious haze. Sound familiar last night? That tells me 1 of 2 things, or both. 

1) Seth L. is scripting the first couple of series with GH during the week, then GH takes over after the scripted series happen. 

And/or

2) Better coaches are adjusting to what we're doing and we keep trying to drive square peg into circle. 

If 1 is happening, as I suspect, SL needs to take over calling plays and kindly give GH his pink slip at seasons end. If 2 is happening, we're in trouble and SL still needs to take over play calling. 

Really? 

I thought we lost because our defense gave up 54 points.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Ben Gooding said:

IGotta score points to win in 2017. This isn't your or my daddy's 1960 wishbone + good defense days. We'll be in shootouts much more than not. Wanna win games? Be efficient on O and outscore your opponent. 

We didn't give up that points in any game last year.

If we had scored 32 points in every game last year, we would have been 8-4-1.

If we had given  up 54 points in every game last year, we would have been 0-12.

 

  • Downvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, casual fan said:

We didn't give up that points in any game last year.

If we had scored 32 points in every game last year, we would have been 8-4-1.

If we had given  up 54 points in every game last year, we would have been 0-12.

 

When an opposing offense starts throwing haymakers, we throw out routes. That was a big issue. Our shots down field didn't come until we were 30 points behind. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Tell a friend

    Love GoMeanGreen.com? Tell a friend!
  • What's going on Mean Green?

    1. 4

      Ladies land Tech transfer

    2. 12

      Doesn't seem new, but unlimited transfers

    3. 11

      The Athletic on DFW Football recruiting

    4. 0

      SB at Memphis (4/19-21/24)

  • Popular Contributors

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      15,382
    • Most Online
      1,865

    Newest Member
    KeithSHU
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.