Jump to content

JUCO RB Anthony Wyche (Los Angeles Valley)


Recommended Posts

Anthony Wyche 

Los Angeles, California  (LA Valley)

Running Back 

Ht 5-9

Wt 189

We have offered. He currently has an offer from Southeastern Louisiana and a PWO to Georgia. I believe he is a qualifier and would be a 2016 recruit and would have 3 years left to play.  

http://www.hudl.com/athlete/2045583/highlights/297907517

Interview with him :http://www.recruitingnewsguru.com/video-interview-with-los-angeles-valley-college-with-freshman-rb-anthony-wyche/

Edited by TheReal_jayD
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
56 minutes ago, MEANGREENCOACH2 said:

another RB.. should we be worried about Willie Ivery's grades?

 

Welcome to North Texas!!!

No, you should be worried about the total lack of depth behind Wilson

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a little baffled about this also.  However, I thought that Willy Ivery didn't participate in spring practice but if you'll review the Graham Harrell Mic'd Up video you'll see #29 in full pads kneeling and batting tennis balls with one hand.  

My thought was that they're converting him to wide receiver where his size is less a detriment and his speed and open-field moves are a real plus.  In addition, there is a lot less blocking big defensive linemen or blitzing linebackers.  Defensive backs are much nearer his size.  

I could easily be wrong but in many ways he reminds me of a Brelan Chancellor/Carlos Harris clone.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure why he has not committed earlier from the looks of his video.  I like his speed and yards after initial contact.  He rarely goes down on first contact, has good vision and attacks the hole at the line of scrimmage.  It will be interesting to see how this translates to D1 ball.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vision>>

Very quick to hit the hole and make decisions - that may help us. Layers moves, maintains momentum. Uses blockers to his advantage, baits defenders. Not all that great in the open field, sometimes cuts/baits too early, so I'd rather keep him in between the tackles. Needs to be more consistent in keeping pads low because he's got a truck stick and fairly good balance.

The closer we can inch him toward 200, especially around his thighs, the better. Would like to see him in short yardage and red zone situations here since he's quick to the hole and has a nose for the endzone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought we were already full for the 2016 class. I wonder if this means someone isn't going to make it or if they are not going to put him on scholarship until after school starts and push him into 2017 class.

Also, based on Wyche's tweet, good to hear that God is a Mean Green fan.  I hope the negativity of the board doesn't change his mind.  Wish he would post more.  His first ten posts were pretty good, but it's been a while.

Edited by TreeFiddy
  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, TreeFiddy said:

I thought we were already full for the 2016 class. I wonder if this means someone isn't going to make it or if they are not going to put him on scholarship until after school starts and push him into 2017 class.

Also, based on Wyche's tweet, good to hear that God is a Mean Green fan.  I hope the negativity of the board doesn't change his mind.  Wish he would post more.  His first ten posts were pretty good, but it's been a while.

We had one pocketed.   This is the guy we chose to use it on.   Now, onto the 2017 class.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, MGNation92 said:

Interestingly that they also play with 3 down lineman the majority of the time. I guess Ekeler likes his experience playing a 3-tech/5-tech

This guy is a very large man. I believe 6'4" 250 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, MGNation92 said:

True. But isn't a typical 3-tech like 280? I like the speed we have on defense but I wonder if the size deficiency in the line will hurt us in the run game

Yes, but we won't have 3-Techs we will have a 0 tech and 4's so they need to be big enough 260-280 to hold their own vs Tackles and quick and fast enough to shoot gaps etc.  I am sure they'd like him to be a bit heavier, but for our scheme I wouldn't say he was severely undersized particularly being in CUSA.  

Edited by GMG24
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Tell a friend

    Love GoMeanGreen.com? Tell a friend!
  • What's going on Mean Green?

    1. 25

      A-Scott Projected to OU

    2. 34

      Spring transfer portal

    3. 1

      A few HSO's

  • Popular Contributors

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      15,380
    • Most Online
      1,865

    Newest Member
    KeithSHU
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.